|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: wytex]
#8611762
05/13/26 02:21 PM
05/13/26 02:21 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Nebraska
Trapset
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2009
Nebraska
|
The 3 valve 5.4 is a POS, go with the 4.6. Had an engine replacement at about 60,000 miles on my 5.4. Got rid of it shortly after and bought a 5.0 coyote truck. Love it. This ^^ You have the better of the two (4.6)
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8611782
05/13/26 03:37 PM
05/13/26 03:37 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
|
the 4.6 is what they put in all the cop cars all those years.
the problem 5.4 were 2004 to 2010 the 3 valve 5.4 Tritons
I had a pair of 5.4 2 valve tritons go a lot of miles 2000 and 2001 , the 2000 is still going to this day and gets a ton of miles. , sadly I let the 2001 go in 2019 when the brake lines rusted out , the ac wasn't working and we had no idea the poop show cars were going to be the next year. had I know that would have fixed that old rust van for sure.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8611796
05/13/26 03:57 PM
05/13/26 03:57 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Central MN, sort of old
MnMan
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2007
Central MN, sort of old
|
I had a '98 F150 for 24 years with the 4.6 and had no issues whatsoever.. You have the most reliable engine of the two you mentioned.
I'm just happy to be here! Today I'm as young as I'll ever be and and older than I've ever been before!
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8611889
05/13/26 07:27 PM
05/13/26 07:27 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2011
central mn
rats4me
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2011
central mn
|
I'm currently driving a 2009 4.6 two valve been a good engine so far, think I'm at around 212k on it doesn't use any oil in between changes. Had a 2004 f150 before that with the 5.4 had 270k on the engine when the transmission went out decided to junk it ,engine still ran good but was starting to get the typical exhaust manifold leak. Had two 4.6 trucks before that.
The main thing with these triton engines is to stay up on your oil changes to avoid the cam phaser issues Granted some guys had troubles with that at low mileage but it wasn't the norm among all the guys I know driving them
Even a blind chicken gets some corn
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8611911
05/13/26 08:33 PM
05/13/26 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
Boco
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2011
james bay frontierOnt.
|
Best old forf engine was the 300 inline 6,bulletproof engine. Owned a couple of them,last one was a 93 f 150 I sold it to a logging contractor with 300,000 km and it ran a good while after that. First one was a 78 f-100 short box.rolled it on the highway one night and the insurance co wrote it off.I sold the drivetrain for a good buck after the ins payout. We had the same engine in the large RR man haulers on the steel and tie gangs,man would those big manhaulers ever fly down the track,lol.
Forget that fear of gravity-get a little savagery in your life.
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: Boco]
#8611915
05/13/26 08:41 PM
05/13/26 08:41 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Nebraska
Trapset
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2009
Nebraska
|
Best old forf engine was the 300 inline 6,bulletproof engine. Owned a couple of them,last one was a 93 f 150 I sold it to a logging contractor with 300,000 km and it ran a good while after that. First one was a 78 f-100 short box.rolled it on the highway one night and the insurance co wrote it off.I sold the drivetrain for a good buck after the ins payout. We had the same engine in the large RR man haulers on the steel and tie gangs,man would those big manhaulers ever fly down the track,lol. Those ford in line 6’s had some crazy torque!
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8611971
05/13/26 10:22 PM
05/13/26 10:22 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane
"HOSS"
|
"HOSS"
Joined: Dec 2009
The Hill Country of Texas
|
I ran a pair of 4.6Ls into the ground back when they had steel spark plugs in Aluminum heads. Up until 160 or 180K they were great and then it was a fight to keep plugs and packs in em. These were 01 and 02 models- they may have corrected that issue
What"s good for me may not be good for the weak minded. Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8612003
05/13/26 11:59 PM
05/13/26 11:59 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
barton county kansas
Sasquatch91
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2007
barton county kansas
|
Have owned a pile of the 2 valves one 5.4, several 4.6, you did good on avoiding the 3 valve 5.4. all mine have been 300k mile trucks and running when i sold them. Have a 95 with the 302 now. Little gutless but i should beable to get another 140k outa her.
"You skin that one pilgrim."
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8612016
05/14/26 01:48 AM
05/14/26 01:48 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Scott__aR
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
|
I've owned several Fords with the 300 L6, both 3spped manual and automatics used around the farm, never felt the need for the larger V8.
I had a 4.6 Interceptor engine in a Lincoln ... torque was never a problem, although the torque came on at higher rpm than the 300 L6.
Megapredator ... top of the food chain! Member of WTA Member of U.P. Trappers Member of NTA Member of FTA
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8612055
05/14/26 07:27 AM
05/14/26 07:27 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
Them cam phasers were a problem for a looong time as Ford tried a few different things to fix the problem. I believe 1/2 way through 2020 production it was “corrected”. Can’t go wrong with a Coyote.
Only reason I’m getting a 20 Lariat with the little turbo motor is because super low miles and a good price off a buddy. Another thing I’m curious about is the little 2.8 turbo, that’s a lot of power out of a little package. I’d much rather have the Coyote, but I’m not really doing any pulling.
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: Shakeyjake]
#8612062
05/14/26 07:43 AM
05/14/26 07:43 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Nebraska
Trapset
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2009
Nebraska
|
I think it’s a 2.7 in the ford. From what I’ve heard it gets about 3mpg better mileage than the 3.5 turbo. Supposedly the 3.5 is a better all around motor than the 2.7. The 3.5 has more torque than the other choices. I’ve done a bit of pulling with the 3.5 (6 speed trans) to Canada with building material and was surprised how well it pulled. The 10 speed transmissions don’t have a great reputation. If you haven’t done the deal I’d recommend holding out for one just a ticky older so you can get the 6 speed with a 3.5 or 5.0. JMO Them cam phasers were a problem for a looong time as Ford tried a few different things to fix the problem. I believe 1/2 way through 2020 production it was “corrected”. Can’t go wrong with a Coyote.
Only reason I’m getting a 20 Lariat with the little turbo motor is because super low miles and a good price off a buddy. Another thing I’m curious about is the little 2.8 turbo, that’s a lot of power out of a little package. I’d much rather have the Coyote, but I’m not really doing any pulling.
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8612069
05/14/26 07:57 AM
05/14/26 07:57 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
Wright Brothers
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
|
I've heard of this coyote 302. Pretty good for a dink?  I'm also a 300 fan. Carried a 1/2" wrench in the ash tray. Tighten the vibes once a week. Couldn't kill that engine.
|
|
|
Re: 4.6L ford engine
[Re: AKAjust]
#8612074
05/14/26 08:17 AM
05/14/26 08:17 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
Not sure what tranny this one comes with, but it's about $20000 under market value, so I'm rolling the dice. At work we got the new fords (2025 & newer) with the 10 speeds and so far they're holding up, they do funny things sometimes though.....lol. F150-350s.
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
|
|