She's quite the standup philospher, isn't she?

She, "coalesces the vapors of human experience into a viable and meaningful comprehension."

4

My takeaway, convinced no one and he wasted 300k.

And who says crime doesn't pay.

What ARE you guy's going on about?

Candace Owens/Andrew Wilson debate on the Patrick Bet David podcast. Debating Candace's insane theories on the Charlie Kirk murder.

She got paid 300k to debate.

BTW the stand up philospher reference is a Mel Brooks History of the World Part 1 reference.

The Bea Arthur response, "Oh, a B S artist"!

And my vagueness is both an attempt to avoid political discussion of the involved individuals and to query just who is aware or just online podcast nerds like myself.

I now understand more that the normies aren't plugged in.

I didn't like Andrew Wilson last year, but I am starting to think better of him. I like his wife Rachel. Until recently, I only new him from his appearances on @Whatever, where he basically "debates" and verbally abuses, low intellect, Only Fans models. It's like shooting fish in a barrel for a debater. I saw his new Joe Rogan interview and he came across much better.

Candace Owens is clearly insane now. I wonder if someone damaged her brain chemically. Tucker, who I've never liked, comes off like she does.

Keith

Never heard of this Wilson guy until this so have no opinion of him other than he handled this debate well just speaking the known facts as presented in court without resorting to any sort of vitriol or theatrics. Nor did he take the bait on any of her histronics "don't tell me what to think" feminist drama.

Owens has a sub Saharan IQ