No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
expanded pans #7827054
03/22/23 04:26 PM
03/22/23 04:26 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,686
Williamsport, Pa.
J
jk Offline OP
trapper
jk  Offline OP
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,686
Williamsport, Pa.
WHY? I am old and from the era when they used to cut pans smaller, that makes more sense to me. Now adays I just leave them alone. Besides getting more toe catches what is the advantages of the big pans?.......jk


Free people are not equal. Equal people are not free. What's supposed to be ain't always is. Hopper Hunter
Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827067
03/22/23 04:43 PM
03/22/23 04:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Law Dog Offline
trapper
Law Dog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
I replaced a lot of rectangular pans with smaller round pans in the past the 1.5 1.75 Victor and 1.5 #2 B/L coil pans were interchangeable just to mention a few that I swapped I agree bigger is not better.


Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!

Jerry Herbst
Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827085
03/22/23 05:23 PM
03/22/23 05:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,870
Pennsylvania
P
patrapperbuster Offline
trapper
patrapperbuster  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Sep 2020
Posts: 1,870
Pennsylvania
I agree for the most part except for mink traps. You will catch more mink with the expanded pans


Till that day.....
Re: expanded pans [Re: patrapperbuster] #7827115
03/22/23 06:39 PM
03/22/23 06:39 PM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Law Dog Offline
trapper
Law Dog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Originally Posted by patrapperbuster
I agree for the most part except for mink traps. You will catch more mink with the expanded pans



Agree on the mink with the smaller feet and all more so with larger traps.

Last edited by Law Dog; 03/22/23 06:40 PM.

Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!

Jerry Herbst
Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827163
03/22/23 07:55 PM
03/22/23 07:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
Lot of trappers back then and even today didn't study physics too well. Outside of buried bait sers where guys buried the bait directly under the trap did it make sense to cut down the pans.

Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827172
03/22/23 08:04 PM
03/22/23 08:04 PM
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,401
WI
B
BvrRetriever Offline
trapper
BvrRetriever  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,401
WI
It makes all kinds of sense to leave pans alone!! Make them bigger and you will have problems.

Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827263
03/22/23 10:31 PM
03/22/23 10:31 PM
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,331
The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane Offline
"HOSS"
Leftlane  Offline
"HOSS"

Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,331
The Hill Country of Texas
Larger pans work great for EXPOSED bobcat sets. By seeing a pan that looks like the perfect (usually only) place to step, the cat centers his foot up. No toe catches, no paws pushed out.


“What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.”
Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers


Re: expanded pans [Re: BvrRetriever] #7827272
03/22/23 10:41 PM
03/22/23 10:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
Originally Posted by BvrRetriever
It makes all kinds of sense to leave pans alone!! Make them bigger and you will have problems.

If you install them incorrectly or dont level the pans. Toe catches arent from bigger pans. Ive donf the experiments with dead coyotes to prove it. Even on my hair triggered dogless traps

Re: expanded pans [Re: SNIPERBBB] #7827276
03/22/23 10:49 PM
03/22/23 10:49 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 10,126
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
"Callie's little brother"
Yes sir  Offline
"Callie's little brother"
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Posts: 10,126
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB
Originally Posted by BvrRetriever
It makes all kinds of sense to leave pans alone!! Make them bigger and you will have problems.

If you install them incorrectly or dont level the pans. Toe catches arent from bigger pans. Ive donf the experiments with dead coyotes to prove it. Even on my hair triggered dogless traps

Dead coyote feet don't step on a pan anything like a live coyote foot. Bigger pans do cause toe catches. If you don't think coyotes standing on the pan and the jaw causes toe catches what physically happens that does?

Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827298
03/23/23 01:04 AM
03/23/23 01:04 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,616
Oregon 66
bfflobo Offline
trapper
bfflobo  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,616
Oregon 66
Big pans, not for me, makes no sense. Can see them for mink maybe, but not needed there either.


Clean traps,tight lines,straight shooting
http://i.imgur.com/3sawxE9m.jpg
Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827356
03/23/23 07:02 AM
03/23/23 07:02 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
Originally Posted by Yes sir
Originally Posted by SNIPERBBB

If you install them incorrectly or dont level the pans. Toe catches arent from bigger pans. Ive donf the experiments with dead coyotes to prove it. Even on my hair triggered dogless traps

Dead coyote feet don't step on a pan anything like a live coyote foot. Bigger pans do cause toe catches. If you don't think coyotes standing on the pan and the jaw causes toe catches what physically happens that does?

Because you cant fire the trap in that situation! Not possible. All the weight will be on the jaw of the trap and none on the pan. For that to happen, the pan must be above the jaws of the trap or the coyote has to flex its toes downwards. When the pressure shifts off the jaws to the pan as it moves forward, the trap will fire. Foot is going down so unless your using a 1.5 a full pad catch occurs.

Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827366
03/23/23 07:30 AM
03/23/23 07:30 AM
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,182
Eau Claire Wi
Trap Setter Offline
trapper
Trap Setter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 4,182
Eau Claire Wi
Here is a video I did a number of years ago. Not scientific by any stretch of the imagination so take it for what it's worth, which isn't much.



Life sure is tough when you don't learn from the mistakes of others.
Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827372
03/23/23 07:33 AM
03/23/23 07:33 AM
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,314
East Texas
B
BTLowry Offline
trapper
BTLowry  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 4,314
East Texas
I have one MB550 with an expanded pan on it to try and catch a bobcat but don't think I would even try and catch a coyote with it.

I do know that it takes a lot less pressure out on the edge to set it off than in the middle of the pan which leads me to believe I will eventually end up with a skunk or even a squirrel laugh

Re: expanded pans [Re: BTLowry] #7827378
03/23/23 07:42 AM
03/23/23 07:42 AM
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,535
Saginaw, Mi
M
micheal Offline
trapper
micheal  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 6,535
Saginaw, Mi
Small pan for me

Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827415
03/23/23 08:48 AM
03/23/23 08:48 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Law Dog Offline
trapper
Law Dog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 34,872
Central, SD
Yes everyone is right have a nice day. LOL Do what works for you.


Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!

Jerry Herbst
Re: expanded pans [Re: jk] #7827437
03/23/23 09:43 AM
03/23/23 09:43 AM
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,956
South metro, MN
C
Calvin Offline
trapper
Calvin  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 5,956
South metro, MN
Not sure what you're targeting but I was told I would get more toe catches on coon when I swapped out all my 1.5s to big pans..and I was actually expecting that. I got the exact opposite: Less snapped traps and substantially less toe catches...And these traps were set up for mink and rats with zero added tension. BUT I don't run hair triggers. If you run hair triggers maybe that's the reason for toe catches (what I found anyhow...and why I don't run hair triggers...or anything even close).

I had a buddy that swapped his pans out at the same time and he said he got the same results as I did.

Re: expanded pans [Re: BTLowry] #7827440
03/23/23 09:50 AM
03/23/23 09:50 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,635
Rodney,Ohio
Originally Posted by BTLowry
I have one MB550 with an expanded pan on it to try and catch a bobcat but don't think I would even try and catch a coyote with it.

I do know that it takes a lot less pressure out on the edge to set it off than in the middle of the pan which leads me to believe I will eventually end up with a skunk or even a squirrel laugh

Still takes 2-3,# on a 4# center tested pan. What was used in the video above couldn't of been more than 3 oz? Dont think most guys would want to set traps up for coyotes like in that video... you'd get pinched alot bedding the trap. My traps when a possum or coon get in them, the possims are buried back foot catches and most of the coo. Are other than the odd big boar, which is not much over 15# here.

I would love to see a video of a a force plate used to see how much peak pressure when walking each critters puts on a foot. Id wager on coyotes is much closer to 10# than 2# that seems ro be the standard.

Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread