I’ve seen both sides of the argument on arrow and broadhead weights and both come down to being able to hit the spot. Supposedly the heavier weight allows for bone penetration whereas the lighter weights tend to fail. And by bone I mean straight shoulder bone. Granted, I’ve seen mechanicals that have gone through one shoulder and exited behind the other, but the physics behind the heavier weights prove they perform at a higher percentage of the time.
Ranch Fairy is extremely knowledgeable and a bit arrogant, but he knows his stuff. I don’t shoot super light arrows, but nothing like what he promotes. I also prefer fixed, cut on contact blades, but will shoot mechanicals for does. Again most all my shots are under 30yds and generally in a brush limb free area. I don’t shoot in brush or thread needles. A deer ain’t that important to me, lol.
No don't get me wrong I do find the whole high FOC arrow thing very interesting and I was actually eating some of ranch fairies video the other night and ..idk one second I'm enjoying him next I'm like " dude please shut up and get to the point !" Dont think imma get super crazy about it though. Think I'll just try to middle ground it.
What I am really curious about is thee claims that a larger percentage of animals don't run or don't run as much with these high FOC arrows as with super light and fast ones. It always really interested me watching videos where someone would poke a deer or pig and they would either just keep over or run off a few yards look around and just fall... Anytime I've asked about this though in archery groups.....well, would just walk away wishing I don't ask ..
Now will say I have been enjoying listening to all the Ashpy lectures. Not sure how I feel about most of if I'll go all crazy with his methods but it's very interesting