No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Mercury vs Suzuki #8410962
05/29/25 11:19 AM
05/29/25 11:19 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
De
C
coop Offline OP
trapper
coop  Offline OP
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
De
Haven't done any homework yet... anyone have any thoughts or preference?

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410963
05/29/25 11:21 AM
05/29/25 11:21 AM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
I have a mercury 60hp on my boat, it’s decent


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410965
05/29/25 11:30 AM
05/29/25 11:30 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
Asheville, NC
C
charles Offline
trapper
charles  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Aug 2010
Asheville, NC
20 years ago I would have said Mercury. Not up to date on outboards now. Have you considered Yamaha, which are excellent.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410969
05/29/25 11:42 AM
05/29/25 11:42 AM
Joined: Nov 2015
OH
Catch22 Online content
trapper
Catch22  Online Content
trapper

Joined: Nov 2015
OH
Not sure what HP your after, I have some experience with small outboards. The smaller Mercury's are made by Tohatsu and are ok. I do prefer Suzuki over them. IMO, the Suzuki's are better made and run like a top. A buddy bought a new Suzuki 9.9 a few years back and it's a great motor as well. Here's my little 2.5, best motor I've ever had.

[Linked Image]


I wonder if tap dancers walk into a room, look at the floor, and think, I'd tap that. I wonder about things.....
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410972
05/29/25 11:48 AM
05/29/25 11:48 AM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
Originally Posted by coop
Haven't done any homework yet... anyone have any thoughts or preference?

what size HP and use


America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410974
05/29/25 11:54 AM
05/29/25 11:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2010
Central, SD
Law Dog Offline
trapper
Law Dog  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2010
Central, SD
Most smaller outboards are made by the same manufacturer just rebadged to the orders they get to build them.

Tohatsu Builds a lot of engines kind of like MTD build lawn mowers.

Last edited by Law Dog; 05/29/25 12:13 PM.

Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!

Jerry Herbst
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410975
05/29/25 11:55 AM
05/29/25 11:55 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
beaverpeeler Offline
trapper
beaverpeeler  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
I have run 4 cycle Hondas, Yamahas and Suzukis. All are decent...my next one will be another Yamaha though.


My fear of moving stairs is escalating!
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410977
05/29/25 11:58 AM
05/29/25 11:58 AM
Joined: Oct 2023
OR
W
wws Offline
trapper
wws  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Oct 2023
OR
Had a friend that had a Suzuki on a big off shore boat, always made it home. Didn’t burn a lot of fuel, was a great motor. I have a 20 Suzuki on a Jon boat it runs great. I would have rather had a 25 on it but bought it used.

wws

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410978
05/29/25 11:59 AM
05/29/25 11:59 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
De
C
coop Offline OP
trapper
coop  Offline OP
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
De
GCPete... I have a 02' 60 Merc I bought new... been a great motor. I'm gonna need new controls and power trim soon. I can get a new 60HP Suzuki w/ controls, SS prop, tach, and cables all installed out-the-door for $7690.
I have it on a 19' Lowe Big Jon CC. Inshore fishing, crab trot lining and setting pots mainly.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410998
05/29/25 01:08 PM
05/29/25 01:08 PM
Joined: Nov 2010
USA-WI
K
Kre Offline
trapper
Kre  Offline
trapper
K

Joined: Nov 2010
USA-WI
I've had 60 HP Merc 4-strokes since 2001. I've put hundreds of hours on them and never had a single problem.

I know guys that ran big Suzuki on charter boats. They all had problems and finding good techs was difficult. They took them off and put Yamaha's on...a very costly endeavor.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8410999
05/29/25 01:16 PM
05/29/25 01:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
NC - Here there and everywhere
C
coondagger2 Offline
"Brat"
coondagger2  Offline
"Brat"
C

Joined: Dec 2012
NC - Here there and everywhere
The bigger Suzuki's got a bad reputation early on due to how sensitive they were to propellers and how few techs there were that knew them well. Now guys have had them long enough that they know how to set them up for the best performance. A lot more techs around for them now too.

I have owned them all, and if I had to buy an outboard of any brand tomorrow it would be a Suzuki closely followed by a Yamaha.

I wouldn't even mention Mercury in the conversation


Gotta live up to the nickname...
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411000
05/29/25 01:20 PM
05/29/25 01:20 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
G
gcs Online content
trapper
gcs  Online Content
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
What dealers do you have near you.... I run Hondas commercially, excellent motors but you pay a premium, Suzukis are good, but a pain to do routine maintenance on, at least the older ones, you needed to remove the bottom cowl to change the oil filter. Yamaha also has a good following. Don't discount Tohatsu if you have a dealer nearby, very good motors and much less expensive than the big three.....Mercury?, eh, not a fan, especially the big ones, the small ones are most likely rebadged Tohatsus....
This is for mid size motors, no experience with the little ones.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411009
05/29/25 01:56 PM
05/29/25 01:56 PM
Joined: Nov 2007
St. Cloud, MN
trapperkeck Offline
trapper
trapperkeck  Offline
trapper

Joined: Nov 2007
St. Cloud, MN
I have a 2023 Suzuki 25hp with power tilt/trim, electric start, etc. Runs great, maintenance is easy in mine, I did have to make a plastic funnel to drain the oil to keep it from running down the leg. Not a big deal. I would recommend.


"The voice of reason!"
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411011
05/29/25 02:18 PM
05/29/25 02:18 PM
Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Turtledale Offline
trapper
Turtledale  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Mercury outboards 30hp and below are made by Tohatsu in Japan and are very reliable.


NYSTA, NTA, FTA, life member Erie county trappers assn.,life member Catt.county trappers
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411013
05/29/25 02:23 PM
05/29/25 02:23 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
I don't know what is better / best I like my 2 Yamahas but they are 2 stroke , Dad and brother both have Yamahas brother has a 2 stroke 150 and dad has a 4 stroke 225

I have a 15 Johnson 2 stroke

and all I really know is , my next motor is going to have power tilt I don't mind a tiller at all , but power tilt is getting to be something I really want.

the rpm up down fine adjust on the new Yamaha's is really nice , and would be perfect for finding that trolling speed

that came out just after Dad's Yamaha and moving the throttle to try and get 650-750 rpm is very hard and that is where it trolls about perfect.
not sure if everyone has that feature now but for trolling would be really nice.

Last edited by GREENCOUNTYPETE; 05/29/25 02:26 PM.

America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411016
05/29/25 02:33 PM
05/29/25 02:33 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
G
gcs Online content
trapper
gcs  Online Content
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
My 60 Honda has that "fine tune " rpm thingee but I've never used it...It has a tiller and electric start of course and trim and tilt, which I highly recommend!
Cool thing about it is if you go overboard and can't get back into the boat, you can use the motor mounted tilt switch to power you up out of the water enough to get back in....Don't ask how I know this...lol

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411017
05/29/25 02:35 PM
05/29/25 02:35 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Eastern Shore of Maryland
bad karma Offline
trapper
bad karma  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Eastern Shore of Maryland
have had merc's for 60 years but the next one will be yamaha.


Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411027
05/29/25 03:52 PM
05/29/25 03:52 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
Originally Posted by coop
GCPete... I have a 02' 60 Merc I bought new... been a great motor. I'm gonna need new controls and power trim soon. I can get a new 60HP Suzuki w/ controls, SS prop, tach, and cables all installed out-the-door for $7690.
I have it on a 19' Lowe Big Jon CC. Inshore fishing, crab trot lining and setting pots mainly.



how is the 60 merc for power on the 19 foot when you have it loaded down?

is that a 2 stroke or 4 ?

just wondering because it is the minimum recommended motor for the 1860cc lowe now , they seemed to have dropped the 19' and the 20' they suggest a 90HP minimum


America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411033
05/29/25 04:21 PM
05/29/25 04:21 PM
Joined: Mar 2023
WI
WI Outdoors Offline
trapper
WI Outdoors  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2023
WI
Suzuki

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411042
05/29/25 04:43 PM
05/29/25 04:43 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
De
C
coop Offline OP
trapper
coop  Offline OP
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
De
GCP... very seldom have it loaded, usually 3 max people and a couple of coolers, plus 1200' trotline gear. I've never felt under powered and seldom run over 3/4 throttle.
I got 2 quotes from fairly local dealers... one was $7690 and the other $10,345, $2655 difference for the exact same thing... both long time dealers. Shouldn't be that much difference IMO. Both quotes were for the Suzuki 60.
4 stroke

Last edited by coop; 05/29/25 04:44 PM.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: bad karma] #8411043
05/29/25 04:45 PM
05/29/25 04:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by bad karma
have had merc's for 60 years but the next one will be yamaha.


Still run an old tower of power on one skiff.
We used to say,,,,, if it ain’t black,,, you ain’t fishing..

I am using a couple Susie’s now ,,,, love one hate the other.
4 stroke outboard with a jet pump suck…


Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411050
05/29/25 05:10 PM
05/29/25 05:10 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
Originally Posted by coop
GCP... very seldom have it loaded, usually 3 max people and a couple of coolers, plus 1200' trotline gear. I've never felt under powered and seldom run over 3/4 throttle.
I got 2 quotes from fairly local dealers... one was $7690 and the other $10,345, $2655 difference for the exact same thing... both long time dealers. Shouldn't be that much difference IMO. Both quotes were for the Suzuki 60.
4 stroke


I would be curios which dealer sells mostly pleasure boats and both of their proximity to water.
or who has the big fancy show room to pay for.
just a curiosity as to why one would be 2655 different unless one has a new old stock 23 or 24 motor to sell you and the other is specking a 25.


America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411058
05/29/25 05:27 PM
05/29/25 05:27 PM
Joined: Dec 2008
eastern WV
R
Ridge Runner1960 Offline
trapper
Ridge Runner1960  Offline
trapper
R

Joined: Dec 2008
eastern WV
Suzuki all day!

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411061
05/29/25 05:31 PM
05/29/25 05:31 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Don’t use shorts marine Coop.


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: DelawareRob] #8411091
05/29/25 06:56 PM
05/29/25 06:56 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Eastern Shore of Maryland
bad karma Offline
trapper
bad karma  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by DelawareRob
Don’t use shorts marine Coop.


why not ?


Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: Vinke] #8411092
05/29/25 06:58 PM
05/29/25 06:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Eastern Shore of Maryland
bad karma Offline
trapper
bad karma  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by Vinke
,,,,, if it ain’t black,,, you ain’t fishing..


Same here plus very very good service guy close but now retired. He told me to buy yamaha.


Never argue with a fool - they will drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411108
05/29/25 07:13 PM
05/29/25 07:13 PM
Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
A
AK Timber Tramp Offline
trapper
AK Timber Tramp  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Nov 2024
Alaska
I’d go with the Suzuki between the two. I like Hondas personally, they’ve been pretty trouble free for me

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: bad karma] #8411112
05/29/25 07:22 PM
05/29/25 07:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
DelawareRob Offline
trapper
DelawareRob  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2013
East of the Mason-Dixon Line
Originally Posted by bad karma
Originally Posted by DelawareRob
Don’t use shorts marine Coop.


why not ?


Service department is terrible. They don’t stand behind their work and even if it’s under warranty, they take forever to do it and don’t do it correctly. Or maybe it’s a one off that happened.


Stop over cooking your meat! It isn’t gamey, it’s over cooked!

Gordon Ramsey, maybe…
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411121
05/29/25 07:36 PM
05/29/25 07:36 PM
Joined: Sep 2023
MO
C
Crappiekiller Offline
trapper
Crappiekiller  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2023
MO
This is a 2011 Mercury 60/40 factory jet 4-stroke. That boat/motor has accounted for well over 10,000 fish between catfish/bass/suckers. I have done absolutely nothing to the motor other than routine maintenance.

[Linked Image]


CK
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411123
05/29/25 07:38 PM
05/29/25 07:38 PM
Joined: Sep 2023
MO
C
Crappiekiller Offline
trapper
Crappiekiller  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Sep 2023
MO
I’m not sure if there is even a Suzuki mechanic at the Lake of the Ozarks that I could get one serviced or parts. Our local Mercury mechanic is very good.


CK
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411191
05/29/25 09:46 PM
05/29/25 09:46 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Snow Hill, MD
J
JoMiBru Offline
trapper
JoMiBru  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Jan 2007
Snow Hill, MD

Majority of the commercial crabbers/aquaculture clammers here ( myself included ) use Suzuki. They’ll beat the heck out of them, stack thousands of hours on them and when they blow, buy another. I’m on my second Suzuki , it’s a 60 with 1100 hours, runs great. Use it almost daily. I do the services that I can handle. Such as lower unit oil, water pump and impeller, motor oil , racor filter and zincs.

Had a clammer tell me everytime he took a motor for a service, it’ll cost about a grand. So he runs them hard with very little maintenance ( borderline neglect ) saves the service fees over the years, and just buys another when it quits. Figures the money he saved over the years would pay at least half the cost of a fresh motor. These aquaculture clammers on VA eastern shore go daily on the tide, and that’s what got my attention. Their whole fleet is Suzuki’s.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuke [Re: bad karma] #8411200
05/29/25 10:18 PM
05/29/25 10:18 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Vinke Offline
trapper
Vinke  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
NWWA/AZ
Originally Posted by bad karma
Originally Posted by Vinke
,,,,, if it ain’t black,,, you ain’t fishing..


Same here plus very very good service guy close but now retired. He told me to buy yamaha.


Yep… old man Dave Clark was the best…. Sons got it now a won’t even work on anything with a carb….

Last edited by Vinke; 05/29/25 10:21 PM.

Ant Man/ Marty 2028
just put your ear to the ground , and follow along

Re: Mercury vs Suzuke [Re: coop] #8411215
05/29/25 11:02 PM
05/29/25 11:02 PM
Joined: Sep 2016
MB
J
Jurassic Park Online content
trapper
Jurassic Park  Online Content
trapper
J

Joined: Sep 2016
MB
I don’t have too many years experience with motors, but I did some research and bought a 6hp Yamaha 4 stroke for my little boat. Been using it for 5 or 6 years now.

Been a very good motor and very happy with it. I’ll stick with Yamaha when I upgrade my boat.

Last edited by Jurassic Park; 05/29/25 11:03 PM. Reason: Spelling

Cold as ice!

Clique non-member
Re: Mercury vs Suzuke [Re: coop] #8411226
05/29/25 11:41 PM
05/29/25 11:41 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Minnesota
330-Trapper Offline

trapper
330-Trapper  Offline

trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Minnesota
[Linked Image]


NRA and NTA Life Member
www.BackroadsRevised@etsy.com




Re: Mercury vs Suzuke [Re: coop] #8411282
05/30/25 07:29 AM
05/30/25 07:29 AM
Joined: Nov 2012
midland, michigan
M
midlander Offline
trapper
midlander  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Nov 2012
midland, michigan
I wouldnt be afraid of either of them, and a lot like chainsaws and tractors, it depends a lot upon the dealership support in the area. Personally, I wished Evinrude was still manufacturing outboards as their torque was unmatched by any of the 4-strokes. I currently run a Honda 30 on my fishing rig and have no complaints.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuke [Re: coop] #8411350
05/30/25 10:33 AM
05/30/25 10:33 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
De
C
coop Offline OP
trapper
coop  Offline OP
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2006
De
GCPete...Both small dealers w/ minimal "show boats" out front... both have small lots. Got a couple of reliable referrals from the $7690 guy, not so much from the other. He quoted me $8500 on a "used very little but like new" 2003 Mercury w/ an alum. prop... $200 more for SS... Already told the 1st dealer to put it on, gave him a deposit yesterday... he said 2 -3 weeks backlog... no problem, I'm still riding.
Rob... did you know Price Honda bought out Short's Marine???
(never used Short's for anything except a set of wheel bearings 15 yrs. ago)

Last edited by coop; 05/30/25 10:40 AM.
Re: Mercury vs Suzuke [Re: coop] #8411351
05/30/25 10:40 AM
05/30/25 10:40 AM
Joined: Feb 2021
Wisconsin
M
Mad Scientist Offline
trapper
Mad Scientist  Offline
trapper
M

Joined: Feb 2021
Wisconsin
Originally Posted by coop
GCPete...Both small dealers w/ minimal "show boats" out front... both have small lots. Got a couple of reliable referrals from the $7690 guy, not so much from the other. He quoted me $8500 on a "used very little but like new" 2003 Mercury w/ an alum. prop... $200 more for SS... Already told the 1st dealer to put it on, gave him a deposit yesterday... he said 2 -3 weeks backlog... no problem, I'm still riding.


I was told 3 days to get my 60 Suzuki and got it 2 months later.The fancy tiller was supposedly hard to get.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411361
05/30/25 11:15 AM
05/30/25 11:15 AM
Joined: Jan 2019
Northern IN USA
Flipper 56 Offline
trapper
Flipper 56  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2019
Northern IN USA
I have about all of the brands except Suzuki, in my opinion the problem with any of them comes from using gas with ethanol, I don't have problems with 2 strokes or 4 strokes, but if you run ethanol, it draws moisture and that is the root of all the troubles. It also does not mix well with oil in the 2 strokes. Mercury says not to use it in their engines.

Last edited by Flipper 56; 05/30/25 11:16 AM.

"Where Can A Man Find Bear Beaver And Other Critters Worth Cash Money When Skinned?"

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411378
05/30/25 12:09 PM
05/30/25 12:09 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Northern Maine
Bruce T Offline
trapper
Bruce T  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Northern Maine
Love my little 2hp Suzuki boat motor.Light and powerfull for the size.Can hold easily with one hand.
[Linked Image]


NRA,NTA,MTA,FTA

#1 goal=Trap a wolverine
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: midlander] #8411380
05/30/25 12:25 PM
05/30/25 12:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Turtledale Offline
trapper
Turtledale  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Originally Posted by midlander
I wouldnt be afraid of either of them, and a lot like chainsaws and tractors, it depends a lot upon the dealership support in the area. Personally, I wished Evinrude was still manufacturing outboards as their torque was unmatched by any of the 4-strokes. I currently run a Honda 30 on my fishing rig and have no complaints.

Yep OMC motors (Evinrude/Johnson) were darn near bullet proof. So many still running in boats all these years later.


NYSTA, NTA, FTA, life member Erie county trappers assn.,life member Catt.county trappers
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411470
05/30/25 05:46 PM
05/30/25 05:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2007
Goldsboro, NC
John C Offline
trapper
John C  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2007
Goldsboro, NC
I’ve always run Yamahas but would definitely run a Zuke over a Mercury.


More Cowbell
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411672
05/30/25 11:45 PM
05/30/25 11:45 PM
Joined: Dec 2013
St. Croix County, Wisconsin
T
ToTheWoods Offline
trapper
ToTheWoods  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2013
St. Croix County, Wisconsin
I used to have a Merc on all my boats but when I spec'd out a new boat a few years ago the dealer friend of mine suggested the Suzuki. First for me is always reliability then would be price. Had nothing to go on for reliability except word of mouth but the price difference was almost $8k for the 200hp and the 9.9 kicker. Went with the Suzukis and am really glad I did. Warranty on the Suzuki is 6 years vs. I think 3 on the Mercury. Pushes my 20' Alumicraft Trophy 195 at 47mph. Never had an issue with either motor and I average about 40 hrs on the big motor and 120 hrs on the 9.9 annually and these motor are 8 yrs old. They are a little sensitive to spark plugs after 30-40 hrs on the big HP motors but I have just gotten into the habit of changing them annually.

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411678
05/31/25 12:15 AM
05/31/25 12:15 AM
Joined: Dec 2011
Washington
C
cat daddy Offline
trapper
cat daddy  Offline
trapper
C

Joined: Dec 2011
Washington
Yamaha. Period!

Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411710
05/31/25 06:39 AM
05/31/25 06:39 AM
Joined: Dec 2013
Northern MN
O
Osky Offline
trapper
Osky  Offline
trapper
O

Joined: Dec 2013
Northern MN
Last summer I did long days in a fishing camp using new 15hp electric start 4 stroke Mercury motors on new Lund flat floor 16’ aluminum boats.
Just got back from 5 days running brand new Yamaha’s 15hp 4 strokes on aluminum boats. The Mercurys were quieter and more powerful far and away. Much more pleasurable to run.

Another guide I know runs Suzukis, his biggest is 30hp, nice motors but make sure there is a good repair shop nearby. Not that they break down more but there are very limited resources for that brand, he does all his own work on them due to that.

Fall before last I bought a brand new 60hp Mercury tiller 4 stroke for an 18’ boat I guide with in the states.. I couldn’t be more impressed with a motor. It’s a pleasure to use and purrs down to 1.8 mph trolling while running at mid 30’s with two adults aboard.
They all have come a long way, I’ve run a lot of Hondas as well. At this time I’m running Mercury. I’d add that of the tillers which I use mostly the Mercury has far and away less vibration than any other. That means a lot when you have your hand on it all day, and shows me the engineering is well focused. Less vibration in anything mechanical is a good thing.
All are good, I wish you the best in your personal choice.

Osky



www.SureDockusa.com
“ I said I don’t have much use for traps these days, never said I didn’t know how to use them.”
Re: Mercury vs Suzuki [Re: coop] #8411734
05/31/25 07:53 AM
05/31/25 07:53 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
G
gcs Online content
trapper
gcs  Online Content
trapper
G

Joined: Dec 2006
coastal ny
Look at what most commercial guys use....Hondas, zukis, and some yamahas, (Here), There's a reason for that... grin

I used to run Tohatsus because I had a good local dealer, good motors and less money, we finally got a new Tohatsu dealer and if this Honda wears out before I do I'll probably switch.
I could have saved 2,000 dollars when I bought this last 60 Honda. But the dealer was local and these motors are bullet proof....and I need them to just work with simple maintenance

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread