My Kangals would no doubt make the list. There's a video of a male Kangal killing 3 pitbulls, in 24 seconds, that frequently gets put on and taken down from YouTube. The Kangal shakes the pitbulls like a terrier does a rat. Kangals have 3 1/2 times the bite force of a pitbull and about 6 times the mass. Their bite is 300 psi higher than an African lion. They are a non aggressive breed, but a very protective one.

They tried using Kangals for police and military work, but the Kangals didn't want to bite people, even when commanded to do so. The only time they could reliably get them to bite people was if the handler was "attacked". They then did so much damage, because of their massive size, bite force and tendency to bite the head and neck, that they could only be used in a lethal situation.

Muslims are getting all dogs banned in parts of most European countries and in parts of the US including places in New York, Michigan, Virginia and Texas. Large numbers of people have been attacked by muslims for walking dogs near mosques, enough so that may Western cities now put up signs preventing dogs near them.

If pitbulls are banned, all large and medium breeds will be at risk of being banned and even some of the tiny ones like chihuahuas, which frequently bite people.

If I don't like something, I don't feel obligated to make sure other people can't have it. I just don't get it. I wish everyone felt the same way.

Keith

RC

If im against 10 year olds from driving and against 13 year olds from being able to buy dynamite at the hardware story am i also anti 2nd amendment by your broad logic? Too many citizens are not sensible and responsible enough to own a animal as dangerous as a pit bull. Unlike the 2nd amendment a pitbull serves no necessary purpose for most people. If you had a real purpose to own them for say hog hunting then go through a regulatory process to own them.

The idea you presented by comparing regulating pitbulls to gun rights is pretty broad if you start getting into the logic behind it. Id be surprised if you didnt think it was alright for the government to regulate something which would make your simple logic of directly comparing gun rights to regulating pitbull ownership look a bit ignorant from my point of view.

^^^retarded

Im glad i could clear up the issue

Never said I care for pitbulls . Did I ?

Thank you O wise man

I will try to go full on retard so I have the mental ability to join this thread. I will tell you this, I have a neighbor that likes Pit Bulls and has owned many. If you Lab comes across the road to take a dump in my yard I am fine with that. If you PB comes into my yard, that means I have to dig another hole and I am running out of places to dig.

Who cares ?

I will try to go full on retard so I have the mental ability to join this thread. I will tell you this, I have a neighbor that likes Pit Bulls and has owned many. If you Lab comes across the road to take a dump in my yard I am fine with that. If you PB comes into my yard, that means I have to dig another hole and I am running out of places to dig.

See, that is what I like about you.........NOTHING.

Glad you stepped up to the plate Yes sir .

I will try to go full on retard so I have the mental ability to join this thread. I will tell you this, I have a neighbor that likes Pit Bulls and has owned many. If you Lab comes across the road to take a dump in my yard I am fine with that. If you PB comes into my yard, that means I have to dig another hole and I am running out of places to dig.

Who cares what you like ? Just got to put your two cents in that's not worth one .

In that case, I hope a Pit Bull chews your face off while taking a dump at an Arby's in a bad neighborhood.

Don't ever see that happening , but I guess you can dream .

Yeah, the poor dog would probably have to lick it's butt for a week just to get the taste out of it's mouth. No dog deserves that.