Re: wildlife services, western Oregon
[Re: newhouse114]
#7747743
12/19/22 01:34 PM
12/19/22 01:34 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
beaverpeeler
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
|
^^ I'm surprised to hear that. You sure? Around here they seem to go to great lengths to stay out of the fracas on those kinds of things.
My fear of moving stairs is escalating!
|
|
|
Re: wildlife services, western Oregon
[Re: super cub]
#7747871
12/19/22 04:53 PM
12/19/22 04:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2021
Louisiana
MattLA
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2021
Louisiana
|
Wy. You are mistaken ws took no stance in Colorado No stance means they did not support trappers, which is the same as voting against AND we can be real honest about them using M44 bringing completely unwanted heat and attention to trappers. Zero reasons for anybody to use cyanide on animals in 2022, 100% should be outlawed, very shameful actually. They killed 812 gray fox, 6,653 coyotes, 68 red foxes and a few other all by M44 devices. They also killed 25k beaver, which just shows the point that WS is actually hurting recreational trappers and nuisance wildlife trappers ability to take care of their families.
|
|
|
Re: wildlife services, western Oregon
[Re: super cub]
#7747873
12/19/22 04:56 PM
12/19/22 04:56 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Minnesota
Muskeg
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2016
Minnesota
|
Wy. You are mistaken ws took no stance in Colorado Exactly. Didn’t do darn thing to stop it. Made sure that they could grow their empire and ensure they could come to the rescue of big ag.
|
|
|
Re: wildlife services, western Oregon
[Re: super cub]
#7748013
12/19/22 07:22 PM
12/19/22 07:22 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Co.-Wy. part time AK.
wy.wolfer
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Co.-Wy. part time AK.
|
Wy. You are mistaken ws took no stance in Colorado Incorrect, I know for a fact. It was very quiet. I was very involved in that fight. And yes, publicly they appear to be neutral, maybe they learned a lesson on that one. But I still don't forgive them.
Last edited by wy.wolfer; 12/19/22 07:56 PM.
|
|
|
Re: wildlife services, western Oregon
[Re: newhouse114]
#7748135
12/19/22 08:53 PM
12/19/22 08:53 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2021
Louisiana
MattLA
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2021
Louisiana
|
I’m guessing that most of don’t know that federal and most State employees are PROHIBITED by law of taking a side in any political situation. I bet the state agency in Colorado didn’t take a side either. If fur prices warranted trapper effort to handle damage situations, wildlife services would probably fade away. But that is not the case. That is an intentional misleading statement, because Federal Agencies and State Agencies are NOT prohibited by any law from providing input or a statement of position to Legislators either through their Director, Secretary or Commissioner. The state agency definitely "took a side" in Colorado and it was to support the trappers, why? Because no matter how any of the employees in the state agency feel, that is where they get their primary funding from, only a few states provide funding from the General Fund to state Wildlife Agencies. In other words, foothold trap bans means less trappers which means less funding for the State Agency. Just to make it very clear, I don't think anybody expects a Wildlife Services employee who wants to remain employed to speak out and provide an opposing opinion to legislators that are debating a trapping ban in the state. You see there is always a provision that precludes federal and state agencies from those rules, and Wy Wolfer nailed it right on the head. However what wont last forever is that WS operating in Colorado while normal trappers or ADC cannot, I can assure you of that.
Last edited by MattLA; 12/19/22 09:03 PM.
|
|
|
Re: wildlife services, western Oregon
[Re: MattLA]
#7748156
12/19/22 09:11 PM
12/19/22 09:11 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Sugar Grove, WV
JTfromWV
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Sugar Grove, WV
|
Wy. You are mistaken ws took no stance in Colorado No stance means they did not support trappers, which is the same as voting against AND we can be real honest about them using M44 bringing completely unwanted heat and attention to trappers. Zero reasons for anybody to use cyanide on animals in 2022, 100% should be outlawed, very shameful actually. They killed 812 gray fox, 6,653 coyotes, 68 red foxes and a few other all by M44 devices. They also killed 25k beaver, which just shows the point that WS is actually hurting recreational trappers and nuisance wildlife trappers ability to take care of their families. Most livestock producers in my county are fine with Wildlife Services using M-44s.
|
|
|
|
|