|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564518
02/11/26 10:14 PM
02/11/26 10:14 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
And they gave them 30 days to go over millions of documents, get real.
Either you want them or not,
You fell for the shiny object hook line and sinker.
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564526
02/11/26 10:20 PM
02/11/26 10:20 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
If you really, really want to get who raped these victims, give them the microphone.
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564528
02/11/26 10:22 PM
02/11/26 10:22 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2007
OK
Aaron Proffitt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2007
OK
|
I feel you guys may be agreeing more than disagreeing. Its just that conversation is making wide right turns.
Honor a Soldier. Be the kind of American worth fighting for.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564529
02/11/26 10:24 PM
02/11/26 10:24 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
Wright Brothers
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Pa
|
Hippie, give them the mic. Outstanding man.
I'm going to use that thanks.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: hippie]
#8564537
02/11/26 10:42 PM
02/11/26 10:42 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
|
And they gave them 30 days to go over millions of documents, get real.
Either you want them or not,
You fell for the shiny object hook line and sinker.
Actually what happened is the DOJ violated the deadline with the excuse that it wasn't enough time to go through all the files and redact all the names. So congress gave them extra time despite being in violation of the law. They still dropped the ball. They actually used Adobe PDF to redact some of the names. It took all of about 10 seconds before the public realized they could copy and paste that portion that was redacted into a Microsoft word document and reveal the original text. Ol dad
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564538
02/11/26 10:44 PM
02/11/26 10:44 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
Savell
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Coldspring Texas
|
… he was part of the oligarchy for a time…. But became no longer useful
Insert profound nonsense here
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564540
02/11/26 10:46 PM
02/11/26 10:46 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
They're using him pretty good yet, lol
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564541
02/11/26 10:48 PM
02/11/26 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
And they gave them 30 days to go over millions of documents, get real.
Either you want them or not,
You fell for the shiny object hook line and sinker.
Actually what happened is the DOJ violated the deadline with the excuse that it wasn't enough time to go through all the files and redact all the names. So congress gave them extra time despite being in violation of the law. They still dropped the ball. They actually used Adobe PDF to redact some of the names. It took all of about 10 seconds before the public realized they could copy and paste that portion that was redacted into a Microsoft word document and reveal the original text. Ol dad Ok, now what?
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: hippie]
#8564542
02/11/26 10:48 PM
02/11/26 10:48 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
|
If you really, really want to get who raped these victims, give them the microphone. That is easier said than done. They're scared to come out against some of these powerful men. I'm sure in fear of life and/or bankruptcy.. and it's evidenced by how things are playing out as we speak. Our legal system is there for this exact reason. And they've been let down by it. Ol Dad
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564544
02/11/26 10:52 PM
02/11/26 10:52 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
|
An apology would be a good start. Then followed by someone competent to follow and enforce the law. Ol dad [/quote]
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564545
02/11/26 10:52 PM
02/11/26 10:52 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
Sounds like they want something done, but really don't.
Like someone stealing your traps but you won't come forward and press charges.
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: hippie]
#8564547
02/11/26 10:55 PM
02/11/26 10:55 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
ol' dad
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Dec 2007
NE Missouri
|
Sounds like they want something done, but really don't.
Like someone stealing your traps but you won't come forward and press charges. Getting your trap stolen or your virginity taken at 14 by a stranger with a lot of power is not a fair comparison. I think we are on the same side here. Just watch the dadgum hearing and you'll know where I'm coming from. Ol dad
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564549
02/11/26 10:58 PM
02/11/26 10:58 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
There's another part to our law.....The 6th amendment. The right to Face your accuser
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564550
02/11/26 11:00 PM
02/11/26 11:00 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
I watched some, it was the usual mud slinging when both sides of the table are to blame.
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564590
02/12/26 03:07 AM
02/12/26 03:07 AM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
USA MN
Snowpa
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2008
USA MN
|
Bondi is my choice best we have had 2nd amendment that always a mess
Never Confuse Stupid With Crazy
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564640
02/12/26 06:35 AM
02/12/26 06:35 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
Now ya know how you sound.
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: We need a better chief legal officer..
[Re: ol' dad]
#8564660
02/12/26 07:30 AM
02/12/26 07:30 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
danny clifton
"Grumpy Old Man"
|
"Grumpy Old Man"
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
|
Might be she is not a terrible lawyer. Might be she is following script.
End of the NFA, national constitutional carry, aint gonna happen.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|