|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450498
08/07/25 07:16 PM
08/07/25 07:16 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
|
Been saying that for a long time. Not 5000fps but nothing new in spite of advertising by gun writers on each new wonderful development. Have to reinvent the wheel to keep selling. Scopes are seriously improved.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450516
08/07/25 07:47 PM
08/07/25 07:47 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
If they get the 7 backcountry mastered that will open the door to higher velocities with longer barrels but no bullets will be up to par. And barrel life might suffer. Right now accuracy is main game and I'm not sure there's a real need for higher velocities. What would be the gain in extreme velocities? With range finders and ballistic apps flat shooting isn't as important as it once was.
Last edited by Yes sir; 08/07/25 07:49 PM.
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Yes sir]
#8450518
08/07/25 07:48 PM
08/07/25 07:48 PM
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Blackduck Minnesota
Big Sam
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Aug 2012
Blackduck Minnesota
|
If they get the 7 backcountry mastered that will open the door to higher velocities with longer barrels but no bullets will be up to par. And barrel life might suffer. Right now accuracy is main game and I'm not sure there's a real need for higher velocities. What would be the gain in extreme velocities?
Folks want to kill stuff a mile away with a flatter trajectory.
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Big Sam]
#8450523
08/07/25 07:52 PM
08/07/25 07:52 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
If they get the 7 backcountry mastered that will open the door to higher velocities with longer barrels but no bullets will be up to par. And barrel life might suffer. Right now accuracy is main game and I'm not sure there's a real need for higher velocities. What would be the gain in extreme velocities?
Folks want to kill stuff a mile away with a flatter trajectory. With range finders and ballistic apps a flat trajectory isn't that important for extreme distance hit. The creedmoor is a slow cartridge but pretty accurate at longer ranges, ranges further that most people can make ethical shots on game. A thousand more feet per second is going to gain very range forgiveness at 4 figure distances.
Last edited by Yes sir; 08/07/25 07:55 PM.
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Big Sam]
#8450530
08/07/25 07:58 PM
08/07/25 07:58 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
Well Yes sir, you and I both understand that, but we also both know that as soon as they start writing up how flat it shoots and how far it kills, money will start changing hands real quick. Lol true words. People were jumping on the 7 BC before it was really proven if it works
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450539
08/07/25 08:14 PM
08/07/25 08:14 PM
|
Joined: Sep 2010
NE
Marty B
"arbitrary noob"
|
"arbitrary noob"
Joined: Sep 2010
NE
|
Everything in the world with the exception of firearms have progressed at an exponential rate. No company has bested the 220 Swift, 300 Weatherby, 264 WM etc. for 50+ years. The only thing that has change is the bullet ogive. Velocity is no better! Oh and they cut a couple inches off the tube. P.O.Ackley is spinning inn his grave. We should have velocities 5000fps by now. Its called a price point. People dont want to pay what it would cost.
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450545
08/07/25 08:24 PM
08/07/25 08:24 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
Get you a 30"+ barrel and you'll have speed.
Not fun to carry tho!
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450549
08/07/25 08:33 PM
08/07/25 08:33 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
|
Boy this is getting good. All I know the new stuff I've messed with is generally easier to deal with across the board vs a lot of legacy cartridges.....
But in the grand scheme of things when 60% of people are either nah dumping into berms or boiler rooming a deer at least the 100yd .... Does a lot of it really even matter ?
YouTube expert "The bird of Hermes is my name , eating my wings to keep me tame"
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Wolfdog91]
#8450552
08/07/25 08:36 PM
08/07/25 08:36 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
Boy this is getting good. All I know the new stuff I've messed with is generally easier to deal with across the board vs a lot of legacy cartridges.....
But in the grand scheme of things when 60% of people are either nah dumping into berms or boiler rooming a deer at least the 100yd .... Does a lot of it really even matter ? What's getting good?
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Yes sir]
#8450554
08/07/25 08:39 PM
08/07/25 08:39 PM
|
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
|
Boy this is getting good. All I know the new stuff I've messed with is generally easier to deal with across the board vs a lot of legacy cartridges.....
But in the grand scheme of things when 60% of people are either nah dumping into berms or boiler rooming a deer at least the 100yd .... Does a lot of it really even matter ? What's getting good? The thread ? What a guy can't enjoy a post talking about old stuff being better then new stuff
YouTube expert "The bird of Hermes is my name , eating my wings to keep me tame"
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: warrior]
#8450581
08/07/25 09:04 PM
08/07/25 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Scott__aR
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
|
Material science is still bound to the metallurgy of barrels and actions when dealing with pressure propulsion of projectiles.
The Army's new 6.8 had to fundamentally change the cartridge case in order to hold higer pressures.
^^^ this^^^ At much over 4000fps barrels start burning the throat.
Megapredator ... top of the food chain! Member of WTA Member of U.P. Trappers Member of NTA Member of FTA
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450582
08/07/25 09:04 PM
08/07/25 09:04 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Yes sir
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
|
I'm talking about new technology, not just stuffing more powder in a case. Same old brass case, barrel steel etc. Its been more than 50 years. $$ is no object. Lots of 5000.00 dollar rifles with 4000.00 thermal scopes. Pressure equals velocity and brass cases can't handle any more pressure.
|
|
|
Re: why substandard ballistics
[Re: Killbuck]
#8450585
08/07/25 09:06 PM
08/07/25 09:06 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Providence Farm
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
|
I'm talking about new technology, not just stuffing more powder in a case. Same old brass case, barrel steel etc. Its been more than 50 years. $$ is no object. Lots of 5000.00 dollar rifles with 4000.00 thermal scopes. Portable power supply and batteries are limited for man portable lazers as far as I have seen. But it's not science I follow closely. A light saber sounds fun untill you remember how often you cut yourself with your pocket knife.
|
|
|
|
|
|