From irresponsible clueless gun owners to taking Canada. Good grief.
What make you think the US can successfully “take” any country, 1st, 2nd or 3rd world.

From irresponsible clueless gun owners to taking Canada. Good grief.
What make you think the US can successfully “take” any country, 1st, 2nd or 3rd world.

What makes you think your opinion on our gun laws carries any weight.

[quote][A lawful gun owner won't own a semi-auto with a detachable magazine in colorado ( to use a recent example)./quote]

A person can't even own a 1911 .45 ACP in Colorado....?

I wonder how many people out east on the plains or on the west side of the mountains actually just ignore such ....?

How many guns are in your country and how much ammo. We have more guns 393 million in civilian hands than you have people 40 million. And ammo to feed them.

What makes you think your opinion on our gun laws carries any weight.

Canadians whine about the liberal agenda in their own country, while simultaneously backing liberal agendas in ‘Merica.

Go figure.

Governor here in Maine just wants boys beating up on girls in girls sports and outlawing plastic bags.

The whole "lawful gun owner" line is nonsense. If you're a lawful gun owner, you'll comply with any gun control foisted upon you, because that's what's lawful. A lawful gun owner won't own a 30 round magazine in a state with a 10 round limit. A lawful gun owner won't own a semi-auto with a detachable magazine in colorado ( to use a recent example). If Vinke wants to be a lawful gun owner he'll comply with the laws mentioned in the OP. A lawful gun owner will comply with whatever nonsense rule the ATF comes up with regarding pistol braces, barrel length, etc. Be willing to be an unlawful gun owner.

Easier to get a gun illegally here too. All I was saying is that a little bit of training can't hurt, maybe that's covered in hunter ed courses?

Some guys get their panties in a knot when I post on non trapping topics and it derails all the way to asymmetrical warfare and the same stupid comments because they don't know what to say. Some others here back up their statements and they hold validity. The dummies should let the ones who know speak for them.
I try to avoid off topics, but sometimes I'm bored.

shakey jake the problem is who decides what and when is appropriate. Same with mental health checks

May start out well but get an anti gun administration and it will changes fast.

Good example is hunter education. Took my daughter through it when she was 5. for 3 years they can get an apprentice license after that must have hunter ed card. So about 8 years old for the oldest boy he is out of apprentice license and I call to schedule the class only to be told he was to young it's geared to 10 year Olds and he could take the class but not get a completion card. So if you start kids out at 5 or 6 they would be to young and not be able to get a hunter ed card or hunt for a year or two according to that guy.

My how things changed. Called for a different class location put on by different people and they said no problem and there is leway given to the instructors and the other guy was just a jack leg that put on the classes i called about. .

Every family is different. My kids were shooting rifles, shotguns, and hand guns at a young age. Heck they had shot several different machine guns, 338 lapua and 50 big rifles before they were 10. Have a video somewhere of some of it my youngest was 8 the first time he shot a 50 bmg and 338 and 4 machine guns that day. All hear at home on my 500 yard range.

Basically they have more shooting experience on different platforms than you do

[quote=Providence Farm][quote=Shakeyjake]
Here we go again.
You don’t need no training, you’re Merican. It’s great that anyone down there can own a gun, but do you think anyone should?