No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum ~ Live Chat

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627338
Yesterday at 12:00 PM
Yesterday at 12:00 PM
Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Wolfdog91 Offline
trapper
Wolfdog91  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jul 2013
Amite county Mississippi
Weed ...baaaaddd
Alcohol ....goooooddd

Is what I feel a lot of these convos are gonna feel like lol


YouTube expert
"The bird of Hermes is my name , eating my wings to keep me tame"
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627341
Yesterday at 12:03 PM
Yesterday at 12:03 PM
Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
yotetrapper30 Offline OP
trapper
yotetrapper30  Offline OP
trapper

Joined: May 2011
Oakland, MS
I don't think neither are good. But I don't think neither should prevent you from owning a gun, either.


Proud Leader of Moosetrot's Squad
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627343
Yesterday at 12:06 PM
Yesterday at 12:06 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Originally Posted by yotetrapper30
I don't think neither are good. But I don't think neither should prevent you from owning a gun, either.


After seing what editables did for mom when she was on chemo and radiation I can say weed can be good. Can't say I have ever seen any advantage to alcohol and I have seen way more of that. Maybe increasing birth rates could be seen as positive. So will give it that.

Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627388
Yesterday at 02:13 PM
Yesterday at 02:13 PM
Joined: Mar 2014
SE Iowa USA
A
AKAjust Offline
trapper
AKAjust  Offline
trapper
A

Joined: Mar 2014
SE Iowa USA
I think it should be dependent on the felony.
just

Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627405
Yesterday at 03:32 PM
Yesterday at 03:32 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
Originally Posted by yotetrapper30
I don't think neither are good. But I don't think neither should prevent you from owning a gun, either.


I don't think possession of either should preclude you from your 2A rights.

I think there should be punishments for being impaired while carrying a firearm just the same as driving impaired. The impaired persons judgement and reactions are, well, impaired. Why would anyone think it would be a good idea to have control of anything that can kill someone?

Can't operate heavy equipment.
Can't drive anything.
Can't take care of children.
Can't be at work.

But it is OK to carry a firearm?

Again, I AM ALL FOR THE SECOND AMENDMENT, but can we exercise some clear discernment. It is not, under any circumstances, ok for anyone to carry a firearm while impaired.


How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627406
Yesterday at 03:33 PM
Yesterday at 03:33 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
If I saw a guy drinking with a firearm on his side or shoulder, I would leave that situation. Nothing good will happen there if things heat up.

To each their own opinion I guess.


How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: Wolfdog91] #8627408
Yesterday at 03:42 PM
Yesterday at 03:42 PM
Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
G
GREENCOUNTYPETE Offline
trapper
GREENCOUNTYPETE  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Sep 2013
Green County Wisconsin
Originally Posted by Wolfdog91
Weed ...baaaaddd
Alcohol ....goooooddd

Is what I feel a lot of these convos are gonna feel like lol


excessive , harmful or damaging use of any BAD

I have a relative , had an excellent job , $$$$$$ very technical , she performed her job well , but for a while was under a lot of stress from a personal relationship issue and smoked weed when she got high the night before she overslept and missed the critical start time for the operation as a contract employee they didn't re-up that contract that was some serios $

if she sees it or not , she gets to work on time now but lost that job and has a Good but not as good job than the one she lost. A lot of it may have had to do with that personal relationship she was in that went sour , but the weed didn't help.

she is still on the weed last I talked to her but maybe just on weekends now it is even legal where she is living.

I had an uncle that was an alcoholic , most dependable worker as an alcoholic you may have ever met never late for work , worked like a rented mule all day , then drank hard every night. but apparently had a shut off time he had to sleep so he was at work again.
unless he got a dui , well by his 3rd he figured out how to not drive most of the time. when he did it was on a enduro motorcycle.
that went ok till he was 32 and drove into an oak tree one winter , his girlfriend needed brakes so he took her car to the shop at work owned by my other uncle fixed her brakes then hit the tree driving home, when your dead they don't charge you with anything , but the family gets the tox screen a few days after the funeral. he definitely should not have been driving.


America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627412
Yesterday at 03:52 PM
Yesterday at 03:52 PM
Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
ky_coyote_hunter Offline
trapper
ky_coyote_hunter  Offline
trapper

Joined: Feb 2016
Kentucky
Think the SC got this one right....

To take away someones 2A right over some grass is more thug-ish than using grass and having firearms to begin with.

How many firearm owners in the 1800's were wasted on over the counter laudanam (Opium) and whiskey?....Both far more impairing as well.

Not advocating for grass here, but when you study the smear campaign on weed in the 1930's by pre- DEA lackey Henry Anslinger, and the alcohol, textile, and tobacco companies, it becomes readily apparent that it was about the money all along to demonize a substance that is actually safer than the products they were pushing.


Member - FTA
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627413
Yesterday at 03:54 PM
Yesterday at 03:54 PM
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
In North Carolina, it is illegal to carry a concealed handgun while consuming alcohol or having any alcohol in your system. This prohibition applies to both concealed and open carry. Specifically, North Carolina law states that individuals with a concealed handgun permit cannot carry if they are under the influence of alcohol or if there is any alcohol remaining in their system
.
Open Carry Restrictions
Open carry of a firearm while consuming alcohol is also prohibited. This means that individuals cannot legally open carry if they are drinking or impaired by alcohol
.
Concealed Carry in Bars
Permit holders can carry a concealed handgun in bars or restaurants that serve alcohol, but only if they have zero alcohol in their system and the establishment has not posted a sign prohibiting concealed weapons


How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627420
Yesterday at 04:58 PM
Yesterday at 04:58 PM
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
I wish someone would run for office on a platform of repealing laws. Anarchy sounds better all the time.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: danny clifton] #8627421
Yesterday at 05:08 PM
Yesterday at 05:08 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Originally Posted by danny clifton
I wish someone would run for office on a platform of repealing laws. Anarchy sounds better all the time.

Im not sure i have enough ammo for that.

Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: bowhunter27295] #8627441
Yesterday at 06:43 PM
Yesterday at 06:43 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
MN
160user Offline
trapper
160user  Offline
trapper

Joined: Jan 2007
MN
Originally Posted by Providence Farm
Maybe increasing birth rates could be seen as positive. So will give it that.


Without alcohol, many women would never get bred.


Originally Posted by bowhunter27295
If I saw a guy drinking with a firearm on his side or shoulder, I would leave that situation. Nothing good will happen there if things heat up.

To each their own opinion I guess.



You need to visit a rural Montana bar sometime. VERY polite people in there because many are visably armed.


I have nothing clever to put here.





Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: HobbieTrapper] #8627472
Yesterday at 08:55 PM
Yesterday at 08:55 PM
Joined: Mar 2019
Southern NJ
maintenanceguy Offline
trapper
maintenanceguy  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2019
Southern NJ
Originally Posted by HobbieTrapper
Originally Posted by bowhunter27295
Should she be arrested and charged with DUI if she were in her car and sped off to avoid being captured or assaulted? What if she hit another car or, GOD forbid, a person?

What if she pulled her CC and pulled the trigger too soon or too late and killed or injured a pedestrian or someone driving a car? Her faculties are definitely impaired as well as her judgement.

Do you see how intoxication muddies all waters?


A guy pulls along side my car and starts shooting at me. I swerve into his vehicle and he crashes killing his passenger. Am I criminally liable?


Which state?

Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627538
6 hours ago
6 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
Passing more law does not make the public safer. It does the opposite. IMO does not curb irresponsible people from being irresponsible. Theft, sexual assaults, violent physical assaults, are only reduced by keeping perpetrators in cages. Dangerous folks need left in those cages. They should not be released with the hope that somehow more laws will prevent them from preying on other humans. We have incarcerated more people undeserving of incarceration than those who need it. Prisons are full. Many who need caged are being released. More law is NOT the answer.


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: 160user] #8627602
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
Originally Posted by 160user
You need to visit a rural Montana bar sometime. VERY polite people in there because many are visably armed.


Nope. Got no use to go to a bar much less be around people who are armed and drinking. Bad combo. Don't care who you are.


How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627604
2 hours ago
2 hours ago
Joined: Sep 2008
NC
B
bowhunter27295 Offline
trapper
bowhunter27295  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Sep 2008
NC
In the early west, many saloons and gambling houses and brothels required checking your firearm at the door.

Wonder why?


How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: yotetrapper30] #8627611
1 hour ago
1 hour ago
Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
D
danny clifton Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
danny clifton  Offline
"Grumpy Old Man"
D

Joined: Dec 2006
williamsburg ks
only if you wanted to patronize that private business and private property


Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: danny clifton] #8627620
41 minutes ago
41 minutes ago
Joined: Dec 2008
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by danny clifton
only if you wanted to patronize that private business and private property


-Goofy
Re: SCOTUS gun ruling [Re: bowhunter27295] #8627625
1 minute ago
1 minute ago
Joined: Jun 2015
rogers city mi.
J
jeff karsten Online content
trapper
jeff karsten  Online Content
trapper
J

Joined: Jun 2015
rogers city mi.
Originally Posted by bowhunter27295
In the early west, many saloons and gambling houses and brothels required checking your firearm at the door.

Wonder why?

Probably cause the Sheriff wouldn't answer his i-phone after dark


olden tyred
Page 3 of 3 1 2 3
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread