From what I heard, it's on private land, near the park....so unless someone wants to buy it and restrict any other activities..they're welcome to do so.

Yes it's a terrible idea. And it's not even an American company.

Well said

16% of Canada's gdp comes from developing their natural resources yet boco gets on here and acts like its a bad thing. I dont understand it..

Maybe both of us dont get it

From what I heard, it's on private land, near the park....so unless someone wants to buy it and restrict any other activities..they're welcome to do so.

Probably generally yes, but it depends for me and many others. And there’s a difference in renewable resources like beavers versus non-renewables like oil and copper. Happy trapping! ScottW

Exactly. You nailed it, Scott. I'd be a hypocrite to be against the taking of our resources. But renewable and sustainable is much different than nonrenewable and permanent environmental damages. As trappers, hunters, fisherman, isn't it also part of our duty to protect and advocate for the resources that provide us with our bounty? Is it alright to pillage and devastate our resources and walk away? It would be a hypocrite that would say they love the hunting, trapping, the outdoors but think it's alright to destroy a resource and then shrug and walk away for future generations to rectify.

I wonder which destroys more habitat a year, mining or or folks building homes out in the country just because they want to be in the country.

I’d bet almost for sure residential development, especially on the outskirts of cities. Nary an original wetland to be found in a city or suburb nowadays. Residential and other development in areas of migratory game can and do have massive impacts on long and short term. Happy trapping! ScottW