affirmed birthright citizenship, could a business recruit pregnant foreign workers for employment with the bonus being their offspring will be citizens and receive the benefits that come with it?

Something needs to be done about pregnant women coming here for the soul purpose of birthright citizenship.Thats not what the 14th amendment was meant for.

Not very difficult to outsmart the Fed or state Goverment. Somolians took them for billions

Terminally pregnant women shouldn’t be allowed in…and perhaps it should just be criminal to come here to give birth.

Look at the money to be made. Birth tourism could be a thing. Anyone with connections down south, could make a killing. When they go into labor just send them to the emergency room where they will be treated regardless of insurance. John Q Taxpayer can pay for the labor and delivery too. Could be another revenue stream for farmers who use migrant workers.

Already is a thing.Chinese been doing it here for years.

True but SCOTUS is encouraging/promoting lawlessness now. The IRGC boys could impregnate their many wives and send them to the U.S. to give birth. Add in the ISIS and Taliban hands and in 18 or so years Sharia Law could be the law of the land. Gotta dream big! lol

Only about 250,000 births from illegals a year, what's the problem.

That's over 7% of all US births.

Keith

Should have added lol.

At least they got the biological men banned from women's sports right.

Men's sports are more interesting. I say let men play in all women's leauges. We should ban women from sports. Heck a man won woman of the year a few years ago, so I guess men are better than women at being women.

Not necessarily, they just kicked the can down to the individual states as I understand it.

Nice to see the 10th trump the 14th. The 14th was not a good amendment for State's rights.

"Whatever the merits of this argument in general, it faces particular
hurdles when applied to the Fourteenth Amendment. The Fourteenth
Amendment was a purely partisan measure, drafted and enacted entirely by
Republicans in a rump Reconstruction Congress in which the Southern
states were denied representation; it would never have made it through
Congress had all of the elected Senators and Representatives been
permitted to vote. And it was ratified not by the collective assent of the
American people, but rather at gunpoint. The Southern states had been
placed under military rule, and were forced to ratify the Amendment—
which they despised with an (un)holy hatred—as a condition of ending
military occupation and rejoining the Union.3
The Amendment may have
enjoyed military legitimacy—might makes right, and the victor on the
battlefield can dictate the terms of the peace.4
And it surely enjoyed moral
legitimacy—right is right, and the evil of racism flies in the face of
freedom and justice.5
But it can claim no warrant to democratic legitimacy
through original popular sovereignty. It was added to the Constitution
despite its open failure to obtain the support of the necessary supermajority
of the American people. "