I found this interesting. Thought you people that think the Bible is false would like to see this.

And remember, no one doubts Plato, or Aristotle, or Homer ever lived, so why do people doubt that Jesus lived when is much more evidence for his life than the others?

Even most secular historians agree that Jesus was a real person that lived in Israel about 2000 years ago. What they disagree on is whether or not he was the Son of God that performed miracles and died and came back to life.

Still waiting on your 6000 year timeline

Did you know Jesus was a common name back then?
Why do you think Judus had to kiss Jesus?
So the guards knew which Jesus to arrest, because there was more than one in the garden that night

But there is only 1 Jesus that picked up a guards ear and healed him! Pretty sure they knew then they got the right Jesus........what you think.

curious how you know there was more than one Jesus present in that time and place...

could it be that Judas had to kiss Jesus because the soldiers didn't know Him personally? He was surrounded by 12 other guys.

I bet Malchus had a tough night sleeping after a day like that and receiving the compassion of Christ directly and physically.

Peter James and John were with Jesus - can't find any reference to the other 9 being present - I am open to scripture though - please show me if I am in error

Copying a document well in no way whatsoever means that document is truthful. What a bizarre thought process.

Keith

C'mon, modern MSM says the exact same thing over and over and over. You mean it's NOT true?? LOL

It doesn't mean it's not true. It means nothing to the veracity at all.

Keith

trusting brakes to stop a vehicle often is also a bizarre thought process if you don't get out and take off all wheels and check your brakes every time - or we can live in faith.

Keith, yes, I agree 100%. Just because the same story is repeated the same way over and over, simply means its the same story. If the story is factual is completely unrelated to how it is told, and retold. Like so many family "legends". Passed down through generations, some true, some not.

Interesting that not one archeological discovery has disproved the Bible, but many have been discovered that prove the Bible's accuracy. Many rivers, mountains, valleys, cities, kings, battles, even scribes and priests.

This is true. I've also heard it said that we can use the Bible to verify the truthfulness of the Bible, or that the Bible proves itself to be true, which is also nonsense. If that were true, then we could also use Snow White and the 7 dwarves to prove that Snow White and the 7 dwarves is true.

Copying a document well over a long time period does mean, though, that we can eliminate the variable of a sort of "telephone game" thing where the text changes over time, and we can look at what we have today, and know that it's what the original document writers wrote, and that helps to understand the thought processes of the writers, and what they intended to say. Now, whether or not they were confused, lying, or actually believed what they wrote..............

Archeology has proven a lot of Biblical events that were previously thought to be myths true. But archeology also proves that mankind, and the world, has been around waaaaaaaaaay longer than 6000 years, which directly contradicts the Bible.

There's an entertaining genre of writing called Historical Fiction. In Historical Fiction pure fiction is merged with real people, places and events in time. It's generally an easier way to create a setting for the story being told, though good authors do a lot of research. Just because real people places and events are included doesn't make the work non-fiction.

Keith

I put no faith in the dating methods of evolutionists. Their date for the age of the earth has changed from 10,000 years in the beginning of their religion, to 4.5 billion years old now... that's a pretty big variable.

Once again I believe you don't understand what you are posting.

The last column..."Accuracy of Copies" does not mean that the content is true or accurate. It only means.......as Keith has pointed out .....that the 'copy' is 99.5% accurate compared to the source that was copied. I has nothing to do with validity or facts.
Case in point is the inclusion of Homer's Iliad. This is mythology about the Wars between Troy and Greece. It includes the intervention of the 'gods' Apollo, Athena, and Achilles. It is obviously not factual in that aspect..........but it was copied fairly well.

How has archeology proven any contradictions to the Bible? Dating of items has been shown to be in error. For example, million year old fossils(not truly) can be made in a few minutes with some heat and pressure - then carbon dated and come back millions of years old - when you just watched them being made.