Imagine that?

Rules for thee.

Shocker!

Did anyone with any brain matter really think he'd actually be charged much less convicted?

The way it should be.

I predicted this a year ago...

He still has to own it in the end

What goes around comes around……remember that the next time you loose your cool …..Alec!

Real but...
Unreal

It is and should be a civil matter. Not criminal.

This doesn't surprise me.

explain? the man pointed a loaded gun at another person, pulled the trigger. You can be charged with Brandishing, and not even have a gun.

Should of never been charged in my opinion.

I agree. He did do the killing, but it would not have happened if the people responsible for the gun and bullets have had done their job. The ones that need to be held accountable are the people in charge of gun and bullets.

I'm not a baldwin fan at all.

sort of misleading headline , which is par for the course

https://apnews.com/article/baldwin-manslaughter-charged-dismissed-c4b2928da21ee4ff00a51d2e4eddd7dc

the charge of manslaughter was dropped.

I don't have any question he honestly believed he was holding an unloaded gun. even though he should have known otherwise.

the real issue , is that as an employer the executive producer of the film as well as an actor in the film , when the conditions on set were know to be unsafe and he didn't take the action to ensure the safety of the employees.

this is more like if you worked in a warehouse and there had been several issues with the brakes being bad on fork trucks 3 had already failed and the president of the company came out from his office because production/shipping had stopped and decided to get a rush order out hops on a fork truck with a lock out tag on it removes the lock out tag and then starts loading the order , he is in a rush and runs over 2 employees , kills one , severely injures the other because his plan had been down shift and he hadn't the time.

is it manslaughter , not exactly

is it a really bad decision resulting an employees death because he had a time line he was trying to keep to keep from loosing money.

I think those people are still being held accountable. Their charges weren't dismissed as far as I know.

That is a shame the guilty go free and the dead woman crying from her grave.

As it is always the case with the woke crown. Blame someone else. Or the gun did it. Thats why its called gun violence and not people violence.

The First thing in gun safety, when someone hands you a gun , you pop out the drum on a revolver or check the mag and chamber on a semi auto or pull the bolt back etc. all the time every time. Takes a couple of seconds ... failing to do that and its all yours if things go south from there

that is where the lines blur a bit , the Chief firearms guy had walked off set , quitting over the unsafe conditions and the production companies unwillingness to do anything about it.

the executive producer promoted the firearms persons assistant to lead and they may not have had the experience nor knowledge

the proper thing would have been to stop and make the set safe , a full inventory , ensure no more live rounds were anywhere on set , make the guns incapable of feeding and fireing live rounds as is the standard in hollywood film making.

you see because they were shooting the movie in rural NM and not CA they didn't follow the most commonly accepted and CA Hollywood required procedures for arms on set policy


they had gone out and made purchases of off the shelf live firearms to use on a movie set , why? budget , they were cutting corners big time.

then members of the crew were taking the guns off into the desert to shoot live ammo

there should have never been live ammo on the set in the first place , they again cut corners and knowingly neglected safety protocol.

so what is the company and it's executive producer , who also fired the shot , liable for ?

This

but he (alec) was the boss of the people who handled the guns and bullets and that guy did tell him it was not safe , he told them they needed to stop ,Alec decided they are not stopping production to fix the issue , and the guy quit so he wouldn't be the one charged when they killed some one and they went on any way , and then Baldwin killed someone as predicted by the guy who left an unsafe work site quitting to keep from being hung out to dry when their recklessness killed someone.

so then the assistant of that guy who know he had to leave or get hung is getting hung out now.

so if your crane operator says no way full stop , this has to be fixed first the company refuses and he said well I am not going to be responsible for killing a co-worker and quits and walks off the site and they promote the guy who is the assistant crane guy to run the crane and exactly what the crane operator said would happen happens and someone does at the job site , then what.