Again...I read the indictment.  You and I both know how grand juries work.....one-sided all the way. And the wording of that indictment has a lot of "he said...she said" garbage in it. 
As an attorney, I know you can see that...if you even read it.
He will be acquitted.
 I think  it  is going to  be  interesting  and  educational.
  The fact  that the  prosecutor chose   Miami  as  the  venue  to  file  this  case  is  puzzling to  me.
 Dade  county  went 46%  for  trump in  the  2020 election. That  COULD  mean   that  a  potential 5  jurors   out  of  12  could  be  Trump voters.  It would  only  take  one  to  produce a  hung  jury.
  On  the  other  hand  we  could  conclude that  the  prosecutor  believes he  has  a  slam dunk  case  that  will  certainly end  with  a  conviction.
I  fully  expect Trumps  lawyers  to  question  the  validity of  the  search  warrant. So    discovery  could  be definitive  in  this  case.  
On  the  third  hand......there  are  at least two  of Trumps  lawyers  who  have  testified  to  the  grand  jury  exposing the  fact  that  Trump lied  to  his  own  lawyers  !!   What  defendant in his  right mind  does  that ?
I  also  expect  to hear  more  about  the   FBI/prosecutors  offering  Trump's  lawyer  a  judgeship  as  inducement to flip  on  Trump.   This  may  be tied  to  whether or not  the  search  warrant  was valid.
The indictment  is  certainly  one-sided  by  design.  But  I  would  be  willing to  bet  that no  prosecutor  is going  to "lie"  in  an  indictment.   He  could  be easily proven  wrong  and  not  only  lose  his  case  but  have  bigger  problems   with the  court itself.   It  won't  surprise me  either to see  some of the  charges  dropped.
 I don't  believe  we should   conclude  that the  indictment  is the  product  of  Trump's  enemies.........although  the  motives behind  it  may  be. Clearly  some  Trump  allies  have given  testimony  under  oath that sure  doesn't  help Trump.
Many  of  us  were  appalled,  rightly  I  believe,  when  Hillary  was given a  pass  on  her illegal  server.   Biden  too  was  shown to  have  classified  documents illegally.   
But IMO  we  should  not  now  embrace   Comey's   awful  statement  clearing Hillary, just  because  it  is  Trump   who could  benefit  from it.  It  was  wrong  when  applied  to  Hillary and  we  should  not  now  try to  use  that  "wrong"  to  excuse  Trump.  If  nothing  else  we  should  at least be  consistent.
I  didn't want Hillary  as  president  or Biden  either.   Now  I  don't  want   Trump  if  he is  willing  to act  just like  those  others   where  the  law  is  concerned.