No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Interesting Second Amendment Article #8634659
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
Three Lakes,WI 74
C
corky Online content OP
trapper
corky  Online Content OP
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
Three Lakes,WI 74


http://www.usdebtclock.org/
This place is getting more like Facebook every day.

Re: Interesting Second Amendment Article [Re: corky] #8634671
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
L
Lugnut Offline
trapper
Lugnut  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
Inside Trump's unprecedented battle plan to expand Second Amendment rights through Justice Department

Last week, the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division took the unusual step of suing California and Virginia over their gun laws, marking what officials say is an unprecedented effort to enforce Second Amendment rights.

The Justice Department is pursuing a coordinated legal strategy to expand Second Amendment protections, with Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division Harmeet Dhillon telling Fox News Digital the department has launched more than a dozen challenges to firearm restrictions across the country as it seeks to establish broader constitutional precedent.

"Since we started the second amendment section last year and even before that we filed over a dozen lawsuits challenging different restrictions in different jurisdictions," Dhillon said, pointing to challenges involving Denver's AR-15 ban, Colorado's large-capacity magazine restrictions, concealed carry permit delays in Los Angeles County, firearm regulations in the U.S. Virgin Islands and gun restrictions in the District of Columbia.

"This is a really historic amount of activity from the Department of Justice to protect the Second Amendment," Dhillon told Fox News Digital. "It's never been done before."

Previous administrations, including the Bush administration, defended individual gun rights through Supreme Court filings such as District of Columbia v. Heller, but did not use the Civil Rights Division to file affirmative lawsuits challenging state or local gun laws on Second Amendment grounds. The department's current litigation strategy marks a departure from that approach.

Dhillon said the litigation is designed to produce lasting legal precedent rather than simply challenge every firearm restriction enacted by states.

"There are a lot of people out there in the Second Amendment community who would like us to challenge every restriction on guns," she said. "That's really not our approach. We have an approach that tries to make law for the land and that's got some appellate strategy in it."

The latest phase of that effort came last week, when the Justice Department filed lawsuits against California and Virginia challenging newly enacted gun restrictions. The filings followed the Supreme Court's recent decision in Wolford v. Lopez, which reaffirmed that the Second Amendment should not be treated as a "second-class right."

The Virginia lawsuit challenges Senate Bill 749, which prohibits the manufacture, sale, transfer and purchase of certain semiautomatic firearms classified under state law as assault weapons. The California lawsuit targets two separate firearm regulations: a new restriction affecting the sale of Glock-style semiautomatic pistols and the state's longstanding handgun roster system.

She said the Virginia lawsuit targets the state's assault weapons ban because differing rulings among federal appeals courts make the issue likely to receive Supreme Court review.

In California, Dhillon said the Justice Department is focusing on two provisions it believes conflict with Supreme Court precedent: the state's restrictions affecting Glock pistols and its handgun roster requirements, which she argued have prevented Californians from purchasing firearms that are otherwise widely available across the country.

The California lawsuit was filed after Attorney General Rob Bonta declined to negotiate with the Justice Department over the state's firearm regulations. Bonta defended the challenged laws as "commonsense handgun design safety laws" intended to reduce accidental shootings and prevent illegal firearm modifications.

Gov. Gavin Newsom's office also defended the regulations, arguing California's firearm safety measures have contributed to one of the nation's lowest gun death rates while respecting the rights of lawful gun owners.

Virginia officials similarly defended their law, with Gov. Abigail Spanberger's office saying firearms designed to inflict mass casualties "do not belong in our communities" and that the legislation was intended to protect families, children and law enforcement from gun violence.

Dhillon said the Justice Department's actions reflect a broader commitment within the administration to treat the Second Amendment as a core civil right.

"This is a pioneering effort by this Department of Justice," she said. "We view the Second Amendment as a very important, indeed fundamental civil right."


Eh...wot?

Re: Interesting Second Amendment Article [Re: corky] #8634673
4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
L
Lugnut Offline
trapper
Lugnut  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
It is good to have a President willing to direct his Justice Department to defend Second Amendment rights and to do it in an intelligent and lasting way.

It is also good to have many federal courts, including the SCOTUS, willing to uphold and even expand 2A rights due to the work of that same President.


Eh...wot?

Re: Interesting Second Amendment Article [Re: corky] #8634686
4 hours ago
4 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
Northern Illinois
M
MChewk Offline
trapper
MChewk  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Dec 2006
Northern Illinois
I hope they have a chance to look at Illinois'...F.O.I.D. card

Re: Interesting Second Amendment Article [Re: corky] #8634702
3 hours ago
3 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
Three Lakes,WI 74
C
corky Online content OP
trapper
corky  Online Content OP
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
Three Lakes,WI 74
Thanks for printing it out Lugnut.


http://www.usdebtclock.org/
This place is getting more like Facebook every day.

Re: Interesting Second Amendment Article [Re: corky] #8634719
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
L
Lugnut Offline
trapper
Lugnut  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
Originally Posted by corky
Thanks for printing it out Lugnut.


Fox News won’t let me read anything on their site because I use an ad blocker. They want me to disable it before I can read the story. I refuse, there’s plenty of other sites that will allow me to read the same story.

I got this one on MSN, it’s an exact reprint of the Fox News article.

I figured it was an important enough article that anybody else with an ad blocker unable to view it should be able to see it.


Eh...wot?

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread