No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564518
02/11/26 10:14 PM
02/11/26 10:14 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
And they gave them 30 days to go over millions of documents, get real.

Either you want them or not,

You fell for the shiny object hook line and sinker.


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564526
02/11/26 10:20 PM
02/11/26 10:20 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
If you really, really want to get who raped these victims, give them the microphone.


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564528
02/11/26 10:22 PM
02/11/26 10:22 PM
Joined: Oct 2007
OK
Aaron Proffitt Offline
trapper
Aaron Proffitt  Offline
trapper

Joined: Oct 2007
OK
I feel you guys may be agreeing more than disagreeing. Its just that conversation is making wide right turns.


Honor a Soldier. Be the kind of American worth fighting for.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564529
02/11/26 10:24 PM
02/11/26 10:24 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
W
Wright Brothers Offline
trapper
Wright Brothers  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
Hippie, give them the mic.
Outstanding man.

I'm going to use that thanks.





Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: hippie] #8564537
02/11/26 10:42 PM
02/11/26 10:42 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad Offline OP
trapper
ol' dad  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
Originally Posted by hippie
And they gave them 30 days to go over millions of documents, get real.

Either you want them or not,

You fell for the shiny object hook line and sinker.



Actually what happened is the DOJ violated the deadline with the excuse that it wasn't enough time to go through all the files and redact all the names. So congress gave them extra time despite being in violation of the law. They still dropped the ball. They actually used Adobe PDF to redact some of the names. It took all of about 10 seconds before the public realized they could copy and paste that portion that was redacted into a Microsoft word document and reveal the original text.

Ol dad

Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564538
02/11/26 10:44 PM
02/11/26 10:44 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell Online crying
trapper
Savell  Online Crying
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
… he was part of the oligarchy for a time…. But became no longer useful



Insert profound nonsense here
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564540
02/11/26 10:46 PM
02/11/26 10:46 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
They're using him pretty good yet, lol


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564541
02/11/26 10:48 PM
02/11/26 10:48 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
Originally Posted by ol' dad
Originally Posted by hippie
And they gave them 30 days to go over millions of documents, get real.

Either you want them or not,

You fell for the shiny object hook line and sinker.



Actually what happened is the DOJ violated the deadline with the excuse that it wasn't enough time to go through all the files and redact all the names. So congress gave them extra time despite being in violation of the law. They still dropped the ball. They actually used Adobe PDF to redact some of the names. It took all of about 10 seconds before the public realized they could copy and paste that portion that was redacted into a Microsoft word document and reveal the original text.

Ol dad


Ok, now what?


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: hippie] #8564542
02/11/26 10:48 PM
02/11/26 10:48 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad Offline OP
trapper
ol' dad  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
Originally Posted by hippie
If you really, really want to get who raped these victims, give them the microphone.


That is easier said than done. They're scared to come out against some of these powerful men. I'm sure in fear of life and/or bankruptcy.. and it's evidenced by how things are playing out as we speak. Our legal system is there for this exact reason. And they've been let down by it.

Ol Dad

Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564544
02/11/26 10:52 PM
02/11/26 10:52 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad Offline OP
trapper
ol' dad  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
Quote
[hippie]


Ok, now what?



An apology would be a good start. Then followed by someone competent to follow and enforce the law.

Ol dad
[/quote]

Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564545
02/11/26 10:52 PM
02/11/26 10:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
Sounds like they want something done, but really don't.

Like someone stealing your traps but you won't come forward and press charges.


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: hippie] #8564547
02/11/26 10:55 PM
02/11/26 10:55 PM
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad Offline OP
trapper
ol' dad  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
Originally Posted by hippie
Sounds like they want something done, but really don't.

Like someone stealing your traps but you won't come forward and press charges.


Getting your trap stolen or your virginity taken at 14 by a stranger with a lot of power is not a fair comparison.

I think we are on the same side here. Just watch the dadgum hearing and you'll know where I'm coming from.

Ol dad

Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564549
02/11/26 10:58 PM
02/11/26 10:58 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
There's another part to our law.....The 6th amendment. The right to Face your accuser


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564550
02/11/26 11:00 PM
02/11/26 11:00 PM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
I watched some, it was the usual mud slinging when both sides of the table are to blame.


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564590
02/12/26 03:07 AM
02/12/26 03:07 AM
Joined: Jan 2008
USA MN
Snowpa Offline
trapper
Snowpa  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2008
USA MN
Bondi is my choice best we have had 2nd amendment that always a mess


Never Confuse Stupid With Crazy
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564616
02/12/26 05:59 AM
02/12/26 05:59 AM
Joined: Mar 2010
2A Sanctuaries-W. OK & N. NM
Blaine County Offline
trapper
Blaine County  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2010
2A Sanctuaries-W. OK & N. NM
I watched some more of the hearing this morning drinking coffee. Awful.

These bimbo lawyers who were picked for their looks and fake sass keep going down in flames. They are horrible lawyers and not serious people.

Regarding the 2A, we covered this when Bondi was appointed. She has a bad track record on the 2A. Not to be trusted. Not at all. On anything actually.


Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564640
02/12/26 06:35 AM
02/12/26 06:35 AM
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
H
hippie Offline
trapper
hippie  Offline
trapper
H

Joined: Feb 2010
pa
Now ya know how you sound.


There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564650
02/12/26 07:12 AM
02/12/26 07:12 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
L
Lugnut Online content
trapper
Lugnut  Online Content
trapper
L

Joined: Dec 2006
SEPA
grin


Eh...wot?

Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564656
02/12/26 07:18 AM
02/12/26 07:18 AM
Joined: Jan 2012
Ohio
OhioBoy Offline
trapper
OhioBoy  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2012
Ohio
You guys follow this way more than me but doesn't she openly defend trump? Thats why shes still around right?

Re: We need a better chief legal officer.. [Re: ol' dad] #8564660
02/12/26 07:30 AM
02/12/26 07:30 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Might be she is not a terrible lawyer. Might be she is following script.

End of the NFA, national constitutional carry, aint gonna happen.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Page 2 of 4 1 2 3 4
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread