|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: foxkidd44]
#8583559
9 hours ago
9 hours ago
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
I’m changing it up all the time, but usually trigger up front due to my vid a few weeks ago about the trigger wires splitting and catching the jaw. If there’s skunk around like this one I’ll have em about 2.5” apart but sometimes I’ll spread em a lot more……….or less depending on the box and trap. The deep narrow box with the 120 has the trigger way off to the side. Not too many sets are consistent for me, they all change with the terrain and the gear I got in my hand. IIRC, this one was 2.5-3” apart and it’s a full suitcase. ![[Linked Image]](https://trapperman.com/forum/attachments/usergals/2026/03/full-56418-288456-img_3189.jpeg)
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: foxkidd44]
#8583566
9 hours ago
9 hours ago
|
Joined: Mar 2011
williams,mn
trapper les
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2011
williams,mn
|
Guys,,, I personally like 160s because I feel that 160s kill a coon faster.. just my opinion. And I really like them. But this past season I really got to thinking,,, am I getting more refusals than I realize because of the smaller size compared to the 220?? I know some guys who use the 5x5 for raccoon in boxes because of limited regulations , do kill raccoon,, but they do get more refusals.
Any of you guys with cameras ever catch this on your camera???
160 at the entrance of the box,pan facing out…
"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: foxkidd44]
#8583584
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Missouri
HayDay
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2018
Missouri
|
When I started doing my own ADC work, I started with buckets......set in front of game cameras. Won't share the details here, but suffice to say my first catch was less than impressive. Coon was found dead......but. So that spawned a research project to do better......and that included setting various traps in various boxes......(including one with plexi-glass side to watch the trap fire) and all of them in front of game cameras to watch them work the traps. I should also mention I trap in an area populated by barn cats and possible neighbor's pets, so follow letter and spirit of our trapping rules to avoid any chance of incidentals.
So what I found was vast majority of coon will first setup shop in front of horizontal box or bucket and reach in. Few, if any, just poke their head in and go.They only go in as last resort. But take same box and move it to vertical........bait shelf up top.......and once trained to go in, will race each other to see who gets caught first. If opening in the bottom is blocked down to 3 to 4 inches, they still go in, but have to slither under the opening, they arch their back and push up with front paws, pushing forward with back feet. They lead with the forehead and fire the trap pushing up with forehead and that leads to a near perfect neck strike every time. Again, same wood box as others, just set vertical. Tied or lashed to a post, wall.......or could be fence post or tree. That also eliminates nearly all incidentals.
Most 160's are simply scaled up 5 x 5 or even 120's.....same wire. Belisle and Bridger are made of sterner stuff.........220's scaled down in size. Belisle 160 is an absolute hammer. Bridger 160 is also, but triggers suck pond water........have to be replaced to make work. So bottom line........Belisle 160 or a 220 in a vertical box is what I have now. They will pound the coon.
Easy to vote your way into socialism, but impossible to vote your way out of it.
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: HayDay]
#8583597
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
|
Joined: Nov 2018
Ontario
Saskfly
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2018
Ontario
|
When I started doing my own ADC work, I started with buckets......set in front of game cameras. Won't share the details here, but suffice to say my first catch was less than impressive. Coon was found dead......but. So that spawned a research project to do better......and that included setting various traps in various boxes......(including one with plexi-glass side to watch the trap fire) and all of them in front of game cameras to watch them work the traps. I should also mention I trap in an area populated by barn cats and possible neighbor's pets, so follow letter and spirit of our trapping rules to avoid any chance of incidentals.
So what I found was vast majority of coon will first setup shop in front of horizontal box or bucket and reach in. Few, if any, just poke their head in and go.They only go in as last resort. But take same box and move it to vertical........bait shelf up top.......and once trained to go in, will race each other to see who gets caught first. If opening in the bottom is blocked down to 3 to 4 inches, they still go in, but have to slither under the opening, they arch their back and push up with front paws, pushing forward with back feet. They lead with the forehead and fire the trap pushing up with forehead and that leads to a near perfect neck strike every time. Again, same wood box as others, just set vertical. Tied or lashed to a post, wall.......or could be fence post or tree. That also eliminates nearly all incidentals.
Most 160's are simply scaled up 5 x 5 or even 120's.....same wire. Belisle and Bridger are made of sterner stuff.........220's scaled down in size. Belisle 160 is an absolute hammer. Bridger 160 is also, but triggers suck pond water........have to be replaced to make work. So bottom line........Belisle 160 or a 220 in a vertical box is what I have now. They will pound the coon. This makes sense to me and thanks for taking the time to post it.
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: MChewk]
#8583600
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Illinois
foxkidd44
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jun 2007
Illinois
|
I like the 160 magnum traps in my boxes...tight closure helps a lot. John have you caught any fox or coyotes in your boxes yet? I know the Minnesota guys catch bobcats in their boxes. I use to catch greys in them before they disappeared,,, I have not caught a red in them
Stand by your principles, Stand by your guns, and victory complete and permanent is sure at last. Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: HayDay]
#8583602
8 hours ago
8 hours ago
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Illinois
foxkidd44
OP
trapper
|
OP
trapper
Joined: Jun 2007
Illinois
|
When I started doing my own ADC work, I started with buckets......set in front of game cameras. Won't share the details here, but suffice to say my first catch was less than impressive. Coon was found dead......but. So that spawned a research project to do better......and that included setting various traps in various boxes......(including one with plexi-glass side to watch the trap fire) and all of them in front of game cameras to watch them work the traps. I should also mention I trap in an area populated by barn cats and possible neighbor's pets, so follow letter and spirit of our trapping rules to avoid any chance of incidentals.
So what I found was vast majority of coon will first setup shop in front of horizontal box or bucket and reach in. Few, if any, just poke their head in and go.They only go in as last resort. But take same box and move it to vertical........bait shelf up top.......and once trained to go in, will race each other to see who gets caught first. If opening in the bottom is blocked down to 3 to 4 inches, they still go in, but have to slither under the opening, they arch their back and push up with front paws, pushing forward with back feet. They lead with the forehead and fire the trap pushing up with forehead and that leads to a near perfect neck strike every time. Again, same wood box as others, just set vertical. Tied or lashed to a post, wall.......or could be fence post or tree. That also eliminates nearly all incidentals.
Most 160's are simply scaled up 5 x 5 or even 120's.....same wire. Belisle and Bridger are made of sterner stuff.........220's scaled down in size. Belisle 160 is an absolute hammer. Bridger 160 is also, but triggers suck pond water........have to be replaced to make work. So bottom line........Belisle 160 or a 220 in a vertical box is what I have now. They will pound the coon. Some extremely interesting information!!! Ty!!!
Stand by your principles, Stand by your guns, and victory complete and permanent is sure at last. Abraham Lincoln
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: foxkidd44]
#8583652
7 hours ago
7 hours ago
|
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Trapper7
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
|
I used to get more reach ins with a 160 than a 220. But, if you're using Belisle 160s they will hold them quite often by the foot was my experience.
When you're 20 and drop something you pick it up. When you're 80 you decide you don't need it anymore.
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: foxkidd44]
#8583669
6 hours ago
6 hours ago
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Missouri
HayDay
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2018
Missouri
|
If you are catching them by a foot, that would be consistent with what I saw on game cameras. They almost always will reach as far in as possible and only go in as last resort. How they managed to do that as often as they did without firing trap was big surprise to me.
So if going to go route of horizontal box, make it deep enough reaching in is not an option. And cut slots deep enough to not put trap springs all the way back, so when trap fires, it fires in place and is not propelled out of the box.
Easy to vote your way into socialism, but impossible to vote your way out of it.
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: HayDay]
#8583678
6 hours ago
6 hours ago
|
Joined: Nov 2013
northern indiana
son-of-grizz
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Nov 2013
northern indiana
|
When I started doing my own ADC work, I started with buckets......set in front of game cameras. Won't share the details here, but suffice to say my first catch was less than impressive. Coon was found dead......but. So that spawned a research project to do better......and that included setting various traps in various boxes......(including one with plexi-glass side to watch the trap fire) and all of them in front of game cameras to watch them work the traps. I should also mention I trap in an area populated by barn cats and possible neighbor's pets, so follow letter and spirit of our trapping rules to avoid any chance of incidentals.
So what I found was vast majority of coon will first setup shop in front of horizontal box or bucket and reach in. Few, if any, just poke their head in and go.They only go in as last resort. But take same box and move it to vertical........bait shelf up top.......and once trained to go in, will race each other to see who gets caught first. If opening in the bottom is blocked down to 3 to 4 inches, they still go in, but have to slither under the opening, they arch their back and push up with front paws, pushing forward with back feet. They lead with the forehead and fire the trap pushing up with forehead and that leads to a near perfect neck strike every time. Again, same wood box as others, just set vertical. Tied or lashed to a post, wall.......or could be fence post or tree. That also eliminates nearly all incidentals.
Most 160's are simply scaled up 5 x 5 or even 120's.....same wire. Belisle and Bridger are made of sterner stuff.........220's scaled down in size. Belisle 160 is an absolute hammer. Bridger 160 is also, but triggers suck pond water........have to be replaced to make work. So bottom line........Belisle 160 or a 220 in a vertical box is what I have now. They will pound the coon. How high off the ground were they from the ground?
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: foxkidd44]
#8583690
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Missouri
HayDay
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Mar 2018
Missouri
|
In MO, anything set dry and larger than 5 x 5 is supposed to be 6 feet off the ground, inside a building. Mine were inside fully enclosed barn, with entrance blocked off so only climbing animals can get in........then boxes 3 feet above ground........with shelf / stage below them to block off the bottom. These were all inside my barn. If set in a barn loft, could set right off the deck......no shelf. Goal is forcing them to slither under which ties up all feet and paws......forced to enter box with their forehead leading. Triggers centered in narrow V pattern.
BTW forgot to mention, on game cameras when coon did go in horizontal boxes, almost 100% of the time, when going thru the trap, they would have one front paw on ground supporting weight..... the other was off the ground and leading going thru.......usually an inch or two in front of their nose when trap fired. Stepping over the jaws as they were going thru. In some cases, was really surprised to see how far a coon could get past triggers before they fired. Especially if using 4 way triggers offset well off to one side. Off center just enough to pick a side seemed to work best.
Last edited by HayDay; 5 hours ago.
Easy to vote your way into socialism, but impossible to vote your way out of it.
|
|
|
Re: 160 vs 220 for raccoon in boxes?
[Re: blackhammer]
#8583693
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
|
Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
~ADC~
The Count
|
The Count
Joined: Jun 2010
Iowa
|
You will catch more coon with fewer refusals imo in 220s. You can catch some big coon in 160s but you put a 160 inside a 220 and look at the difference . I think your refusal percentage would be higher and some of it would be determined by time of year and how hungry that coon is with boxes or pails. In trails the 220 rules with no exceptions. X2
|
|
|
|
|