No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Re: Bad For The Boundary Waters? [Re: white17] #8600529
3 hours ago
3 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
Sugar Grove, WV
J
JTfromWV Online content
trapper
JTfromWV  Online Content
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2006
Sugar Grove, WV
Originally Posted by white17
Babbitt would have no bearing on this subject cry

This is some of your best work.

Re: Bad For The Boundary Waters? [Re: JTfromWV] #8600530
3 hours ago
3 hours ago
Joined: Mar 2007
McGrath, AK
W
white17 Online content

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
white17  Online Content

"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
W

Joined: Mar 2007
McGrath, AK
Originally Posted by JTfromWV
Originally Posted by white17
Babbitt would have no bearing on this subject cry

This is some of your best work.



Not a very high standard at that !


Mean As Nails
Re: Bad For The Boundary Waters? [Re: WhiteCliffs] #8600531
3 hours ago
3 hours ago
Joined: Mar 2013
Fall Creek, WI
T
TraderVic Online content
trapper
TraderVic  Online Content
trapper
T

Joined: Mar 2013
Fall Creek, WI
Many Federal Regulations enacted at the national level are carried out in each state by the responsible agency ; some examples are ; your respective state DOT carries out federal DOT highway requirements for roads, bridges, etc., construction and maintenance ; the federal DE (Dept of Education) enacts education requirements and your respective state DE sees that they're applied in your public schools, etc, etc.
The EPA, as well as Congress, develop policies, guidelines and requirements for many environmental areas, Clean Water, Clean Air.....are two examples.
Here in WI, the federal (and state) policies are typically instituted by WDNR amd DATCP (Dept of Ag, Trade and Consumer Protection) and primarily enforced by WIDNR (because DNR has legislative authority and DATCP typically does not.
In Minnesota, the state enforcement agency for soil & water, air, etc is MPCA (MN Pollution Control Agency).

Ok, so there is oversight, however there's several things that influence how well (or not) our natural resources are managed and protected ; politics and consistent funding, as you all know, both can and do change intermittently.

Anyway.......it's not as easy and straight up as one might think. I worked 32 years as a Soil and Water Conservationist for USDA. I started with SCS (Soil Conservation Service, now known as NRCS [Natural Resources Conservation Service]) in 1979. I have a pretty good idea how the Feds (and some state agencies) work, and so I always have concerns....

Regards, Vic





Last edited by TraderVic; 3 hours ago.
Re: Bad For The Boundary Waters? [Re: WhiteCliffs] #8600564
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Joined: Dec 2009
The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane Offline
"HOSS"
Leftlane  Offline
"HOSS"

Joined: Dec 2009
The Hill Country of Texas
So your concern is that the same guberment that keeps Samolis from cheating the system would be saving you from unscrupulous mining companies? Ok maybe some concern would be warranted.


What"s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.
Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers


Page 6 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread