Re: Pellet Rifle
[Re: Rusty Axe Camp]
#8595699
Yesterday at 04:58 PM
Yesterday at 04:58 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2024
Wisconsin
CoyoteCowboy
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2024
Wisconsin
|
Bejamin prowler. My dad won one years back and we put a Gamo scope on it for like 50 bucks and that thing was pretty accurate, like 15 yard sparrow-headshot accurate. It loved the Gamo red fire pellets and I could take out squirrels and rabbits with it quite easily. Not sure about the .22 version but it would probably be good. Lately it has been inaccurate with the red fire pellets; I haven't figured out why... Maybe gamo changed them up a bit or something. I think the gun goes for like 150 or so
North to the Future!
|
|
|
Re: Pellet Rifle
[Re: Rusty Axe Camp]
#8595701
Yesterday at 05:09 PM
Yesterday at 05:09 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
ND
MJM
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
ND
|
I would get a compressed gas gun over a springer. A Nitro Piston. Most break barrels are springers. When you (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman) the barrel you are compressing a spring. With a compressed gas gun you are compressing gas. They both push a piston that forces air out of a chamber and down the barrel. With springers you get back and forward recoil. Due to the spring extending out and then returning to the relaxed position. There is a lot of gun jump with the spring releasing. Staying under $200 may be hard to due unless you think a Red Ryder or something equal would do. I would also go 22 cal not 177. I shot a Gamo whisper and it was not what I would call accurate. I think there was too much velocity for the pellet to stabilize. I never did feel it was sighted in because pellets flew everywhere. I have heard there is no costumer service with Hatsan. That was from reading reviews, I have never tried to contact them my self. I have a Benjamin Predator Nitro Piston in 22 cal and I head shoot gophers out to 50 yards pretty regular. It is no longer made. But they have another model that is a gas piston. Go on Air Gun Depot and you can do a search by all sorts of things. It will give you an idea of what is available.
"Not Really, Not Really" Mark J Monti "MJM you're a jerk."
|
|
|
Re: Pellet Rifle
[Re: gcs]
#8595770
Yesterday at 07:40 PM
Yesterday at 07:40 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
warrior
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2007
Georgia
|
Same question I asked a year ago....I ended up with a Hatsun after hearing good reviews....that thing is extremely hard to (This word is unacceptable on Trapperman), and is heavy as , well, its real heavy... it was so bad on my shoulder, and difficult to handle, I never even got it sighted in...
I should have just got a plain jane pump up...light, easy to pump, and more than accurate for close in work... Springers are just a hard to deal with pia all the way around to me. You cant even hold them the same as others and get the same results.
|
|
|
Re: Pellet Rifle
[Re: midlander]
#8595789
Yesterday at 08:01 PM
Yesterday at 08:01 PM
|
Joined: Oct 2011
Idaho
bearcat2
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Oct 2011
Idaho
|
I have an older Beeman break action. Fairly heavy unit, but is very accurate. It is a 177...if I jad to do it over, I would do 20 cal or mayne 22 cal. It is bad medicine for chipmunk size critters, but you need a very well placed shot on a fox or grey squirrel with the 177. I would also look at RWS Diana air guns for your price range. I bought a Beeman Kodiak 25 caliber about 25 years ago. That was when they were first coming out with gas piston break barrels and there weren't hardly any on the market. I opted for the springer, and it is a good gun. Springers are super hard on scopes due to their reverse recoil, you either need an airgun scope designed for it (these can be had fairly cheap) or a high end rifle scope, I've heard that most Leupold's hold up well, but I've never tried one. Went through a couple airgun scopes, even though they are designed for the recoil, my gun was at the top end of springer power and was still pretty rough on them. I bought a "blemish" and never did find the "cosmetic flaw" in it, (it has plenty now, but none I could find new). Heavy gun, with nice walnut stock, looks and feels like a quality centerfire rifle rather than a cheap airgun. Hunting accurate, not a tack driver, but dime sized groups at 25 yards. And it hits hard, that rifle has killed a lot of bobcats back when I used to pack it. I'll second the RWS rifles also. I'm completely out of date on air guns, but back when I got mine I was looking hard at a couple RWS guns, and they came highly recommended, but so did the Beeman, and while it was usually more, I got a good deal on it and chose it for the 25 caliber. I shoot (shot, I guess, it never gets used any more, although I did take it out and make sure it was sighted in last year and shot a couple dozen rounds through it at a target) 37 grain pellets, and it is very comparable to shooting subsonic 22 long rifle ammo, ballistically.
|
|
|
|
|