No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
why substandard ballistics #8450491
Yesterday at 07:02 PM
Yesterday at 07:02 PM
Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
K
Killbuck Offline OP
trapper
Killbuck  Offline OP
trapper
K

Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
Everything in the world with the exception of firearms have progressed at an exponential rate. No company has bested the 220 Swift, 300 Weatherby, 264 WM etc. for 50+ years. The only thing that has change is the bullet ogive. Velocity is no better! Oh and they cut a couple inches off the tube. P.O.Ackley is spinning inn his grave. We should have velocities 5000fps by now.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450498
Yesterday at 07:16 PM
Yesterday at 07:16 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Been saying that for a long time. Not 5000fps but nothing new in spite of advertising by gun writers on each new wonderful development. Have to reinvent the wheel to keep selling. Scopes are seriously improved.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450510
Yesterday at 07:40 PM
Yesterday at 07:40 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
Material science is still bound to the metallurgy of barrels and actions when dealing with pressure propulsion of projectiles.

The Army's new 6.8 had to fundamentally change the cartridge case in order to hold higer pressures.


[Linked Image]
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450512
Yesterday at 07:42 PM
Yesterday at 07:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
SNIPERBBB Offline
trapper
SNIPERBBB  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Rodney,Ohio
You can probably build a gun that doesn't leave the bench to shoot 5000+. You wouldn't want to carry it out to the field and hunt with it

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450516
Yesterday at 07:47 PM
Yesterday at 07:47 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
If they get the 7 backcountry mastered that will open the door to higher velocities with longer barrels but no bullets will be up to par. And barrel life might suffer. Right now accuracy is main game and I'm not sure there's a real need for higher velocities. What would be the gain in extreme velocities?
With range finders and ballistic apps flat shooting isn't as important as it once was.

Last edited by Yes sir; Yesterday at 07:49 PM.
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Yes sir] #8450518
Yesterday at 07:48 PM
Yesterday at 07:48 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Blackduck Minnesota
B
Big Sam Offline
trapper
Big Sam  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2012
Blackduck Minnesota
Originally Posted by Yes sir
If they get the 7 backcountry mastered that will open the door to higher velocities with longer barrels but no bullets will be up to par. And barrel life might suffer. Right now accuracy is main game and I'm not sure there's a real need for higher velocities. What would be the gain in extreme velocities?

Folks want to kill stuff a mile away with a flatter trajectory.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Big Sam] #8450523
Yesterday at 07:52 PM
Yesterday at 07:52 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Big Sam
Originally Posted by Yes sir
If they get the 7 backcountry mastered that will open the door to higher velocities with longer barrels but no bullets will be up to par. And barrel life might suffer. Right now accuracy is main game and I'm not sure there's a real need for higher velocities. What would be the gain in extreme velocities?

Folks want to kill stuff a mile away with a flatter trajectory.

With range finders and ballistic apps a flat trajectory isn't that important for extreme distance hit. The creedmoor is a slow cartridge but pretty accurate at longer ranges, ranges further that most people can make ethical shots on game. A thousand more feet per second is going to gain very range forgiveness at 4 figure distances.

Last edited by Yes sir; Yesterday at 07:55 PM.
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450528
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Yesterday at 07:56 PM
Joined: Aug 2012
Blackduck Minnesota
B
Big Sam Offline
trapper
Big Sam  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Aug 2012
Blackduck Minnesota
Well Yes sir, you and I both understand that, but we also both know that as soon as they start writing up how flat it shoots and how far it kills, money will start changing hands real quick.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Big Sam] #8450530
Yesterday at 07:58 PM
Yesterday at 07:58 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Big Sam
Well Yes sir, you and I both understand that, but we also both know that as soon as they start writing up how flat it shoots and how far it kills, money will start changing hands real quick.

Lol true words. People were jumping on the 7 BC before it was really proven if it works

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450539
Yesterday at 08:14 PM
Yesterday at 08:14 PM
Joined: Sep 2010
NE
M
Marty B Offline
"arbitrary noob"
Marty B  Offline
"arbitrary noob"
M

Joined: Sep 2010
NE
Originally Posted by Killbuck
Everything in the world with the exception of firearms have progressed at an exponential rate. No company has bested the 220 Swift, 300 Weatherby, 264 WM etc. for 50+ years. The only thing that has change is the bullet ogive. Velocity is no better! Oh and they cut a couple inches off the tube. P.O.Ackley is spinning inn his grave. We should have velocities 5000fps by now.




Its called a price point.


People dont want to pay what it would cost.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450545
Yesterday at 08:24 PM
Yesterday at 08:24 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
Get you a 30"+ barrel and you'll have speed.

Not fun to carry tho!


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450549
Yesterday at 08:33 PM
Yesterday at 08:33 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91 Offline
trapper
Wolfdog91  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Boy this is getting good.
All I know the new stuff I've messed with is generally easier to deal with across the board vs a lot of legacy cartridges.....

But in the grand scheme of things when 60% of people are either nah dumping into berms or boiler rooming a deer at least the 100yd .... Does a lot of it really even matter ?


YouTube expert
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Wolfdog91] #8450552
Yesterday at 08:36 PM
Yesterday at 08:36 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Wolfdog91
Boy this is getting good.
All I know the new stuff I've messed with is generally easier to deal with across the board vs a lot of legacy cartridges.....

But in the grand scheme of things when 60% of people are either nah dumping into berms or boiler rooming a deer at least the 100yd .... Does a lot of it really even matter ?

What's getting good?

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Yes sir] #8450554
Yesterday at 08:39 PM
Yesterday at 08:39 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91 Offline
trapper
Wolfdog91  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Originally Posted by Yes sir
Originally Posted by Wolfdog91
Boy this is getting good.
All I know the new stuff I've messed with is generally easier to deal with across the board vs a lot of legacy cartridges.....

But in the grand scheme of things when 60% of people are either nah dumping into berms or boiler rooming a deer at least the 100yd .... Does a lot of it really even matter ?

What's getting good?

The thread ? What a guy can't enjoy a post talking about old stuff being better then new stuff


YouTube expert
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450561
Yesterday at 08:45 PM
Yesterday at 08:45 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
I must have missed it. I thought we were talking about extreme velocities. But if ur enjoying it all is good

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450572
Yesterday at 08:59 PM
Yesterday at 08:59 PM
Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
K
Killbuck Offline OP
trapper
Killbuck  Offline OP
trapper
K

Joined: May 2013
Holmes Co. Ohio
I'm talking about new technology, not just stuffing more powder in a case. Same old brass case, barrel steel etc. Its been more than 50 years. $$ is no object. Lots of 5000.00 dollar rifles with 4000.00 thermal scopes.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450573
Yesterday at 09:00 PM
Yesterday at 09:00 PM
Joined: Dec 2012
Northern WI
L
Line Jumper Offline
trapper
Line Jumper  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2012
Northern WI
Probably because calibers like the 220 swift and 264 win mag got the reputation of barrel burners. Faster isn’t always better

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: warrior] #8450581
Yesterday at 09:04 PM
Yesterday at 09:04 PM
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Scott__aR Online content
trapper
Scott__aR  Online Content
trapper

Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Originally Posted by warrior
Material science is still bound to the metallurgy of barrels and actions when dealing with pressure propulsion of projectiles.

The Army's new 6.8 had to fundamentally change the cartridge case in order to hold higer pressures.



^^^ this^^^ At much over 4000fps barrels start burning the throat.


Megapredator ... top of the food chain!
Member of WTA
Member of U.P. Trappers
Member of NTA
Member of FTA
Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450582
Yesterday at 09:04 PM
Yesterday at 09:04 PM
Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Y
Yes sir Offline
trapper
Yes sir  Offline
trapper
Y

Joined: Jan 2017
Marion Kansas
Originally Posted by Killbuck
I'm talking about new technology, not just stuffing more powder in a case. Same old brass case, barrel steel etc. Its been more than 50 years. $$ is no object. Lots of 5000.00 dollar rifles with 4000.00 thermal scopes.

Pressure equals velocity and brass cases can't handle any more pressure.

Re: why substandard ballistics [Re: Killbuck] #8450585
Yesterday at 09:06 PM
Yesterday at 09:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Originally Posted by Killbuck
I'm talking about new technology, not just stuffing more powder in a case. Same old brass case, barrel steel etc. Its been more than 50 years. $$ is no object. Lots of 5000.00 dollar rifles with 4000.00 thermal scopes.


Portable power supply and batteries are limited for man portable lazers as far as I have seen. But it's not science I follow closely.

A light saber sounds fun untill you remember how often you cut yourself with your pocket knife.

Page 1 of 2 1 2
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread