Re: Broadhead Talk
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8213405
09/11/24 12:15 AM
09/11/24 12:15 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 870 St. Croix County, Wisconsin
ToTheWoods
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 870
St. Croix County, Wisconsin
|
Tracking dog guy certainly has some experience tracking dogs, but probably not real scientific. Here is a study that is likely more scientific and more believable for me. I will state for the record, everone should shoot whatever they're comfortable with, but dont try to poopoo others....especially when the facts appear to conclude just the opposite....
https://deerassociation.com/high-deer-recovery-rates-fixed-blade-mechanical-broadheads/#:~:text=Mechanical%20vs.,209%20out%20of%20230%20hit).
I know more people that switched back to fixed heads. Another forum I go on that's 99% hunting kinda shows the trend. Many of these guys are hard core. They only bow hunt. They scout year round. It's all they do. They dont fish or golf. They just hunt. I'll take their word and results over a weekend warrior's word any day. Mechanicals do work of course, but they can fail too. The fixed head that's super sharp is better. It just is. I do all the things you mentioned and would definitely not call myself a "weekend warrior". Back in 82 my first broadhead was the Thunderheads in 125. Switched to the jakhammers in the mid 90's and never looked back unless shooting pass throughs. Dabbled a bit over the years but settled in on the RAGE hypodermics for both my vertical bow and wifes crossbow. Son, daughter, son in law, daughter in law all shoot the same thing. NEVER had one issue with a mechanical head. They leave bigger holes and more blood on the ground and most drop within easy eye sight in the thick north woods of Wisconsin. With a couple hundred animals shot with these I'd say they are pretty reliable. The argument either way is a nonsense one. Both styles are reliable and efficient and if it gives a person confidence in their equipment then whichever someone decides to go with is the right one to use. If you asked a hundred "die hards" which they prefer I guarantee the numbers will be very similar. Ask me how I know.
|
|
|
Re: Broadhead Talk
[Re: Providence Farm]
#8213533
09/11/24 07:43 AM
09/11/24 07:43 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 2,336 WI
WI Outdoors
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 2,336
WI
|
wi outdoors what's not speculation is the fact I have never lost a deer with the two expanding heads I listed above out of dozens. but I have lost them with fixed blades. it's not tow hard to understand an extra 3/4" cut ya almost double the size hole would have increased the chance of cutting up the lungs and important thing more than the smaller hole it got.. like I clearly stated I can't prove it but think it is likely they would have been recovered. Even in what I wrote I clearly say I can't prove it but believe. so it's my opinion based on years of experience. Yet you feel the need to post talking about speculation.
your right it can't be proven. had a friend hit a nice buck high in the back with an expanding head. He was on the ground so flat shot angle actually angering slightly up becus the deer was on a small hill. He didn't find it . 2 weeks later it was back on Camara with big hole in his back that was healing nicely. it was the same shot location of every deer I have lost so yes its possible it may not have made a difference on a few of them mainly the ones that were longer shots with little to no downward angle. But I believe the Close shots with steep angles it would have made all the difference. But like I said It can't be proven. yet I have never lost a single deer shooting an expanding head personally but I can't say the same for fixed blades. there are some real junk expanding heads with week bladed that break off. I will never shoot a rage at a deer again once was enough Gave the rest of them away..
fixed blades are better on heavy bone mechanicals are less likely to have a blade hit a twig and deflect and leave a bigger blood trail. shot a squirrel once I would not have killed had I been shooting an expanding head at the time. a single blade cut its throat would have missed with an expanding head most likely.
there are pros and cons to everything. I have killed a lot of deer with a bow . Killed my first several deer with a bow at about 13. Several years I bow hunted all gun season never taking a gun hunting. any head will work some better than others. some guys say they like here I wouldn't hunt with becuse the tend to wind plane and loose blades easily. But it's what they like and works for them and I don't say a thing about it to them..
But lots of experts sure chime in their opinion and the best part is they state they got their opinions about them based on what they see on tv NOT personal experience. let that sink in. No expert. Just sharing what I've seen over the years. We're all having a conversation here. Not a pissing match. We're all on the same team. I personally don't care what others shoot.
FREE MARTY!
|
|
|
Re: Broadhead Talk
[Re: 330-Trapper]
#8213614
09/11/24 10:03 AM
09/11/24 10:03 AM
|
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 2,336 WI
WI Outdoors
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2023
Posts: 2,336
WI
|
I like those. Along with Magnus Buzzcuts. They're very similar.
FREE MARTY!
|
|
|
Re: Broadhead Talk
[Re: SGT. C]
#8213924
09/11/24 09:04 PM
09/11/24 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,306 Midlands South Carolina
SGT. C
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 3,306
Midlands South Carolina
|
I will give the swacks a try. Plenty of does still around from last year. Whack a couple. Then settle in for.the big boy. Sarge
Getting old is a fatal mistake
Always looking for reloading componets
I know a beaver or two, because I've seen a beaver or two
|
|
|
Re: Broadhead Talk
[Re: SGT. C]
#8213955
09/11/24 09:22 PM
09/11/24 09:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,260 western mn
bucksnbears
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 8,260
western mn
|
Imma gonna shoot my bear this year with a V_Max bullet. If I punch him right..., it " might" work.
swampgas chili and schmidt beer makes for a deadly combo
You have to remember that 1 out of 3 Democratic Voters is just as dumb as the other two.
|
|
|
|
|