Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8360788
03/09/25 10:53 AM
03/09/25 10:53 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 49,553 Northern Maine
Bruce T
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 49,553
Northern Maine
|
Been trying to get Sunday hunting here in Maine for years.
NRA,NTA,MTA,FTA
#1 goal=Trap a wolverine
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8360833
03/09/25 11:57 AM
03/09/25 11:57 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746 Wisconsin
Muskrat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746
Wisconsin
|
We all deal with some regulation in our home state that's ridiculous. Have you ever done anything to get something changed? I have not. I think that's gonna change. I'm gonna start this year. 1. Submitted CC resolution to change trap tag law from name/address to choice of name/address or DNR Customer ID #. Went through the process and became law. 2. Submitted CC resolution to change ice fishing shanty law from displaying name/address when not in use to choice of name/address or DNR Customer ID #. Went through the process and became law. 3. Submitted CC resolution to change voluntary trapper ed to mandatory trapper ed in 1990. Went through the process and became law in '92. 4. Submitted CC resolution to change common statewide opener of mink/muskrats to present 3-zone system. Went through the process and that's what we have today. 5. Submitted CC resolution to change law to allow cutting willow with a diameter of 2 1/2" in diameter or smaller for personal use (noncommercial) such as trap stakes. Became law but one must obtain approval from DNR property manager prior to harvesting. 6. Worked with DNR to allow the following: A bodygrip trap is not a submersion set when more than one-half of the trap is located above water after the trap has been fired. Was before the trap fired initially. This would have excluded my suspended bodygrips in mink trails on vertical river banks that fall to the water and submerge once fired. Still working on the colony trap fiasco . . .
Lifetime member of WTA and NTA
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8360842
03/09/25 12:03 PM
03/09/25 12:03 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746 Wisconsin
Muskrat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746
Wisconsin
|
and a big one in case Gary doesn't see this . . .
The Beav was the primary driver to allow nonresident trappers into Wisconsin from states that allow reciprocity. Wisconsin now allows trapping by non-resident U.S. citizens from those states that allow Wisconsin residents to purchase non-resident licenses and trap in that state; this includes all states except Hawaii, Minnesota and Washington D.C. A MN resident may trap 7 species of furbearers on their own property they own here in WI, but that list does not include fisher or bobcat.
Lifetime member of WTA and NTA
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8360853
03/09/25 12:24 PM
03/09/25 12:24 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 21,412 Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 21,412
Green County Wisconsin
|
I have presented to the county a 2A resolution it really didn't go any where once Lafayette county passed it Green county board of supervisors was sure anything they did was a bad idea, that was basically how they worked at the time.
I got trapping re-opened on some public property along the river here , I showed up to enough meeting I got myself on committee overseeing public safety in town matters as well. that was 8 years ago. so my writing is in a bunch of local ordinance. and for every 1 passed , I bet I help stop 5 requests for a overly restrictive ordnance that doesn't belong here.
I have submitted and presented one CC resolution to extend racoon season and ground nest predator removal.
America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: Muskrat]
#8361136
03/09/25 07:50 PM
03/09/25 07:50 PM
|
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,367 Green Bay, Wisconsin
tlguy
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2013
Posts: 3,367
Green Bay, Wisconsin
|
6. Worked with DNR to allow the following: A bodygrip trap is not a submersion set when more than one-half of the trap is located above water after the trap has been fired. Was before the trap fired initially. This would have excluded my suspended bodygrips in mink trails on vertical river banks that fall to the water and submerge once fired.
Still working on the colony trap fiasco . . .
Off topic, but does this open the gates for a 330 in 2" of water as long as it falls over after it fires?
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: tlguy]
#8361140
03/09/25 07:58 PM
03/09/25 07:58 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746 Wisconsin
Muskrat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746
Wisconsin
|
6. Worked with DNR to allow the following: A bodygrip trap is not a submersion set when more than one-half of the trap is located above water after the trap has been fired. Was before the trap fired initially. This would have excluded my suspended bodygrips in mink trails on vertical river banks that fall to the water and submerge once fired.
Still working on the colony trap fiasco . . .
Off topic, but does this open the gates for a 330 in 2" of water as long as it falls over after it fires? Page 7 in the regs, last bullet . . . No person may set, place, or operate any bodygrip trap that is 75 square inches or larger, unless 1/2 of the trap is located underwater at all times.
Lifetime member of WTA and NTA
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: Muskrat]
#8361437
03/10/25 10:05 AM
03/10/25 10:05 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,948 WI
WIMarshRAT
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,948
WI
|
[quote=WI Outdoors] Still working on the colony trap fiasco . . .
Is it time to push on this some more?
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to dance in the rain!
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WIMarshRAT]
#8361444
03/10/25 10:20 AM
03/10/25 10:20 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746 Wisconsin
Muskrat
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,746
Wisconsin
|
[quote=WI Outdoors] Still working on the colony trap fiasco . . .
Is it time to push on this some more? Find out Friday/Saturday.
Lifetime member of WTA and NTA
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8361550
03/10/25 01:32 PM
03/10/25 01:32 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,151 Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 12,151
Armpit, ak
|
Yes. Does not always work, but sometimes it does. Used to work real hard at it. I'm retired now. Not my future. I'm letting the young guys screw things up now. 
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8362009
03/10/25 11:27 PM
03/10/25 11:27 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,948 WI
WIMarshRAT
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,948
WI
|
We all deal with some regulation in our home state that's ridiculous. Have you ever done anything to get something changed? I have not. I think that's gonna change. I'm gonna start this year. What you looking at changing WI Outdoors? My neighbor asked me to write him a resolution to change the rules about leaving decoys in the water on private ponds. No reason he can leave decoys on shore but can’t on the water. I guess it has been tried in past but failed. Anyone know the issue in past? The DNR already has a definition for private ponds so it would just be adding that exception.
Life isn't about waiting for the storm to pass...it's about learning to dance in the rain!
|
|
|
Re: Regulations
[Re: WI Outdoors]
#8362096
Yesterday at 05:53 AM
Yesterday at 05:53 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 15,582 Michigan
Trapper Dahlgren
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 15,582
Michigan
|
yes I have ,learned the hard way, talk with every DNR, person from bottom to top about our nuisance beaver's law got nowhere for 4 years, then I talk with commissioner [nrc] and he told me to bring it to a NRC meeting had 5 minutes to speak, 2 min, into my time chairperson stop the clock and they started asking me questions, she could not believe that we were killing our beaver and had to throw away the animals, she said along with the other NRC, that this would change, and it did, now I'm working on our turtle reg's,
|
|
|
|
|