No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Stirling engines #8613470
05/17/26 07:26 PM
05/17/26 07:26 PM
Joined: Jan 2019
North central Iowa
B
Bob_Iowa Offline OP
trapper
Bob_Iowa  Offline OP
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2019
North central Iowa
I’ve been reading up on these and I wondered if anyone here has had experience with ones big enough to power a generator, or are they just not powerful enough.

Re: Stirling engines [Re: Bob_Iowa] #8613547
05/17/26 11:45 PM
05/17/26 11:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Scott__aR Offline
trapper
Scott__aR  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
When you say generator, how large are you referring to?

The Stirling engine is large and heavy for its equivalent output compared to an IC engine. And while about 8 percent more efficient than the IC engine, it's power is only developed at HIGH speed. In generator applications (low speed applications), it would require a speed reducer between the power plant and the generator.

Being an external combustion engine, cooling needs to be many times larger than a comparable IC engine. In stationary application, such as large generators; the size of the cooling system, needed speed reducer, and the extra size and weight of the engine may not be direct disadvantages. However, the increase in costs to build bigger must be weighed against the savings in operating costs. In portable or mobile applications, the disadvantages out weigh any increase in efficiency the engine may provide.

In a side note, the Swiss have experimented and developed a Stirling/air-independent propulsion powerplant for use in submarines. But for direct propulsion the Stirling is only capable of moving the vessel at a quarter the speed developed when using battery power. The Stirling AIP powerplant advantage (using liquid O2) is its ability for the sub to remain submerged for weeks rather than days before having to resurface to recharge batteries.


Megapredator ... top of the food chain!
Member of WTA
Member of U.P. Trappers
Member of NTA
Member of FTA
Re: Stirling engines [Re: Bob_Iowa] #8613807
Yesterday at 07:17 PM
Yesterday at 07:17 PM
Joined: Jan 2019
North central Iowa
B
Bob_Iowa Offline OP
trapper
Bob_Iowa  Offline OP
trapper
B

Joined: Jan 2019
North central Iowa
I’m thinking around 2000 to 3000 watt generator I figured a person would need some speed reduction, it would be in a stationary situation, I was looking at using just general atmospheric air and not the gases, like helium, that some use, the ones I’ve seen in those situations seem slow and don’t seem to have a lot of power. One issue I haven’t seen much of a solution to is piston lubrication, with steam engines there’s a pump that puts oil to the piston and I haven’t seen anything like that on these engines.

Re: Stirling engines [Re: Bob_Iowa] #8613888
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Scott__aR Offline
trapper
Scott__aR  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
This company may have what you are looking for,

Qnergy

manufacturing a complete Stirling engine 2 - 5 kw genset. But not inexpensive!


Megapredator ... top of the food chain!
Member of WTA
Member of U.P. Trappers
Member of NTA
Member of FTA
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread