No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter
"TRUMP: Take the firearms first and then go to court. Because that’s another system. A lot of times by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida. He had a lot of firearms. They saw everything. To go to court would have taken a long time. You could do exactly what you’re saying but take the guns first, go through due process second."
I watched the entire meeting. While I certainly don't agree with that statement, the one the trolls cherry-picked from the hour-plus-long meeting, there were many other positive points made.
The President talked about hardening schools with trained, armed personnel and eliminating "gun free zones."
He talked about how law enforcement dropped the ball and how that needs to change, authorities need to act on tips not ignore them.
He talked about wanting common-sense ideas that would protect law-abiding gun-owners while keeping guns out of the hands of crazies.
He talked about how modern culture has lessened the value of human life and dignity.
He reminded the room full of senators from both sides of the aisle that he is a big fan of 2A and the NRA.
But you wont hear any of that from the liberal troll crowd...
Eh...wot?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6173705 02/28/1810:12 PM02/28/1810:12 PM
Should be asking ourselves what is due process. I didn't think it was something to set aside in times of crisis, made up ones or real ones. Those are the times due process really matters. Do you think trump misspoke or is he really that dumb?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6173839 02/28/1811:56 PM02/28/1811:56 PM
I want to think Trump had a momentary lapse where he was unaware of the implications of what he said and that anyone was listening, let alone the context in which it was said.
"Those who hammer their guns into plowshares will plow for those who do not."
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Tweed]
#6173843 03/01/1812:00 AM03/01/1812:00 AM
Anyways...the partisan blindness is strong on this thread...
What would your response be if the person had a "D" in front of their name?
'Nother example of politics is a waste.
I think if the "r"s were changed to "d"s right now, we wouldn't have to worry about it because there would be another semi ban already through the congress and been signed by now.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6173844 03/01/1812:01 AM03/01/1812:01 AM
Now we have republican's who support warrantless spying on Americansvia the NSA with no due process in violation of the 4th amendment and no due process regarding the 2nd amendment. Scary stuff.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6173849 03/01/1812:06 AM03/01/1812:06 AM
If someone is posting on the net claiming they will be the next school shooter upper I have no problem with the authorities going to them and disarming them and placing them in custody to be evaluated.
If I know a person is armed and they tell me they are going to shoot me I would disarm them. No due process for them at all at that place and time.
What would you do if you saw someone about to enter a school armed with an ar-15?
Wait to see what they do?
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Tweed]
#6173853 03/01/1812:12 AM03/01/1812:12 AM
"Due process" as required by our Constitution would require at least some kind of a hearing, with the opportunity to be heard and be represented by counsel, before a judge.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6173862 03/01/1812:17 AM03/01/1812:17 AM
Just so it’s known it is not a long process with probable cause to remove firearms from someone. Then again if the crazy lunatic is going to do something it’s not like it’s extremely hard to acquire s firearm.
Member NTA,ISTA, FTA
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Tweed]
#6174027 03/01/1808:27 AM03/01/1808:27 AM
What would your response be if the person had a "D" in front of their name?
My response would be a yawn and a shake of my head. I'm am quite well aware of the gun-grabbing tendencies of liberals (most D's) and nothing they cook up gets much of a reaction from me anymore.
I continue to vocally and financially support gun rights groups and am thankful everyday there is not a D in the whitehouse making good on the anti-gun platform all three prominent D presidential candidates ran on.
Eh...wot?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: trapper les]
#6174069 03/01/1809:45 AM03/01/1809:45 AM
I want to think Trump had a momentary lapse where he was unaware of the implications of what he said and that anyone was listening, let alone the context in which it was said.
Momentary Lapse??? Lets take away due process and profile the POTUS... My profile..I'd say Blow hard, be more appropriate than Lapse.. Talks in circles half the time insults and name calls everyone the other half..More DUFUS than POTUS Oups now I just made myself a bad man..
Mac
"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Lugnut]
#6174073 03/01/1809:50 AM03/01/1809:50 AM
"Due process" as required by our Constitution would require at least some kind of a hearing, with the opportunity to be heard and be represented by counsel, before a judge.
Jim
Here's how you do that.
Said person announces that they want to be the next "school shooter".
Go to their address, question them about their post. If agreeing to said post.
Arrest them. Remove their guns for the trial date. Then let the process unfold.
What would happen if someone announced they want to kill the president? Arrested.............!
When watching the president yesterday, I thought Diane Feinstein was going to pee her pants with joy.
She looked like the Joker!
Last edited by seniortrap; 03/01/1810:02 AM.
Vietnam--1967 46th. Const./Combat Engineers
"Chaotic action is preferable to orderly inaction." "After the first shot, all plans go out the window!"
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174095 03/01/1810:16 AM03/01/1810:16 AM
Asking for forgiveness instead of permission is a common term used when people, groups or agencies want to do something they know is controversial and or not likely to take place, yet in the situation with firearms I guess that is not an appreciated thought process. President Trump to me is a good example of one who under a stiffer mental health code might not be able to own a firearm yet there are millions who would help him reload so he can continue on.
Bryce
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174108 03/01/1810:33 AM03/01/1810:33 AM
U libs r right that Trump doesn't act like prior presidents. That is why he got elected. We r tired of the same old crap. The man is not a seasoned politician and that is why he is there-he is cleaning out the mess left by the prior presidents. He just keeps those D's guessing what's gonna happen next. Even though he's been hittin some speed bumps he's doin what we put him there to do! 5 stars yet!
NRALIFER,PRPA LIFER,HUNTER,FURTAKER
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: SNIPERBBB]
#6174126 03/01/1810:51 AM03/01/1810:51 AM
Unless you show what they were talking about, nothing but a liberal sound bite.
They were talking about someone who was already declared mentally ill by a doctor.
Quote:
Vice President Mike Pence: Violence, restraining orders, California has a version of this. And I think in your meeting with governors earlier this week, individually, and as a group, we spoke about the states taking steps. But the focus is to literally give families and give local law enforcement additional tools if an individual is reported to be a potential danger to themselves or others. Allow due process so no one’s rights are trampled but the ability to go to court, obtain an order and collect not only the firearms but any weapons in the possession.
President Trump: Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court. Because that’s another system. A lot of times by the time you go to court, it takes so long to go to court, to get the due process procedures. I like taking the guns early. Like in this crazy man’s case that just took place in Florida. He had a lot of firearms. They saw everything. To go to court would have taken a long time. You could do exactly what you’re saying but take the guns first, go through due process second.
U libs r right that Trump doesn't act like prior presidents. That is why he got elected. We r tired of the same old crap. The man is not a seasoned politician and that is why he is there-he is cleaning out the mess left by the prior presidents. He just keeps those D's guessing what's gonna happen next. Even though he's been hittin some speed bumps he's doin what we put him there to do! 5 stars yet!
So conservatives disliked their own elected officials so much they voted in the class clown to straighten things out??? My old man would have said you cut off your nose to spit your face..
So your ok with him knocking on your door. Taking your guns because you said something to someone.. then government folks deciding if you meet their idea of nuts or not??? Cops couldn't find time to run the list of folks that could end up with them knocking on your door..Probably some of us on this post.
Mac
"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174175 03/01/1811:25 AM03/01/1811:25 AM
Yep BBB, they were talking about people who already have problems. Here in Pa. and i'm sure most states, you can't have a weapon if you have a restraining order against you. What Trump was saying, Refering to Pences statement about such people, no need to go to court again to take the weapons.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174176 03/01/1811:25 AM03/01/1811:25 AM
If you left your trapperman account open and someone with nefarious intent posted what you just wrote, under your name and account, you'd be fine having your weapons seized with no due process?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: bblwi]
#6174209 03/01/1811:50 AM03/01/1811:50 AM
Asking for forgiveness instead of permission is a common term used when people, groups or agencies want to do something they know is controversial and or not likely to take place, yet in the situation with firearms I guess that is not an appreciated thought process. President Trump to me is a good example of one who under a stiffer mental health code might not be able to own a firearm yet there are millions who would help him reload so he can continue on.
Bryce
I am sure a code can be written to a point none of us can own guns?????? You can make a code any way you want? So yes I am sure under a stiffer mental code no one on trapperman might not be able to own a firearm.
J
Suppression rules/prevention drools
Confidence is going fly fishing for Moby Dick, in a row boat, and bringing tartar sauce with you.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174210 03/01/1811:51 AM03/01/1811:51 AM
Yes. If you leave your account open and someone sends death threats you're going to have to deal with it. Don't leave your accounts open where nefarious people have access. Would you knowingly leave your wallet at the mall and think it's not your fault someone used your CC card?
Last edited by Jonnytrapper; 03/01/1811:51 AM.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: FlyinFinn]
#6174211 03/01/1811:52 AM03/01/1811:52 AM
If you left your trapperman account open and someone with nefarious intent posted what you just wrote, under your name and account, you'd be fine having your weapons seized with no due process?
Exactly, and no; not cool with that at all.
Jeex around a firehouse people leave their accounts open all the time, would be nothing to post some foolishness on there and cause all kindsa issues.
J
Suppression rules/prevention drools
Confidence is going fly fishing for Moby Dick, in a row boat, and bringing tartar sauce with you.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: hippie]
#6174213 03/01/1811:53 AM03/01/1811:53 AM
Yep BBB, they were talking about people who already have problems. Here in Pa. and i'm sure most states, you can't have a weapon if you have a restraining order against you. What Trump was saying, Refering to Pences statement about such people, no need to go to court again to take the weapons.
Yes. If you leave your account open and someone sends death threats you're going to have to deal with it. Don't leave your accounts open where nefarious people have access. Would you knowingly leave your wallet at the mall and think it's not your fault someone used your CC card?
Nefarious? while I dont think a crew mate would go so far, I do know you leave your account open it will came back writtne in japanese as your main language.
And again, no - not cool with it at all.
Hitler, Stalin, democrats (gestapo) all start by taking guns away without due process.
Suppression rules/prevention drools
Confidence is going fly fishing for Moby Dick, in a row boat, and bringing tartar sauce with you.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: hippie]
#6174219 03/01/1811:57 AM03/01/1811:57 AM
For the first time we are getting to see what normally happened behind closed doors, thanks to Trump.
You liberals here wetting yourselfs, could you amagine what Obama or Clinton may have said about guns when we couldn't hear them?
Bet you'd change your tune about being a supporting Democrat if we could've!
Your never going to have closed door meetings with both sides present without threat of imprisonement. One or both will sprint to the first microphone decrying what the nasty other side presented. Unless both sides don't want the public to find out.
Which is worse, a gun grabber who tells you to your face that his intent is to take them, or those that allow and support undercutting the Constitution all while telling you they support the 2nd amendment?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: JakeDog]
#6174224 03/01/1811:59 AM03/01/1811:59 AM
Yes. If you leave your account open and someone sends death threats you're going to have to deal with it. Don't leave your accounts open where nefarious people have access. Would you knowingly leave your wallet at the mall and think it's not your fault someone used your CC card?
Nefarious? while I dont think a crew mate would go so far, I do know you leave your account open it will came back writtne in japanese as your main language.
And again, no - not cool with it at all.
Hitler, Stalin, democrats (gestapo) all start by taking guns away without due process.
I'm got talking about permanently or without probably cause.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: SNIPERBBB]
#6174252 03/01/1812:23 PM03/01/1812:23 PM
For the first time we are getting to see what normally happened behind closed doors, thanks to Trump.
You liberals here wetting yourselfs, could you amagine what Obama or Clinton may have said about guns when we couldn't hear them?
Bet you'd change your tune about being a supporting Democrat if we could've!
Your never going to have closed door meetings with both sides present without threat of imprisonement. One or both will sprint to the first microphone decrying what the nasty other side presented. Unless both sides don't want the public to find out.
You can go there if you want, but i'm sure most understood what i said, you included.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174259 03/01/1812:32 PM03/01/1812:32 PM
I doubt that. Your claiming that cameras are always rolling for public consumption everytime Trump meets with someone. That's absurd in the extreme and very stupid if it was.
I guess I don't see why we don't use what is in place now. If someone makes a threat to a school, someone needs to bring it to the school's attention. The school principal goes to the courthouse and request a Restraining Order. He fills it out, and checks the box requesting the Sheriff's Department assistance in serving it. You check box that he has weapons and request the judge orders that he surrenders them until the Injunction Hearing. Around here at least, the clerk walks it to the Judge's Office and it is signed within the hour. Sheriff department start's looking him and the guns. Now they have until the Injunction Hearing to sort everything out, Chapter 51 eval, or charge him with a crime. Either way, the threatening person can be looked at, and the process is started immediately.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: trapdad]
#6174302 03/01/1801:25 PM03/01/1801:25 PM
That's the way it should work trapdad and you're right, there are existing laws to take care of those types of situations. In the case of the Parkland shooting, school administrators and law enforcement repeatedly dropped the ball.
Eh...wot?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: SNIPERBBB]
#6174317 03/01/1801:38 PM03/01/1801:38 PM
I doubt that. Your claiming that cameras are always rolling for public consumption everytime Trump meets with someone. That's absurd in the extreme and very stupid if it was.
I never claimed such. I claimed you never saw these before, and i'm correct on that.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174322 03/01/1801:44 PM03/01/1801:44 PM
I doubt that. Your claiming that cameras are always rolling for public consumption everytime Trump meets with someone. That's absurd in the extreme and very stupid if it was.
I never claimed such. I claimed you never saw these before, and i'm correct on that.
Saw what before? A public meeting with politicians? Obama did these all the time before he became a lame duck in 2010 and Trump is doing them now. Unfortunately it looks like these meetings could actually produce legislation.
You can look(and Sandy Hook was after 2010), I don't care whether anyone has closed door meetings or open meetings. I generally don't trust these political theater, all the browbeating to get the politicians in line will be behind the scenes.
You know people should understand that anytime you have an initial meeting like that, whether closed or open, you should expect to hear dumb things and dumb ideas. The purpose of those meetings to float ideas. These ideas might be off the top of their head and half thought out ideas. This how things come about. You look at several ideas, sort out the bad ones, and pick the best. Any good meeting should appreciate the free flow of thoughts. Sometimes a good process comes out of left field, misspoken thought. There is no sense in getting wrapped up about how a THOUGHT comes out. Especially in the sound bite clips we get bombarded with. What matters is official process or legislation that comes out. People make mistakes when speaking openly.
Last edited by trapdad; 03/01/1802:42 PM.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174372 03/01/1802:42 PM03/01/1802:42 PM
Trumpsplaining:. The act of trying to clarify or explain what Trump's contradicting and often factually bereft word barfs ACTUALLY mean while simultaneously claiming it doesn't actually mean what Trump actually said. usually performed by common Trump fanboys, magicians, or most often by Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
Last edited by Bucksnorts; 03/01/1803:28 PM.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174419 03/01/1803:31 PM03/01/1803:31 PM
Trumpsplaining: The crickets from the left after Trump does good for America after they jumped on every word he said earlier.
The biggest error in your assumptions is that you believe Trump critics are all "lefties". However, it is human nature to blanket our beliefs in false assumptions to protect the ego. I understand.
Last edited by Bucksnorts; 03/01/1803:36 PM.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174431 03/01/1803:44 PM03/01/1803:44 PM
At least on the gun deal he took the time to meet with both parties and offer his insights and opinions. On the tariff issue he never even contacted Congressional leaders on his position and now we see the businesses reeling to find out where that will take us in the future. Trust is a big issue when working in the unbelievably subjective world of politics.
Bryce
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174441 03/01/1804:05 PM03/01/1804:05 PM
Just wait until the republicans lose more seats in November (maybe the majority), some of you guys will be working overtime making up excuses for Trump. He will flip on all kinds of issues because its how you play a reality TV show. He believes in nothing.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Blaine County]
#6174475 03/01/1804:38 PM03/01/1804:38 PM
Just wait until the republicans lose more seats in November (maybe the majority), some of you guys will be working overtime making up excuses for Trump. He will flip on all kinds of issues because its how you play a reality TV show. He believes in nothing.
Living in a free society means you accept that there will be bad with the good...
If we abided by the 2A as it was written then we would have a little more faith in the due process clause.
All of the rights enumerated in the Constitution work hand in hand with each other. You start screwing around or amending one right and the rest might as well be toilet paper.
If we truly abided by the Constitution..."I'm going to be a professional school shooter" could be countered with, "You're going to be professional Swiss cheese if you try."
How will I explain myself to my grandkids when they all must suffer at the whims of a tyrant because I chose to protect their parents from a statistically microscopic threat?
Mike
One man with a gun may control 100 others who have none.
Vladimir Lenin
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174558 03/01/1806:11 PM03/01/1806:11 PM
You know people should understand that anytime you have an initial meeting like that, whether closed or open, you should expect to hear dumb things and dumb ideas. The purpose of those meetings to float ideas. These ideas might be off the top of their head and half thought out ideas. This how things come about. You look at several ideas, sort out the bad ones, and pick the best. Any good meeting should appreciate the free flow of thoughts. Sometimes a good process comes out of left field, misspoken thought. There is no sense in getting wrapped up about how a THOUGHT comes out. Especially in the sound bite clips we get bombarded with. What matters is official process or legislation that comes out. People make mistakes when speaking openly.
Originally Posted By: trapdad
Saying take the guns now and worry about due process later, is just a crass and stupid way word the process that is place now... Restraining orders.
Exactly right on both counts.
Eh...wot?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Tweed]
#6174664 03/01/1808:23 PM03/01/1808:23 PM
U libs r right that Trump doesn't act like prior presidents. That is why he got elected. We r tired of the same old crap. The man is not a seasoned politician and that is why he is there-he is cleaning out the mess left by the prior presidents. He just keeps those D's guessing what's gonna happen next. Even though he's been hittin some speed bumps he's doin what we put him there to do! 5 stars yet!
So conservatives disliked their own elected officials so much they voted in the class clown to straighten things out??? My old man would have said you cut off your nose to spit your face..
So your ok with him knocking on your door. Taking your guns because you said something to someone.. then government folks deciding if you meet their idea of nuts or not??? Cops couldn't find time to run the list of folks that could end up with them knocking on your door..Probably some of us on this post.
Mac
X2
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Mike in A-town]
#6174801 03/01/1810:05 PM03/01/1810:05 PM
Living in a free society means you accept that there will be bad with the good...
If we abided by the 2A as it was written then we would have a little more faith in the due process clause.
All of the rights enumerated in the Constitution work hand in hand with each other. You start screwing around or amending one right and the rest might as well be toilet paper.
If we truly abided by the Constitution..."I'm going to be a professional school shooter" could be countered with, "You're going to be professional Swiss cheese if you try."
How will I explain myself to my grandkids when they all must suffer at the whims of a tyrant because I chose to protect their parents from a statistically microscopic threat?
Mike
Well put.
People care about the 2nd but not the rest of the Constitution without realizing without the rest there will be no 2nd because there will be no Constitution at all . You have to take it all or none.
You only live once, so get over it!
Tactics may change but the goal remains the same.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6174802 03/01/1810:05 PM03/01/1810:05 PM
nsa is illegally spying on people, warrantless searches are routinely conducted by local law enforcement, property (cash) is still being seized without any charges being filed.
more government lawlessness shouldn't surprise anyone. this stuff is going on because people accept it. we were well trained to accept it from birth. indoctrination continues with metal detectors school lock downs and book bag searches.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6175084 03/02/1806:41 AM03/02/1806:41 AM
The root problem with James original post is that Conservatives do not consider their president a King, savoir or despot. We consider our elected to be employees so to speak. If one gets something wrong, learns from it, while tying hard to solve a problem, we keep them on a while longer. The Libs consider their elected, Gods and leaders and such and soil themselves if one would even use incorrect grammar. I give Trump a lot of credit for having a bipartisan forum, even though it would open him up for constant criticism and more childish rhetoric. I give this story a big nothingburger and James an A+ for his CNN resume'.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: GROUSEWIT]
#6175123 03/02/1808:23 AM03/02/1808:23 AM
nsa is illegally spying on people, warrantless searches are routinely conducted by local law enforcement, property (cash) is still being seized without any charges being filed.
more government lawlessness shouldn't surprise anyone. this stuff is going on because people accept it. we were well trained to accept it from birth. indoctrination continues with metal detectors school lock downs and book bag searches.
I was taught it's better to be judged by 12 than carried by 6. They do so many things now at schools that teach kids they have no due process. While they are just children and are still learning what are they teaching them? They should be taught to understand why there is a line of order to their being disciplined. I agree the government and law enforcement already have enough things they do that assumes someone is guilty until proven innocent. I didn't care for Hillary but I also didn't care to hear Trump keep yelling "Lock her Up!" Mr Trump show us your taxes. No their being audited and I want my due process first.. Can't have it both ways can you?
Mac
Last edited by Macthediver; 03/02/1808:56 AM.
"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6175142 03/02/1808:59 AM03/02/1808:59 AM
I don't know Danny, look at what he said. Finn may not have been behind someone any better when it comes to how the gov't should interject itself. His words. Also doesn't think mentally ill should have guns.
The root problem with James original post is that Conservatives do not consider their president a King, savoir or despot. We consider our elected to be employees so to speak. If one gets something wrong, learns from it, while tying hard to solve a problem, we keep them on a while longer. The Libs consider their elected, Gods and leaders and such and soil themselves if one would even use incorrect grammar. I give Trump a lot of credit for having a bipartisan forum, even though it would open him up for constant criticism and more childish rhetoric. I give this story a big nothingburger and James an A+ for his CNN resume'.
Aha! Caught you! You didn't read the OP, did you?
Hint: It's all Trump's words.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6175839 03/02/1807:54 PM03/02/1807:54 PM
In the wake of the mass shooting in Orlando that left 49 victims dead, Johnson says Americans would be safer if guns were more readily available, not more restricted
From your link hippie
Quote:
Orlando shooting at Pulse nightclub
"All these atrocities have been happening in gun-free zones," he declares. "If there were law-abiding citizens that were carrying weapons — I'm not saying they would lessen the impact of these horrible atrocities, but maybe, maybe they could."
Johnson says the laws permitting "concealed carry" in some states have reduced violent crime. A criminal might think, he suggests, "Gee, do I try to steal this woman's purse in this parking lot, or seven or eight of these people who are around here, are they carrying weapons and I might get hurt, so I'm going to not accost her." Over the past five years, he himself has purchased two guns, kept at his home in Taos, for self-protection.
He also sees possession of guns as a bulwark against government tyranny.
"I mean, there have been atrocious drug raids and atrocious drug raids that have resulted in the death of individuals that were completely innocent," he says. "I would just ask the question, if the DEA knew they were raiding someone's home where they had automatic weapons, if that was just a known element of 'we're going to raid these people,' would they have raided them in the first place, just knowing that they had that deterrent?"
Even so, Johnson also says he has a "nuanced" view of the Libertarian Party platform plank, which opposes "all laws at any level of government" restricting guns. "We should be open to a discussion on keeping guns out of the hands of the mentally ill," he says. "I don't know how that manifests itself, but I'm looking to get elected president of the United States. I just want to let people know I have an open mind about how we might, how government might, interject itself in a lot of the problems we have."
Sounds better than eliminating due process to me
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6175844 03/02/1807:59 PM03/02/1807:59 PM
Problem is Trump has no working knowledge of the constitution. So when he speaks and his foot ends up in his mouth , one of his advisors has to let him know he is a baboon and hen he fixes it. Credit for him fixing. I think.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6175860 03/02/1808:13 PM03/02/1808:13 PM
Trump should just quit and let the babboons continue on the losing course they're on. He will be fine. Why should he care about his country? He's fighting a losing battle. The left will gladly see the US fail in order to see Trump leave office.
Last edited by Gary Benson; 03/02/1808:22 PM.
Life ain't supposed to be easy.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6175889 03/02/1808:35 PM03/02/1808:35 PM
U libs r right that Trump doesn't act like prior presidents. That is why he got elected. We r tired of the same old crap. The man is not a seasoned politician and that is why he is there-he is cleaning out the mess left by the prior presidents. He just keeps those D's guessing what's gonna happen next. Even though he's been hittin some speed bumps he's doin what we put him there to do! 5 stars yet!
So conservatives disliked their own elected officials so much they voted in the class clown to straighten things out??? My old man would have said you cut off your nose to spit your face..
So your ok with him knocking on your door. Taking your guns because you said something to someone.. then government folks deciding if you meet their idea of nuts or not??? Cops couldn't find time to run the list of folks that could end up with them knocking on your door..Probably some of us on this post.
Mac
Have you been watching Trump on tariffs, He "said" he was putting a 20% tariff on steel imports, To help increase US steel jobs, good union jobs. You guys coming over yet. Or is witch hunting just too fun?
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6177166 03/04/1808:45 AM03/04/1808:45 AM
Unions are one of the reasons we don't have a steel industry anymore. Its why cars are only assembled in the U.S. Unions should not be national. Unions are controlled by organized crime. If unions had never gone national that wouldn't be the case.
I believe we need a steel industry. The inability to produce all the steel we use has the potential to be a BIG problem. We don't need the unions. At least not on a national level.
Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6177170 03/04/1808:48 AM03/04/1808:48 AM
I am not a union man. My point is that union guys will search for anything to help justify their Dem vote. I was just showing them that Trump has already done more for the unions in 1 years than Obama did in 8. Maybe give Trump a little credit from time to time. Gun deaths in Chicago are down 27% since he took office. This was reported on the liberal news this morning. Trumps commitment to LE working? Maybe we needed the class clown, I was getting sick of the teachers pet.
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: danny clifton]
#6177179 03/04/1809:02 AM03/04/1809:02 AM
BTW diggerman, just how much money did your gangster union bosses spend, of your money, to elect Hillary???????????????????????
They spent 100% of my money, Apparently you have to be "vested" for 10 years or they steal your retirement.
I've worked both union and non-union jobs. I agree with Danny there are crooks in some unions the money does that to people. Thing is Trump is used to being the boss not an employee. So he can just say "Your Fired!" At least when you work in a union you have a contract with some recourse for (Due Process) when the boss says your fired. So Trump is very used to not giving someone Due Process, he don't like ya.. Your fired! Same as take your guns then decide if you should have lost them.. But he has already changed his tune. Must be scared of the NRA?? or just going in circles thinking every one will still love him.
Mac
"Never Forget Which Way Is Up"
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: Macthediver]
#6178176 03/05/1801:58 AM03/05/1801:58 AM
If Obama and Hilary are going to hang there will be a lot of other gallows that need to be built as well. Good way to increase the jobs and maybe good paying ones as well.
Bryce
Re: Trump proposes seizing guns before due process
[Re: James]
#6178565 03/05/1802:47 PM03/05/1802:47 PM