For now. Judge dismisses charges against James Comey and Letitia James without predjudice.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/ju...-james-finding-prosecutor-was-rcna244775

When do we start charging the judges?

Shocked! lol

I wonder what loosegoose and BC would advise when the judicial system doesn't deliver?

(NOTE! *I* am not advocating ANYTHING!)

They can dismiss b/c they don't like the prosecutor and then they can recharge with another one. Its not double jeopardy, they didn't find them not guilty. Just cant charge them this way right now.

True, but the hurdle is raised. The activist judges are the hurdle.

“…………all the judges and half the lawyers.”

I don't care a whit about this case. Unlike allowing child rapers to walk free, it doesn't effect me at all.

who raped babies?

Charge the Judge for what? Following the law?

"“This case presents the unique, if not unprecedented, situation where an unconstitutionally appointed prosecutor, 'exercising power [she] did not lawfully possess,’… acted alone in conducting a grand jury proceeding and securing an indictment,” the ruling said."

The clowns in DC literally screw up every one of their theatrical stunts. And, you guys should read before you post.

Would you feel better if I said "child rapers" instead?

I'll go back and edit it for you.

words do have meanings.

who raped children?

Prince Andrew was accused, but not yet tried. anyone else?

Why wouldn't you?

Do you know who prosecuted Epstein and Maxwell?

Hint..........her daddy ran the FBI.

Oh good question!!!! There are several people suspected to have done so. After all, Epstein didn't traffick kids to nobody. So, while I could name several names of people that are suspected, I think it would be better if the DOJ would do it's job, and do the investigation, and prosecute as necessary.


Surely you agree, right?

Bank fraud in New York, and false statements to the FBI, have no effect on my life.


But, as a father of 3 young girls, ages 9, 10, and 12, having child rapers walk free is very concerning to me.


But maybe I'm confused. Perhaps you can explain why, as a father of 3 girls, I should be more concerned about someone committing bank fraud in New York walking free, than about child rapists walking free.

Yes, you are confused or clueless.

I have no problem with seeking justice.

but "associations" should not be enough to brand anyone as "guilty".

Surely you agree, right?

Absolutely.....which is why, for the umpteenth time, the DOJ should investigate and prosecute.

what if there's only associations?

what if they already DID investigate but didn't have enough evidence to pursue it?

how do you know what steps they've taken (or failed to take?)

Then that will come out in the investigation, and those associated won't be prosecuted. Pretty simple, right?

Maureen Comey prosecuted both Epstein and Maxwell, she's the daughter of one James Comey.

So these two should garner your attention as to why they stopped with the two prosecutions I would think.

That's possible. Perhaps you can explain why bank fraud case in New York should be more important to me than child rape.

how do you know what steps have been taken, or failed to have been taken?

Because Trump isn't guilty of child rape?

Later, I'm not a teacher.

Ah, good question, and an easy one, using simple logic.

We know that Epstein trafficked children to be raped by.......not nobody. Those kids weren't trafficked to nobody. They were trafficked to someone. And yet, nobody has been arrested for raping children. So it seems obvious, then, that a proper investigation hasn't been taken place, until we see a person/people arrested for raping children.

Unless, that is, you're telling me that the DOJ conducted a good, thorough investigation, and couldn't find probable cause to arrest a single person for raping children.

you don't know that Epstein wasn't the only one who abused those kids. you are SUPPOSING that others did, as well. but the matter WAS investigated and he and Maxwell were the only ones convicted.

if you have real evidence that others were involved, you should present it to the FBI.

spit it out here so that we can draw our own conclusions. but just saying you THINK there are others involved doesn't cut it in a court of law.

One more thing for you to research.....

The DOJ is not an investigative agency, they can and do direct other agencies like the FBI to investigate.

So now we're back to the Comey's.

Lol what? Sure, bud. Epstein was the only one to rape children. He didn't traffick kids to anyone else.

The FBI is part of the DOJ, per the DOJ's own website.
DOJ website

And you still haven't explained why James Comey giving false statements or Letita somethingorother committing bank fraud should be more important to me than child rapists.

what are you basing your thoughts on?

what EVIDENCE have you seen that would justify further indictments?

you seem to be implying that a lack of evidence is evidence of a cover-up...

I mean, if you want to go down THAT road, I haven't found evidence that YOU are guilty of anything,..

Where were the judges when they let James attempt to prosecute a person that she vowed to get and when Comey allowed Hillary to go through her evidence and destroy what she wanted at will and none of these legal beagles stepped up then. The law my rear!

Logic and common sense.

Epstein was arrested in 2019 for sex trafficking of minors, and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking of minors. Trafficking isn't the same as rape/sexual assault. If the investigation revealed that he was the only one raping children, he would have been arrested for sexual assault of a minor, not trafficking.

how about you get back to us when you have evidence...either of an actual non-prosecuted crime or the cover-up thereof.

I'm wondering why a US District judge from District of South Carolina is ruing on a case in Eastern District of Virginia?

Isn't that out of her jurisdiction and out of her lane?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cameron_McGowan_Currie

Comey and James Walk?
They'd best not walk very far. All that judge did was buy those two a little time. They'll be back in court to face the music soon enough.

I hope so. But it won't be for lack of trying by these corrupt judges.

I didn’t read the ruling but didn’t the prosecutor forget to present some information to the grand jury that could of made this the outcome?

How is making a ruling BASED ON THE LAW corrupt?

LOL!