I want men who went on a fancy vacation to rape little girls to go to jail. But I'm a realist so I know we'll never get the real list.

People love seeing dirt on others. It makes them feel not so bad about the dirt they have on themselves.

This

Of course there's no list. There is, though, a trove of evidence and information that could be used to investigate and prosecute baby rapers, if the DOJ did it's job.


This whole Epstein thing is a pretty easy litmus test to see who cares about politics more than children being raped.

Its all very obvious. The Israelis have been blackmailing the US govt for years, Epstein was just the latest they used. Look at how much aid we give them , for what? They are close to penning a 4 billion dollar a year CASH aid package, called a loan, so as no oversight, with loan forgiveness penciled in. If anyone watched the Jewish prime ministers speech to congress , it would make you sick on how many standing ovations he got and by who, both sides.
The premise that if Trump was implicated, the Dems would have outed him holds water, That being said, Could Trump have planned on using the same "list" to "blackmail" a few votes from dems? And if the files come out he loses leverage?
Anyway with both sides implicated, I am sure there will be a "bipartisan" end to this with 0.00 arrests , except for a few low level collateral damage red herrings, Isreal will still get our money and the uniparty will survive unscathed.

Maybe not like a grocery list on a post it or notebook but there are plenty of files.

With all the high profile sick individuals in high places seems like a beter use is blackmail would be government thinking. Why give up leverage!

Trump was outplayed and forced to give up the files. He does not want any more info coming out. My speculation is that it will show that the US govt. was complicit, in conjunction with Isreal, in Epstein's honey pot scheme. Trump, as well as those in power before him, have been using these files as leverage. It will not look good Trump that he chose to blackmail rather than prosecute.

And Epstein did not hang himself.

ol' dad

my offer to beaverpeeler goes for you too, BC...give me a list of your friends and their addresses, and I'll get back to you on what YOU are gullty of.

you'd think an officer of the Court would understand that an association does not prove guilt...

Weird strawman. Nobody said we should convict anyone for being in a list or file. We want them convicted after being investigated and put on trial.

Quit trying to minimize or blow off child rape.

LOL!

BC and beaverpeeler mentioned the association with Epstein. the same concept would apply to THEIR friends, too.

lg, why don't you ask THEM why they made a point of mentioning the one-time friendship between Trump and Epstein. Why would it matter, if not for "guilt by association"?

Why do people want a "list" produced by the govt they don't trust when the victims could just as easily tell you who raped then?

Besides that, you're going to need them to testify so if they ain't pointing fingers, good luck prosecuting anyone.

That logic doesn’t work people up like the terms baby rapers or child molesters.

You know that two tiered justice system we always hear about? Well this is it.

Simple question......There are accusations of child rape. Should the DOJ investigate those accusations and prosecute where probable cause exists?

Accusations by who?

Your not running for office are you? Seems like your really trying to get some practice in at avoiding questions and trying to reframe them.

There are women who have accused Epstein of trafficking them, obviously that's who, moving on...