The German occupation seemed a little different to me.
Yes. Everyone good friends and believed the enemy sits in the East.
It's more about the formalities, specifically, was the occupation of West Germany ever formally ended?
The occupation of East Germany formally ended in 1949 with the founding of the GDR.
In the West, the occupation statute was replaced in 1952 by the Germany Treaty between the FRG and the three Western Allied powers, which, however, only partially lifted the occupation status.
Many say that the occupation finally ended in 1991 with the entry into force of the Two Plus Four Treaty, signed in 1990.
But even the Two Plus Four Treaty contains no formal provision for ending the occupation. Only in the preamble, which is not part of the treaty's articles, is the following wording found:
"Recognizing that thereby, and with the unification of Germany as a democratic and peaceful
state, the rights and responsibilities of the Four Powers relating to Berlin and to Germany as a
whole lose their function;"
But does "lose their function" really mean that they no longer exist? Or does it perhaps mean that they can continue to exist and regain their importance?
If one has to spin long legal threads to interpret a contract, then in my view it is not unambiguous.
Furthermore, in my view, Germany has clearly violated Article 2 of the Two Plus Four Treaty by participating in the war against Serbia, which was illegal under international law. It is therefore questionable whether the treaty is still valid at all.