Supposed ethics violation.

Which is a big nothing burger because plain and simple per the United States Constitution SCOTUS answers unto itself not the other two branches. The only recourse for removal of a justice is impeachment.

There is a reason our founders designed SCOTUS to have lifetime appointment and total autonomy.

We need to be pressuring our congress critters to keep their hands off the court.

Attempting to delegitimize the court so they can justify packing it.

If he was accepting favors we should know.
just

What is the difference in a favor and lobbyist straight up giving money to congressmen?

Something is rotten in Denmark.

Why?

So folks can slander and smear?

So the justices become subject to the fickle whims of the court of public perception?

Nope, none of our concern as we don't elect the justices. We elect those who would impeach them.

Just a matter of time

I want to go to war with these people. Literally.

You want to go to war "with" them or "at" the them.

At. Tired of them.

Me too, Posco! Sick of the stupidity.

Seems obvious to me their intentions are to beat us into submission, lee. We've seen their goonsquads at work. No hint they intend to back off. I'm ready and willing to meet them head-on.

That’s 4 out of 50,000 or so registered here. Doing the math, that is about 28,000 of us across the country. Could tear up a lot of stuff with that number and keep it supplied for some time.

Maybe. But don't over commit. Y'all are pretty busy with all of your internet posting.

Because that would undoubtably favor his decisions.
Sounds like you want your court judges to be paid off. Some would call that crooked.
just

They are going after him because of his wife!!!! She donated money to the Republicans. Geez!!! Get some facts!!!

Why is this so easy for you to believe, yet hunter and joes china connections are just a fairytale to you?

They are a fairytale to me?????
FWIW they wern't a supreme court judge.
just

I'm still wondering who the SCOTUS leaker is? With less than 100 clerks and only 9 justices, one would think .gov would have no problem tracking them down. Didn't seem to have that problem tracking down January 6th "insurrectionist ".

My money is on Sotomayor and they are keeping it in house for that reason. Otherwise it might prompt either an impeachment, not likely, or embolden the dims to be even more activist from the bench. If it was a justice there is zero that can be done short of impeachment.