email sent to Bill & TA just now, will post if response received:
"1:59 PM (1 minute ago)
to bduke, tduke
I whole-heartedly understand competition and the need to break into new silos/product streams to accurately compete and gain and/or maintain market share. I'm not entirely sure I understand the blatant copy/paste of this new trap while taking the naming convention at the same time. I was hoping you might be able to expand my understanding of the decision or design before I make a call on continuing to support Duke with future trapping purchases."
Response from Bill, I issue no opinion one way or the other on it:
Bill Duke
2:55 PM (7 minutes ago)
to me
Brent,
I am glad you asked about this topic as there is a lot of misunderstanding from the general trapping public.
First, it is not unusual or illegal for companies developing new products to use the best available features in their new products.
I could give you numerous examples of this throughout the history of trap manufacturing.
Second, competition is good for the trapping public. Think about all the trappers who have access to high quality equipment today.
Some trappers like higher end traps and some trappers are budget minded. But all trappers have a choice in the equipment they use. We respect that choice.
We have built our business supplying trappers with reasonably priced equipment and supporting future trappers so the tradition continues.
The new Duke Pro Series 550 OS has huge support from trappers and dealers who are looking for alternatives to higher priced traps.
The responsible course is to keep an open mind to the product and evaluate it for yourself. We think you will be pleased when it becomes available.
Bill DukeMy response:
Thank you for the response Bill.
Before I make further judgement as you have a few salient points - while you respect the choice of trappers to have varying degrees of price points, I'm curious to see if you respected the trapper who designed those features mimicked and worked out a side deal for a portion of the design, etc? Just trying to find the angle where I continue to support Duke on this as it seems a line was crossed. Albeit not an illegal or unusual one, just an uncomfortable one.
Thanks again for your response. Respect the heck out of what you have built company wise but this one is tough swallowing so far.