Re: Teal #s
[Re: conibearguy]
#8199929
08/20/24 06:38 PM
08/20/24 06:38 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,118 Sumner, Mo.
claycreech
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,118
Sumner, Mo.
|
![[Linked Image]](https://trapperman.com/forum/attachments/usergals/2024/08/full-8206-227430-img_4129.jpeg) For what’s it’s worth……….. I don’t have much faith in these reports anymore.
Last edited by claycreech; 08/20/24 06:39 PM.
|
|
|
Re: Teal #s
[Re: claycreech]
#8199988
08/20/24 08:45 PM
08/20/24 08:45 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 12,182 Iowa
trapdog1
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 12,182
Iowa
|
They’ve showed up in North Missouri. Nope big numbers yet, but that’s good. Our season doesn’t open till 9/7. I'm gonna try to keep a few from making it down to ya, Clay!
|
|
|
Re: Teal #s
[Re: claycreech]
#8200255
08/21/24 09:23 AM
08/21/24 09:23 AM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,323 NE
conibearguy
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,323
NE
|
![[Linked Image]](https://trapperman.com/forum/attachments/usergals/2024/08/full-8206-227430-img_4129.jpeg) For what’s it’s worth……….. I don’t have much faith in these reports anymore. My question is, how accurate are these reports? I feel like on some of the down year, I have some of my best hunts whether it's teal season or big duck. Seeing more greenwings on the landscape would be sweet though. I felt like I already saw more on the landscape last season.
|
|
|
Re: Teal #s
[Re: claycreech]
#8200440
08/21/24 03:52 PM
08/21/24 03:52 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,323 NE
conibearguy
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,323
NE
|
Keep in mind that this is the breeding pair survey. This takes into zero account the numbers hatched.
Remember when they set the season and limits about this time of the year every year to take into account for the hatch? They don’t do that anymore. Too much politics and big money involved today in the duck world.
Example of the stupidity……. Next year we get to kill 3 pintails daily, despite their numbers showing long term decline. The justification is with their numbers being down, hunters kill less, therefore they can let us kill more. I heard it straight from someone on the flyway council.
Whatever……. These biologists ain’t what they used to be. I was under the impression that will be based off of what the hatch did this year. So we possibly could bag three next year or is could be zero. I heard those were the numbers it would be, and it would depend on the year.
|
|
|
Re: Teal #s
[Re: Trapper7]
#8201404
08/22/24 09:26 PM
08/22/24 09:26 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 21,015 MN
160user
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 21,015
MN
|
IMO, teal are the best eating duck. Yep and that is because they are small so there is less to eat.
I have nothing clever to put here.
|
|
|
Re: Teal #s
[Re: Snare loop]
#8201835
08/23/24 02:46 PM
08/23/24 02:46 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,323 NE
conibearguy
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,323
NE
|
Do you see in the DU magazine the hunting articles are all DU top management. Hunting on the Chesapeake bay. Flooded timber down south, potholes in Canada.
High duck number surveys = more members= more cash= more lavish trips. On the same path as the NRA that i have been a Life Member of since 85.
With the amount of money they collect they could have bought every pothole in South Dakota yet they own around 120 acres in that state for public hunting.
So concludes my rant for day. I am a member of DU (right or wrong), but truthfully if you care about waterfowl management, I think Delta Waterfowl is the right group to join. The research and conservation they are doing seems to be like their money is geared towards the right thing.
|
|
|
|
|