We will see what happens when a president takes office and put out an executive order banning guns. Then what? It only takes one crazy fool to make things very interesting. [/quote]
That's clearly a constitutional violation and would fall into the courts purview. [/quote]

So is birthright citizenship. 14th amendment. And look at that controversy in the courts. Our rights are always getting walked on.

I hope Soros is having a really wonerful meltdown. the only thing better would be for me to be the one to evacuate his cranium. along with all of his concubines.......

Just like banning bump stocks. You won't be able to buy a gun in certain districts until the Supremes rule on it. So people in certain areas will have their rights violated until this works it's way to the Supreme court. This is the problem IMHO with trying to deal with nationwide policy one district at a time. However, it will feed a lot of lawyers.

So much peace and love

Maybe, but it creates a disparity that demands resolution that the Supremes can't just ignore. The other option is one district violating the rights of all and that can be ignored since all are getting screwed equally.

The courts are not determining the outcome. The courts are stopping an action, not producing an action. They are not screwing anybody that is not already being screwed.

Too nice for that person.

Oh I didn’t realize talking about murdering people was allowed as long as it’s people you don’t like. My bad

Short rope and a tall tree would be more fitting....

So the law of the land according to a former supreme court is that the Constitution says: The Fourteenth Amendment states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside"
, which has been interpreted to grant birthright citizenship to most individuals born in the U.S.

President takes an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution.

Then he E.O.s this right gone.

How do you deal with this? I don't know?

Dirt, I think it's really going to take a Convention of States to correct the error in thinking when this Amendment was ratified. I still would like to see the 17th removed from the Constitution.

He deserves it. The world would be a better place.

Wasn't this debated by congress that it was not for people coming in to the country but for slaves children?

Maybe? The Supreme court has made a ruling. It is the law. People can challenge the law. I'm not sure a President can violate the law to challenge it?

every Representative and Senator swears a similar Oath to the Constitution...

"John Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it" President Andrew Jackson

And Jackson most certainly did violate it. Marshall ruled the the Cherokee most certainly had the right to sue and keep their land, Jackson sent them to Oklahoma anyway.

SCOTUS, by design has ZERO enforcement power. Instead they rely solely upon the coequal branches either complying or not with recourse to impeachment as the corrective measure.

SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION THEREOF

There's the fine print everyone is conviently ignoring. These illegals are citizens of other sovereign nations subject to the laws of those nations. Heck, that Mexican jewess cartel mouthpiece has said as much when she speaks of her citizens in our country.

Nobody is ignoring that. They are in the U.S. and subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. This has been decided by a former Supreme court.

The court cannot impeach Presidents. Congress can, but won't while the President's party is in charge.

Define jurisdiction, please?

Under the power of local law? If so then any visitor could argue for citizenship or you might lose your's when visiting a foreign country.

I would opine under the naturalized jurisdiction as in born to a citizen as one might think of a Frenchman being French if born to French parents as a citizen of France as that is the closest thing we have as Americans to an ethnicity of our own.

BTW, you as a citizen are still subject to US legal jurisdiction no matter where you may be on the globe. Same for these illegals they are subject to the laws of their country of origin.

The grey area would be stateless persons as we saw at the end of WW2 but were not talking about that.