No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
Why do we call the American Tulip Tree a Tulip Poplar or Yellow Poplar? When in fact it is more closely related to the Magnolias and not at all to the true Populus poplars.
That's the tulip part but what about the poplar part when it's not really a poplar.
An aspen is a type of poplar.
Keith
That it is. But at a distance they look similar to tulip, tall light colored stem with yellow/gold fall color. My working theory is why tulip got poplar hung on it.
I don’t know about your area, but around here, they develop flowers in the spring that resemble tulips. I figured that’s why they were called tulip poplars.
Tulip poplars do well on my end of the state, but don't grow here without being planted. In South East, Ohio, tulip poplars grow in the wild. Twenty some years ago, I planted some at my mom's house, that are spectacular now. A friend of mine has some that he planted too. I love how straight tulip poplars are. I have a 16' stickered bunk of tulip poplar and beech in my barn, that I should do something with, that's dried in there since 2012. It's 9/4 to 10/4 thick.
I don’t know about your area, but around here, they develop flowers in the spring that resemble tulips. I figured that’s why they were called tulip poplars.
There's an old boy over here that calls them cottonwoods. Clear as mud.
I may be seeing the same species in drastically different growing conditions.
A Penn St guy comes around twice a year. I've "unlearned" a lot from him.
First snow right now.
confusion around common names is why foresters use scientific names when talking among themselves.
I think you're right about different growing conditions...makes sense to me.
Eastern Cottonwod is our only native poplar down south and it is never called poplar. Matter of fact many have no idea that cottonwood is a poplar unless they've done some basic botany.
Les, A friend said yes but he called it popple. And pretty sure he doesn't know scientific name of beaver. His drywall mudding (sheet rock finishing) skills are coming along nicely tho.
Lots of trees were given common names reflecting their similarity in usage compared to other better known trees. That was all they cared about. liriodendron is Latin for 'lily tree' while tulipifera is Latin for 'tulip-bearing'. Therefor it should be called the Tulip-bearing Lily Tree, which of course, makes everyone except myself wrong, which happens to be my sole purpose in life as I reach full maturity. On the plus side, it has been said that I am quiet once you get to know me.
That is why trees have "scientific (Latin) names!" And thanks to dendrologists with time on their hands and a sense of humor, tulip popular is one of my favorites!
They are pretty. Indiana plants the crap out of them.
I like knowing they were the tree the Indians liked for canoes.
I have built a bunch of dugouts with them. One thing I learned that completely unexpected is that the wood appears to either never waterlog, or it takes a VERY long time. One that I built in 2012 has been stored underwater, only floating it once every few years for a paddle around the lake or some fish spearing. To raise it from the bottom, I just start taking the big rocks out and usually when there are 3 or 4 left, it starts to slowly come up. When the gunwales break the surface, I bail it out. I would have never guessed that it would not waterlog in over a decade. Most of the wood is less than 2 inches thick, but the prows have a little more mass, maybe 4” thick. Here is a picture of the one I built in 2012 being paddled by a buddy a couple years ago. It is stable enough that a person can stand on one gunnel without capsizing. Its big, heavy, and slow, but basically indestructible and definitely unsinkable unless weighted down.
They are pretty. Indiana plants the crap out of them.
I like knowing they were the tree the Indians liked for canoes.
I have built a bunch of dugouts with them. One thing I learned that completely unexpected is that the wood appears to either never waterlog, or it takes a VERY long time. One that I built in 2012 has been stored underwater, only floating it once every few years for a paddle around the lake or some fish spearing. To raise it from the bottom, I just start taking the big rocks out and usually when there are 3 or 4 left, it starts to slowly come up. When the gunwales break the surface, I bail it out. I would have never guessed that it would not waterlog in over a decade. Most of the wood is less than 2 inches thick, but the prows have a little more mass, maybe 4” thick. Here is a picture of the one I built in 2012 being paddled by a buddy a couple years ago. It is stable enough that a person can stand on one gunnel without capsizing. Its big, heavy, and slow, but basically indestructible and definitely unsinkable unless weighted down.
That's really cool. Do you make the dugouts in a traditional way or with modern tools?
How long does it take to make a dugout?
What's the advantage to keeping the dugouts underwater for storage?
The reason they are stored underwater is because they do not crack. If you allow them to dry they will crack and split and require a lot of pitch or sealant of some kind to be watertight.
I have made them with both modern and stone tools. One of them the tree was felled by burning, which took about 14 hours, then it was hollowed out by a combination of chopping with stone axes and burning which took several days. It goes faster than you might expect, because we started by using antler wedges and wood glits to split the top and bottom off leaving about a 14” “center beam” which is then hollowed out. We actually found that the most efficient method was to mostly chop it with stone axes, then do a few burns to finish and smooth it. And ethnographic accounts worldwide support that most of them were chopped not burned to hollow. In fact the early North American accounts of burning are all third hand and a little suspect in accuracy. Let me see if I can find the YouTube video of fire felling that one… Another thing I learned - if the tree is under about 12 or 14 inches diameter, it is faster and easier to chop it down with a stone axe, but any bigger and the effort involved favors burning the tree down. Chopping a 30” tree with a stone axe takes around 40 hours, but you can burn one down in about 15 hours. But under about 12”, the stone axe will have it down before you really even get the fire going enough to do anything.
Les, A friend said yes but he called it popple. And pretty sure he doesn't know scientific name of beaver. His drywall mudding (sheet rock finishing) skills are coming along nicely tho.
My skills are improving too,lol, seems I’m getting older and there’s more to it than I ever thought…
"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
I have no idea what a tulip poplar or tulip tree is, but here's an even more confusing one.
The Douglas fir is one of the most common and widespread conifers in the western USA, and the most significant timber producing tree in the Pacific Northwest. However, it is not a fir tree, it is actually a type of spruce. But what is most confusing is it's scientific name, Pseudo-tsuga Meenziesii: Pseudo-tsuga means "false hemlock".
The Douglas fir is one of the most common and widespread conifers in the western USA, and the most significant timber producing tree in the Pacific Northwest. However, it is not a fir tree, it is actually a type of spruce. But what is most confusing is it's scientific name, Pseudo-tsuga Meenziesii: Pseudo-tsuga means "false hemlock".
I'll see your Pseudo-tsuga Menziestii and raise you a Robinia pseudoacacia....
^^^^ "Hem Fir"; hemlock and any other true fir (silver, white, grand, noble, etc). But unknown to most people none of the superior Doug fir makes it into the hem-fir sort.
"My life is better than your vacation"
Re: You ever wonder, Tulip POPLAR
[Re: warrior]
#8502113 11/12/2506:10 AM11/12/2506:10 AM
In framing lumber grading Doug Fir is in it's own category (D Fir) or sometimes included with Larch (D-Fir-L). The medium strength firs are grouped together (Hem-Fir or H-F) and the weaker spruces, pines and firs are in their own group (S-P-F). Southern Yellow Pine is usually in it's own category (SYP) and is mostly used in treated lumber and plywood.
There have only been a few occasions when I've had architects specify Doug Fir. Almost always it was on longer clear spans in residential construction.
The Douglas fir is one of the most common and widespread conifers in the western USA, and the most significant timber producing tree in the Pacific Northwest. However, it is not a fir tree, it is actually a type of spruce. But what is most confusing is it's scientific name, Pseudo-tsuga Meenziesii: Pseudo-tsuga means "false hemlock".
I'll see your Pseudo-tsuga Menziestii and raise you a Robinia pseudoacacia....
Oh yeah? Well how about my alltime Dendrology favorite Dawn Redwood: Metasequoia glyptostroboides!
[quote=warrior]Why do we call the American Tulip Tree a Tulip Poplar or Yellow Poplar? When in fact it is more closely related to the Magnolias and not at all to the true Populus poplars.
No, but I have always wondered why Minnesotans cannot say poplar. It's really not that hard. Must be the Scandinavian in them.
Re: You ever wonder, Tulip POPLAR
[Re: Dean Chapel]
#8502373 11/12/2503:26 PM11/12/2503:26 PM
[quote=warrior]Why do we call the American Tulip Tree a Tulip Poplar or Yellow Poplar? When in fact it is more closely related to the Magnolias and not at all to the true Populus poplars.
No, but I have always wondered why Minnesotans cannot say poplar. It's really not that hard. Must be the Scandinavian in them.
Me too. Kind of like "fisher cat", just make is simple (and correct); fisher.
[quote=warrior]Why do we call the American Tulip Tree a Tulip Poplar or Yellow Poplar? When in fact it is more closely related to the Magnolias and not at all to the true Populus poplars.
No, but I have always wondered why Minnesotans cannot say poplar. It's really not that hard. Must be the Scandinavian in them.
its because we naturally want to say popple not because we can’t say poplar….it’s not a speech impediment….
"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."