|
Re: Nutria trapping question
[Re: otterman53]
#6716840
01/04/20 09:39 PM
01/04/20 09:39 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,766 Oregon
beaverpeeler
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,766
Oregon
|
At least with nutria the carpal bones are stronger than rats and beaver so you don't get ring off.
My fear of moving stairs is escalating!
|
|
|
Re: Nutria trapping question
[Re: otterman53]
#6716843
01/04/20 09:42 PM
01/04/20 09:42 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 206 Ridgefield, WA
Bearguy
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 206
Ridgefield, WA
|
I've caught thousands of 'em, at least a #2 coil, or #3 long spring. They have tough feet, front and back, so drowning them isn't necessary. They have a much larger hind foot, so trap spread will cut down on misses. Last tip, you can direct them to step right on the pan by not covering the trap, just bed in trail.
All you "Woke" people need to go back to sleep!
|
|
|
Re: Nutria trapping question
[Re: H2ORat]
#6717803
01/05/20 08:08 PM
01/05/20 08:08 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,313 Virginia
52Carl
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 8,313
Virginia
|
If i was going for nutria in a big way ( I'd be broke), but i would and do use way more 220's than footholds. I wouldn't choose the 1 1/2 ls because of fact that nutria are very clumsy and do stumble all over your sets and i feel that the cs is easier to push into the mud and make more stable. I have far fewer misses with the bodygrips and the areas i trap have lots of obvious trails-- nutria aren't very smart so no need to worry about disguising or hiding the trap. Apple slices seem to work best for me as bait. I'm with you on the 220s, but the original topic was footholds. Now that we are off topic, I would stock up on snares too. Easier to carry a ton of them through God forsaken nutria habitat. I found out the hard way that you need the same snares that you would use for beaver. Nutria have a set of cable cutters in their mouth. A 20 pound nutria has bigger teeth than a 40 pound beaver.
|
|
|
|
|
|