Depending how its worded. Purposely doing things against the law. The constitution is supreme law of the land should have consequences. Removal from office at a minimum. When found to do so. Its no different the subversion or treason. In my opinion.



I found asking her / pointing out how those laws actually make women old and weak victims.

Few can argue a weak man can easily over power most women. But having a gun levels the playing field in the weaker persons favor.

Here is an example of what I pointed out with a guy that was in favor of waiting periods. His reasoning was it gives a guy time to cool off if going through a divorce or something.

So I asked him who was more likely to need a gun man or woman.

Who was already likely to allready own a gun or have access to them men or women.

Then I flipped it. A woman would also have those waiting periods, is less likely to own or be able to come up with a gun when she is in danger from a man stalking her or domestic dispute wife beater type. So while she is fearfully waiting for her waiting period she is in more danger. That man won't need a gun to kick in her door and beat her to death and there is nothing she could do to stop him in time. But he is also likely to all ready have a gun or know where to get one if he wanted one to use. The funeral can be planed before the waiting period is over..

These laws cut both way.

Flip the script to a position where they can see and feel like they are in the place of helpless victim. Women are generally running on an emotional bases cpu. Feelings rule not reasion and logic. Got the get their feelings involved.

It still won't work on those of the left even when they agree with you point by point when you circle back to the full picture they reboot and go back tontheire original stance even if you broke it down point by point and theyn100% already with each one. In the case above it was a guy going through divorce not a woman.

He was acting in the same manner on emotion.

I thought the SCOTUS already said that we could own them. There are millions of these firearms out there. Let's see who gonna turn them in!

LOL

Following this thread is like catching barn swallows with chopsticks.

Ya can't.

Easy. VA passed an unconstitutional gun law. I haven't read it. Appears to be really bad based on what I read here.

Then bowhunter got all hysterical about women and how they shouldn't be in charge of anything. He derailed the thread and has some serious issues with females. He also claims to have a wife. Need to see some proof before I believe it.

Y'all should be more worried about the dems that passed this bill instead of going off target.

If we took a poll by PMs I could probably get up to 5. Maybe 6.

Are we counting deceased voters?

And illegal immigrants.

Counting dead voters and illegals may make the numbers climb to "several".

LOL

Or seven

Now that is just a blatant exaggeration Sir!

All of those Democrat Legislators, Delegates and Senators, will be up for re-election next year. Many of them will be voted out of office over this.
it is clearly a bridge too far for voters in many districts who will vote accordingly and run them out of office. Hopefully a Republican majority will result and the madness of this Governor will be stymied.

52 caril I hope your right. But considering they got in office in the first place shows how dumb or much the voters in the state care. Could be they know the win is in and voting day is just a show for the masses to give them the illusion thay have a say in the system and stay compliant.

Im sad to see anything like this get out of committee.

Why did it pass in the first place?
Because 99% of the people today don't pay attention to what's going on, outside of their little care free world!

Not only out of Committee, all it needs is the head squirrel to sign it if she hasn't already.

Protest Against gun ban that they exempted themselves (the general assembly) from, outside capital building...handing out free mags,

https://www.rawstory.com/guns-va-ban-protest-free/