No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: Glock or 1911? [Re: 160user] #8577549
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior Offline
trapper
warrior  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
A 1911 made to proper specs will run all day long. The original contract specifications for the 1911A1 in WWII called for taking two examples from each contract manufacturer detail stripping all of them to the basic parts them putting everything in drum and giving a roll to mix them all up. Then pull random parts for reassembly into pistols for function testing and firing.

Where 1911 got the bad rap was post war bullseye accurizing that tightened things to minimum spec tolerances. Folks forgot what the 1911 was designed to be. It was never meant to be a target pistol. It was and is a combat arm meant to function under all conditions with the ability to detail strip and replace parts in the field without armorers tools.


[Linked Image]
Re: Glock or 1911? [Re: 160user] #8577551
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
Joined: Jan 2014
North East Kansas
Marty Offline
trapper
Marty  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2014
North East Kansas
Simple, both.
1911 in vehicle and glockenspiel in holster.


Rise and Rise Again
Until Lambs Become Lions
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread