Now you can see how they are bribed for their votes. This independent Jounalist crunched all the numbers and came out with this shocking report.

Nancy is one of,,,, if not the best individual stock traders going historically

It pays to pay attention too her trades


Following her recent nvda trade has been very profitable,,,,,,,,,,,, taking profits tomorrow

Look up Ross Givens. He explains the congressional connection to making money in the market.

He also gives free, online seminars on how to follow what stocks members of congress purchase and how to capitalize on that.

All legal. And all public information.

I've never watched "Mr. Smith goes to Washington" but I have a pretty good idea these folks would have starring roles in a remake.

I guess I must be dense but I don't see how anyone is "bribed".

Lets say Congress says they are working on legislation to police AI in the future and they need information from the various companies. They are given the information (possibly under threat of anti-trust or federal trade law suits) and some individuals use that information to trade.
Yes I think Congress should be prohibited from that activity but I don't see any bribes.

As far as Greenwald's outrage about some one making 200% on his portfolio.........Big deal ! What you aren't told is the value of the asset the member of congress bought. Without that context it is nothing more than propaganda. Brian Higgins could have bought ten dollar's worth of some penny stock and sold it for 30 dollars. Now he has a 200% gain.

The fact is that he bought Nvidia in 2017 and Unusual Whales ESTIMATED what his portfolio is worth. It says so right at the top of that graphic that Greenwald shows. Back in 2017 NVDA was trading anywhere from 24 to 175 dollars a share. Higgins has reported in required documents that his portfolio consists of two stocks and the total value is less than 100,000 dollars.

So tell me again where the bribe is.

Absolutely sleazy to use non-public info that you can coerce from companies but that doesn't mean that public companies are bribing legislators. Legislators are corrupt enough without anyone's help

I wouldn't call it a bribe either.

What's wrong, and is what I've heard Pelosi does is buys into a company she knows they're going to give a contract to or pass a bill that benefits that company.

I agree Brian

Why wouldn't that be considered insider training?

They're exempt. A bill gets put up once in awhile to change that, one not long ago was being talked about but it never passes.

https://www.congressionalinstitute.org/2018/08/16/can-members-of-congress-engage-in-insider-trading/

I guess they figure if their trading is published somewhere, its not insider trading?

It certainly is . There is a bill that was introduced last year ...Ban congressional Stock Trading Act........I don't know the status of it. But for congress it has not been illegal to engage in insider trading

Elizabeth Warren is the latest pusher of the ban on congressional members trading

Like most native Americans,,, she’s not that good at negotiating

Not only are they making money off policy that effects the market, they are also bribed by the companies themselves, getting insider trading info only CEOs are privy to, for policy favors of course.
They get their belly scratched and back rubbed at the same time. Total corruption. I am not buying they are making millions off penny stocks lol

What’s everyone’s predictions on Nvdia’s earnings on Wednesday??

I’m leaning bust,,,,

, lol

So I don't get it. That link Hippie posted says it is illegal I think?

Of course they aren't making millions on penny stocks. That was my example to indicate how deceptive the video is because it provides no context as to asset values.

Is it really so outrageous that a member of congress..or anyone else.............. owns a hundred thousand dollars worth of a stock he bought 7 years ago ?

You're certainly leaps and bounds more knowledgeable on this topic than I am, but my guess is that they will either make or exceed the estimated earnings.

Yes its outrageous, It Should be illegally for congress to trade, but I believe they allow insider trading for themselves, but not us. Who told you they were all bought seven years ago ? I dont buy that either. Many have been in congress decades anyway.

It’s had a huge run up recently,,,,, due for a pull back??

Competition from AMD??

AI bubble??


Taking some profits tomorrow. Nobody goes broke taking profits