Re: Steiner glass?
[Re: white marlin]
#8153908
06/12/24 03:02 PM
06/12/24 03:02 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
|
dad has a pair loves them his are mid 1990s military ones $$$ but it is really clear
Last edited by GREENCOUNTYPETE; 06/12/24 03:04 PM.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
|
|
|
Re: Steiner glass?
[Re: white marlin]
#8154033
06/12/24 06:27 PM
06/12/24 06:27 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Mo.
1cav
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2007
Mo.
|
Got couple Steiner rifle scopes, had since early 90's good scopes. For bino's own Swarvoski. Remember buying first set in 94, seller said to me, how many prs., of bino's have you owned, buy these last set you will ever need.Have been used for hunting, scouting, etc. Broke down last week bought pr., of SLC 15x56, for spotting mounted on tripod, for shooting, had a Vortex Razor spotting scope, was to darn bulky, and heavy to lug around. Considered Steiner, Zeiss, not much in price difference, looked thru Zeiss, no dealers close for Steiner, went with Swarvorski, tried and proven, plus there warranty is excellent . Had years of use with mine only thing eye piece cracked, called Swarv, had new ones in a week. Swarv 8x40, sit side by side with 16x56, in safe
Last edited by 1cav; 06/12/24 06:29 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Steiner glass?
[Re: white marlin]
#8154185
06/13/24 12:29 AM
06/13/24 12:29 AM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Idaho
bearcat2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2011
Idaho
|
I have a pair of Steiner Nighthunter 10x50 binoculars. I love them for guiding, they gather more light than anything else I have used, are very clear and comfortable to look through for long periods. They are also very bulky and heavy, which makes them not nearly as nice when I am hunting myself and packing my rifle, etc. And because of their bulk are more likely to get in the way of a quick shot opportunity. I also own a pair of 8x28 compact Steiners, forget the model (not their Predators), I would never recommend them, obviously with that kind of an objective size I didn't expect phenomenal light gathering abilities, but the clarity sucks, colors seem washed out and whatever they used for lens coating (if anything) sucks, if there is light anywhere close to shining at the lens the glare makes it almost impossible to pick anything out through them.
Their high end binos are very good, much better light gathering than Zeiss (the wife has Zeiss binos, super crisp, clear image; but VERY disappointed in the light gathering). The model I have (which is long discontinued) is better than anything I have used for light gathering, including Swarvorski and Leica, and on par with the other top brand glass I have looked through for clarity. That being said, if I was buying new binoculars today, I would probably go with Vortex Razor 10x40s, also very clear, excellent light gathering ability, if a bit less than my Nighthunters, they seem to have a slight advantage over the Swarvorskis I have used in that department, while being considerably cheaper and also less bulky. They are half the size and probably less than half the weight of my current binoculars.
|
|
|
|
|