No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
WATCH: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards While Pushing Gun Control
An attendee at the March 2, 2020, Fox News town hall asked Mike Bloomberg why he pushes gun control for the common man but surrounds himself with armed security. The attendee said, “You have an armed security detail that is likely equipped with the same firearms and magazines you seek to ban the common citizen from owning. Does your life matter more than mine or my family’s?” Bloomberg responded by admitting to having an armed detail, and suggesting he needs armed protection because he gets more threats than the common man. On February 3, 2020, Breitbart News reported that Bloomberg enjoyed armed security even as he campaigned on a platform of gun control for the common man. The New York Post reported on Bloomberg referring to the NYPD as his “own army,” while Mayor of New York City. And on January 25, 2019, NRA-ILA reported that after his tenure as mayor ended, “Bloomberg hired some of the same [NYPD] officers from his security detail to work for him privately.” Yet he continued to push gun control for average Americans.
His "explanation" here is a total sack of crap. He want's to outlaw all guns and has proven it time and again. Also he brings up the same old BS about gun shows and internet. He makes me want to puke.
Last edited by Finster; 03/03/2007:35 AM.
I BELIEVE IN MY GOD, MY COUNTRY AND IN MYSELF.
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: Finster]
#6790429 03/03/2007:35 AM03/03/2007:35 AM
Do you guys believe we should not have background checks? What good are background checks if every gun sale does not include one?
A huge problem is that criminals breaking our gun laws are not prosecuted. No law will work when that is the case.
There are already background checks. You can't walk into a gun shop or go to a gun show ANYWHERE in the country and buy a firearm without a background check. Right there tells me that Bloomberg and you too for that matter have no idea what you are talking about. The one and only exception to that rule is private sales of long guns, in some states handguns and if you sell a gun to a felon, underage or mental case and they can prove you knew they were a felon, under age or mental case, you will also get to visit "club fed". It's all BS and laws are already on the books.
Last edited by Finster; 03/03/2008:13 AM.
I BELIEVE IN MY GOD, MY COUNTRY AND IN MYSELF.
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: Finster]
#6790450 03/03/2008:10 AM03/03/2008:10 AM
Do you guys believe we should not have background checks? What good are background checks if every gun sale does not include one?
A huge problem is that criminals breaking our gun laws are not prosecuted. No law will work when that is the case.
There are already background checks. You can't walk into a gun shop or go to a gun show ANYWHERE in the country and buy a firearm without a background check. Right there tells me that Bloomberg and you too for that matter have no idea what you are talking about. The one and only exception to that rule is private sales of long guns, in some states handguns and if you sell a gun to a felon, underage or mental case and they can prove you knew they were a felon, under age or mental case, you will also get to visit "club fed". It's all BS and laws are already on the books.
This is the "TRUTH". WE have the laws, the revolving doors of justice just don't enforce them.
NRALIFER,PRPA LIFER,HUNTER,FURTAKER
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: Finster]
#6790470 03/03/2008:29 AM03/03/2008:29 AM
I like how he said he needs protection because he is wealthy. Bahaha. I think the American people have had enough and Trump will win again. Trump 2020!!!
No Jab.
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: gryhkl]
#6790481 03/03/2008:47 AM03/03/2008:47 AM
Do you guys believe we should not have background checks? What good are background checks if every gun sale does not include one?
A huge problem is that criminals breaking our gun laws are not prosecuted. No law will work when that is the case.
I'll agree to that when we have background checks prior to procreational sex to prevent child abuse. We also need mandatory sterilization and one sex act per month to control rampant sexual crimes.
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: Finster]
#6790486 03/03/2008:50 AM03/03/2008:50 AM
Avoided the question, like the rest of the liars. What about his backing and money, and the gun control issues in virginia. Wasn't it his money that got those politicians elected in virginia, in turn to have them push his agenda.
Good part is they said on fox he has already spent five hundred million on his campaign, bye bye money.
I'd be real surprised if this country elects a jew any time soon. Ask the mormon how he did.
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: Finster]
#6790533 03/03/2009:43 AM03/03/2009:43 AM
Excellent question, and a terrible answer. Totally changed the subject. Background checks have absolutely nothing to do with the question that was asked. What a goon.
Re: Bloomberg Tries to Defend Using Armed Guards
[Re: Finster]
#6790541 03/03/2009:51 AM03/03/2009:51 AM
Don’t know of a State that you can buy a gun online and have it not go to a FFL dealer like he was saying, made it sound like the internet did not apply when that law was made up. Total lies then a 12 year old could buy one is another lie. Criminal steal guns or buy stolen guns they don’t go buy guns and pay full price like legal people do that would be insane.
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!