| 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: Osky]
 #7837804
 04/04/23 08:37 AM
04/04/23 08:37 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  Dec 2014
 west virginia usa
randall brannon
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Dec 2014 
west virginia usa
 | 
New Ulm Minnesota is pretty far south however they have observed wolves moving as far south as Iowa. Not many but some.
  I would think Raptors would be an issue as well, a 7lb fawn isn’t much of a struggle for a golden or even bald eagle. Interesting how people seem to love raptors and primary canines the rest of the critters be darned.
  Northern MN I think will take the biggest hit. Wolves and other large canines have knocked the deer down pretty bad which in turn has taken the wolf population down a notch. This has given the coyotes just enough breathing room to start populating here again. Just what the deer didn’t need not to mention newborn moose calves. Law Dog I’m surprised at your noting aerial hunting being of poor success. There are still some guys in the western states who put a serious hurt on coyotes from the air. Maybe those state guys need to take lessons or get someone like Boone… up in those birds.
  Osky Look at Wisconsin. You have a hard time finding a Deer track anymore after releasing those wolves. Now they are finding them as far South as Milwaukee county. Wolves will move on after they kill all of their food. In Wisconsin Dairy Farmers are not even allowed to shoot them when they attack their Herd. Only the Indians on their reservation are allowed to. That is why Farmers are donating young Bulls to them to lure the wolves onto the reservation and the Indians shoot them.  
 
  
God please keep they 19 fallen UBB miners out of trouble up there.
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: randall brannon]
 #7837806
 04/04/23 08:40 AM
04/04/23 08:40 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2007
 Northern Minnesota
BernieB.
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Jan 2007 
Northern Minnesota
 | 
New Ulm Minnesota is pretty far south however they have observed wolves moving as far south as Iowa. Not many but some.
  I would think Raptors would be an issue as well, a 7lb fawn isn’t much of a struggle for a golden or even bald eagle. Interesting how people seem to love raptors and primary canines the rest of the critters be darned.
  Northern MN I think will take the biggest hit. Wolves and other large canines have knocked the deer down pretty bad which in turn has taken the wolf population down a notch. This has given the coyotes just enough breathing room to start populating here again. Just what the deer didn’t need not to mention newborn moose calves. Law Dog I’m surprised at your noting aerial hunting being of poor success. There are still some guys in the western states who put a serious hurt on coyotes from the air. Maybe those state guys need to take lessons or get someone like Boone… up in those birds.
  Osky Look at Wisconsin. You have a hard time finding a Deer track anymore after releasing those wolves. Now they are finding them as far South as Milwaukee county. Wolves will move on after they kill all of their food. In Wisconsin Dairy Farmers are not even allowed to shoot them when they attack their Herd. Only the Indians on their reservation are allowed to. That is why Farmers are donating young Bulls to them to lure the wolves onto the reservation and the Indians shoot them. Wow. Just wow.  
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: nate]
 #7837860
 04/04/23 10:08 AM
04/04/23 10:08 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  Nov 2012
 midland, michigan
midlander
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Nov 2012 
midland, michigan
 | 
Coyote's eat and or prefer to eat what they grow up eating, don't no about there but around here that's about the only game we have left for them to eat and the deer numbers are as low as we've seen since the reinter duction. Farming practice is the main couplet for wildlife decline. No beaver,muskrat, rabbit, turkey, quail, pheasant,skunk, opossum, raccoon on decline, only thing increasing around here is farm chemicals.  You got a source for all these claims?  Never seen an agricultural area where raccoons were in decline, especially in  a weak fur market. ..  
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: midlander]
 #7837896
 04/04/23 10:44 AM
04/04/23 10:44 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2007
 Northern Minnesota
BernieB.
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Jan 2007 
Northern Minnesota
 | 
Coyote's eat and or prefer to eat what they grow up eating, don't no about there but around here that's about the only game we have left for them to eat and the deer numbers are as low as we've seen since the reinter duction. Farming practice is the main couplet for wildlife decline. No beaver,muskrat, rabbit, turkey, quail, pheasant,skunk, opossum, raccoon on decline, only thing increasing around here is farm chemicals.  You got a source for all these claims?  Never seen an agricultural area where raccoons were in decline, especially in  a weak fur market. .. Any where farming is the primary use of the land, raccoons populations have plummeted in the past 20 years. There is no habitat for them as the old groves, farm houses, and fencerows are being removed and there is nothing but crop land from road to road.  
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: AugustZaczkowski]
 #7837908
 04/04/23 10:52 AM
04/04/23 10:52 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  May 2018
 SW Georgia 
Wanna Be
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  May 2018 
SW Georgia 
 | 
I’m in a high percentage agricultural area and before the tornado of 2017 and the hurricane in 2018, our Turkey population was on the great side of the scale. Everything else rebounded after those events except turkeys.  If our deer population was any higher it would be dangerous, lol. I sometimes wonder if it wouldn’t hurt to not take coyotes, but they just don’t prey on deer. If coyotes left turkeys alone I probably wouldn’t even target them, but they don’t so I trap them.  I may be wrong, but I see fawns being born based on the population. Our does generally produce one (high density), sometimes twins, and on very rare occasions they’ll have triplets. On areas with low density populations I’ll consistently see twins and triplets. I guess mother nature knows what is best for the land.  I wouldn’t say we are a high density predator area, at least not areas I trap, then again it could be because I trap. I see more predator sign on our WMA’s. When I get rich or have enough money to waste I may submit an application to trap one, right now it would cost way more than I want to put into it. 
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: midlander]
 #7837921
 04/04/23 11:11 AM
04/04/23 11:11 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2007
 Northern Minnesota
BernieB.
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Jan 2007 
Northern Minnesota
 | 
Bernie, I guess ag land is different in different regions.  Around here, the healthiest raccoons are still found in agricultural areas and they dont have any problems finding a place to lay their head.  Again, not questioning your ag lands, but that is simply not the case around here. Drive through the midwestern states and what I'm talking about will become very obvious. Ditches have been straightened and cleaned, groves have been removed, fencerows have been torn out, farm places and barns have been torn down, not a tree in sight. Plant every inch is the name of the game in these days of high land prices.  
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: AugustZaczkowski]
 #7837950
 04/04/23 11:48 AM
04/04/23 11:48 AM
 | 
 
Joined:  Dec 2010
 Armpit, ak
Dirt
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Dec 2010 
Armpit, ak
 | 
"I read a while ago that something like 60% mortality in fawns was a max to maintain herd size."
  This would be complicated to assess. It would depend on the adult doe survival rate and twinning and pregnancy rates.  I could see a world in which 80 to 85% fawn mortality would result in a stable doe population. 
 
  
Who is John Galt?
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: midlander]
 #7837968
 04/04/23 12:08 PM
04/04/23 12:08 PM
 | 
 
Joined:  Jan 2018
 MN
Donnersurvivor
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Jan 2018 
MN
 | 
Bernie, I guess ag land is different in different regions.  Around here, the healthiest raccoons are still found in agricultural areas and they dont have any problems finding a place to lay their head.  Again, not questioning your ag lands, but that is simply not the case around here. We have large areas of "Black Desert" here. Nothing but subsidized crops as far as you can see and when they till its basically a black desert, great farmland, poor wildlife habitat for most species.  
 
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
Re: Deer Depredation Study
[Re: AugustZaczkowski]
 #7838008
 04/04/23 12:52 PM
04/04/23 12:52 PM
 | 
 
Joined:  Dec 2010
 Central, SD
Law Dog
 
 
trapper
 | 
 
  
 
trapper 
 
Joined:  Dec 2010 
Central, SD
 | 
Passed through central MN several years back picking up a prisoner from Federal custody and I was shocked at the lack of habitat with a lack of tree belts or idle ground was non existent the only animal sigh was a few rat huts in the ditches. 
 
  
Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
  Jerry Herbst
 |  
 
 | 
 
 
 | 
 
 
 
 
 |  
 
 |