The Supreme Court just ruled limiting nationwide injunctions by district judges. Major victory for the Administration on items of national importance. I'm wondering if it will affect the future rulings on trapping. For example, will it hinder judge shopping where a California based District Judge restricts trapping of wolves in the Great Lakes States? I hope so.

I was watching the rulings come out on scutus blog this morning. There was speculation there that things will shift to class action lawsuits to work around it. The courts will need to address qualifying a class to keep that from getting out of control.

The ruling was doubly rewarding when reading Justice Barrett's comments regarding justice Jackson's moronic dissent.

https://www.nationalreview.com/news...p-admin-punts-on-birthright-citizenship/

Jackson is an activist, not a Justice imo.

Kudos to Barrett

I agree with the ruling, but this opens the door to abusing individual rights. I always remember the strategy of McCain/ Feingold.

Jackson is a national embarrassment.

Lower courts and state legislatures have been ignoring SC rulings with impunity.
Doubt this will change much.

And may bite us when things flip the other way

Jackson is a diversity hire who doesn't even know what a woman is!

Downright catty in her scathing rebuke of Jackson. ACB, may be a neocon plant but she broke out the jurisprudence beatch on that one. It was spectacular.

Both Dem and GOP presidents over the last several administrations have not faired well with Federal district judges blocking many exec orders. There are 94 federal district judiciaries and only a handful get used, based on if it is a liberal or conservative iissue being judicated. The one thing I was hoping this SC decision would have done would have clarified the birthright issue better. Right now there are over half of our 50 states that were not even states when the 1`4th amendment was ratified and this opens up for all sorts of who is or who is not a citizen based on birthright. Hope they can or will get this resolved and quickly.

Bryce

Well, you know, hire the handicapped they say……..

Osky

Jackson isn't even fun to watch

The difference between a God and a Supreme Court Justice is God doesn’t think he’s a Judge is an old Fed saying.

THIS!!!

It is ridiculous for a judge from a different state that has no problem with wolves to be able to regulate and restrict the taking of wolves in a state that does have a problem.

There goes the 9th circuit side money from whoever needed court intervention.

We will see what happens when a president takes office and put out an executive order banning guns. Then what? It only takes one crazy fool to make things very interesting.

That's clearly a constitutional violation and would fall into the courts purview.

Somewhere, someplace - Soros is having a melt down, Lol.

Stated she was against and imperialist legislature.

Guess she has no problem with an imperialist judiciary.

A true national embarrassment. An activist with with a black robe.