People pay $300 a month for ACA coverage, I pay $350 a month just for my supplement coverage alone now and it goes up every year I wonder is the plan to make it unaffordable in the future to save the company money or do they just hope I die. LOL
Law Dog, I think the "Not for Profit" health care systems will get a reality check from the federal government in how they spend their money so premiums won't rise as fast, if for nothing else because they aren't corporations and aren't traded on Wall Street so investors can make money off of them.
Just take a look at one of our South Dakota health care "royalty" and what they have gotten away with so far over the past 40 years. I'm pretty sure "S" still operates under a charter, or at least started that way, from the City of Sioux Falls so its run by a non-public, no share holder board of directors. They already had started expanding when I started working there in 1989 (my wife in 1986) but that greatly accelerated when carpetbagger Kelby showed up from further south and then got tied into old Uncle D. They "bought" up the largest North Dakota system but got whacked by Minnesota state government when they wanted to buy one of the Twin Cities hospitals.
Kelby burned through hundreds of millions of old (now decrepit) D's money expanding and building but then "retired" from the system with something of a 8 figure amount. The old S system lay rather quiet for a while but then last year acquired a couple dozen store for profit drug store chain when the G family (the 3rd or 4th generation) no longer wanted to do that work. There's no law that says that a "not for profit" health care system can't have any "for profit" divisions but at some point the facade of it not being a corporation or a truly privately owned company that supposely pays corporate taxes will wear thin with the federal government. Or so I hope.
P.S. I left Kelby land for good in 2002 but had only been working there non-scheduled part time after I got another full time job in 2000.