No matter which side you're on, this might be the dumbest comment yet.

She was interfering with LE acting in a lawful manner enforcing the law. She was breaking the law. Did she need killing? I would hate to be on a jury that decides this one.

https://youtu.be/AdgEsZc27zs?si=sDgvFuAYwkapPJzi

The car was coming at the agent in front of it he shot her. Watch the whole video of the incident.

THIS!!!
Yet both “teams” think their side is pushing the truth. lol
Let’s not forget about paid influencers too.

X for example is out of control pushing division. There’s really no point in even going on out anymore unless you’re fine with never seeing content from anyone you follow because all you see are the blue check mark “people”.

The fact that on a forum such as this relative to all the other sport, hobbies and interest in this world and this is being debated at all kinda blows my mind. Actions have consequences. She made premeditated decisions over days, hours, minutes and seconds to put her in that final situation. The officer had seconds to react for his safety and those around him and he acted. Period. This lady was trained to interfere prior to, made a decision to go where they were and antagonize and then disobeyed orders.

If we can’t stand strong in a group that cherishes the outdoors, then we’ve truly lost most other groups within our society. It’s no wonder that the antis gain ground every year.

Lol that’s a question, not a comment.

And what I asked is being suggested by people who are certain that this was a justified action based on her behaviors. I’m not saying she was making good decisions, and who knows her purpose for even being there, but there’s clearly debate on whether he needed to pull the trigger.

"who knows her purpose for even being there"

Really???

You are right about the debate, Leroy Bob, and none of us are going to settle it. Bottom line is, it sucks that this whole thing happened.

She served her purpose for being there. This was going to happen eventually, if not her then someone else.
The purpose of her actions and other "protesters" actions was, and is, to push legal law inforcement until something bad happens, and it did.

The buffoons in the administration, and their spokespeople, couldn't care less about the truth. Trump, Vance, Noem, et al. are maligning the lady for purely divisive political reasons.

I have a suggestion: conduct an honest investigation and shut up until it's done.

Walleye101, I get it. But I’m not going to assume to have all the facts. I’m just going to hope Tampon Tim doesn’t send in the National Guard and put Americans in a situation where they start killing each other so we turn a blind eye to some unprecedented levels of corruption.

You sir are qualified to work at ICE.

Do you own your own mask?

Blaine Blaine Blaine..

Dont give Warrior the opportunity to call you a liberal piece of crap.
Im proud to hold that title as mine for the time being.
Thank you for attention to this subject.

Mac

Proud liberal piece of crap?
Enough said.

Wow, you 2 guys that have no problem letting a car run you over are quite passive. After repeated orders to get out of the car by a law enforcement officer she chose to disobey them and got an alternative result. I haven't seen anyone comment they're happy with the result but it could've been avoided if she would've listened.

If the reports are true that she was trained to disrupt ICE and interfere with law enforcement do you 2 agree with what she was doing? It's a simple question that will be telling on what you think of American citizens or illegal aliens.

If he had said nothing and just shot her, like in the Ashley B. case, I can see it being a problem. It is a tragedy that she wasn’t strong minded enough to not be manipulated. There are many out there and this will not be the last incident.

All this is after that fact, you weren't there at the time in front of the car. both people involved were trained in one way or another before the incident and reacted to their training.......jk

So let's add other obvious context that you left out.

She was ordered to get out of the car. She chose to proceed forward moving in a vehicle that can kill anyone. The ICE agent standing in front of the vehicle was 8-10 ft away at most. It appeared to me the road was slick or had some cold weather precipitation on it. She first moved in a forward motion, THEN turned the wheel. That was a split second decision. She could have very easily turned the wheel back and accelerated and killed the officer. SHE DID NOT STOP WHEN TOLD AND MOVED FORWARD WITH ICE STANDING DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF HER.

I can tell you, and you can also, a persons reaction time to be able to get out of the way of a vehicle accelerating toward you on a slick surface IS A LIFE THREATENING SITUATION. I sincerely hate this happened and it is tragic for anyone to lose their life in this fashion but when three LE are around my vehicle, that means there are three firearms that can be drawn on me at any time. I will be outmanned and outgunned. I would have made the correct decision. She chose to fight THE MAN in favor of illegal immigration and law breaking. It was HER CHOICE. She chose poorly.

Now all you TDS loons that want to argue this, I ask you to go back and review the video with this in mind and tell me I am wrong. The ICE agent can't read minds and does not know the intentions. He made a wise but unfortunate decision. He will have to live with this the rest of his life. The shot was righteous.

Don't turn this into another George Floyd.

How does the "don't listen to cops get shot"
thing work for def people?

If they choose to drive their vehicle in a fashion that is threatening to any LE, it will most likely work out the same. If I see a gun pointed at me, I am not moving my vehicle in any way in a forward motion at the LE pointing the gun. That would be INCREDIBLY STUPID of me and anyone else. Deaf or not.