Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: nramemb]
#7280811
06/06/21 03:06 PM
06/06/21 03:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,074 North East Kansas
Marty
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 21,074
North East Kansas
|
everything today is maneuvered 'within the rules' so it goes how the progressives want it to go....court decisions, elections, laws and the list goes on...
E 'Honey Badger Militia' Sleep, the anti woke adote.
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: nramemb]
#7280908
06/06/21 07:07 PM
06/06/21 07:07 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,337 The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane
"HOSS"
|
"HOSS"
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,337
The Hill Country of Texas
|
Maneuvers or not if I feel infringed the offending law should be scrapped.
.I approve of this message
“What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.” Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: nramemb]
#7280937
06/06/21 07:56 PM
06/06/21 07:56 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,337 The Hill Country of Texas
Leftlane
"HOSS"
|
"HOSS"
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 20,337
The Hill Country of Texas
|
To even try to understand a liberals definition of an assault rifle is near impossible
Last edited by Leftlane; 06/06/21 08:00 PM.
“What’s good for me may not be good for the weak minded.” Captain Gus McCrae- Texas Rangers
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: nramemb]
#7280958
06/06/21 08:37 PM
06/06/21 08:37 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379 Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
James
"Minka"
|
"Minka"
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 17,379
Coeur d' Alene, Idaho
|
Great news!
I knew those donations would help.
Jim
Forum Infidel since 2001
"And that troll bs is something triggered snowflakes say when they dont like what someone posts." - Boco
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: white17]
#7281269
06/07/21 11:08 AM
06/07/21 11:08 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,338 Fairbanks, Alaska
Pete in Frbks
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 4,338
Fairbanks, Alaska
|
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level. Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case Well, aren't we just overly positive and optimistic today.....! Pete
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: white17]
#7281289
06/07/21 12:06 PM
06/07/21 12:06 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,226 Alaska and Washington State
waggler
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,226
Alaska and Washington State
|
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level. Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case I'm curious why you don't think that SCOTUS will take up this case; especially considering the current makeup of the court. I would assume that if the majority are contructionists, they would want to address this before the Court might be changed by court packing.
"My life is better than your vacation"
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: waggler]
#7281299
06/07/21 12:30 PM
06/07/21 12:30 PM
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,175 McGrath, AK
white17
"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
|
"General (Mr.Sunshine) Washington"
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 35,175
McGrath, AK
|
I suspect that CA will request an en banc hearing from the 9th and that will be the end of the favorable ruling until another ten years have passed. Once SCOTUS is configured the way the DEMS prefer it, then the case might be heard at that level. Or, more likely, the 9th will issue a permanent stay and just never get around to hearing the case I'm curious why you don't think that SCOTUS will take up this case; especially considering the current makeup of the court. I would assume that if the majority are contructionists, they would want to address this before the Court might be changed by court packing. A couple of reasons. First, before it can get to SCOTUS there needs to be two or more conflicting decisions from the appellate level. Let's assume that the 9th circuit smacks down the lower court's decision. Then the plaintiffs could appeal to SCOTUS. But 2A cases have been rejected for the past ten years because the strict constuctionists on the court could not trust that Roberts would not betray them. So they might not hear this challenge to CA law. I don't really think that calculus has changed very much. We sure can't count on Roberts and I'm not convinced about Kavanaugh either. But if the 9th supports the lower court AND for instance IL or NY pass a similar law, and IF it was challenged up to the circuit level, and IF that different circuit found against IL/NY now you have two opposing decisions on the same issue, from two different appellate courts. I think SCOTUS would be more likely to consider hearing that case..............but it would take several years to get to that point. The best that we can reasonably hope for is that the 9th circuit will uphold the lower court's decision. I will be very surprised if that happens. CA may not appeal that decision if they fear that SCOTUS will rule against them. A decision like that would apply to the entire country rather than only those states covered by the 9th circuit. Democrats do not want that outcome.
Mean As Nails
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: hippie]
#7281323
06/07/21 01:24 PM
06/07/21 01:24 PM
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,226 Alaska and Washington State
waggler
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 9,226
Alaska and Washington State
|
Exactly what I had read White. They don't want it appealed because with Trumps remake of the 9th questions their ruling and even if they reverse it and its appealed to SCOTUS, they feel they'll lose.
Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled, but I'm love'n it!!! "Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled"; Really? Libs in generally don't like to work, or do anything else productive; that requires effort and thought. The process of selecting judges (not just yapping about the nominee) takes time and effort. This time their laziness bit them in the butt. I'm love'n it too.
"My life is better than your vacation"
|
|
|
Re: Federal Judge Strikes Down California’s Assault We
[Re: hippie]
#7281327
06/07/21 01:32 PM
06/07/21 01:32 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,150 Tennessee
Scuba1
"color blind Kraut"
|
"color blind Kraut"
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 16,150
Tennessee
|
Exactly what I had read White. They don't want it appealed because with Trumps remake of the 9th questions their ruling and even if they reverse it and its appealed to SCOTUS, they feel they'll lose.
Hard to believe the libs left that many seats to be filled, but I'm love'n it!!! Well O bummer thought he would leave that chore to Hilderbeast when she takes office. They never thought that Trump would win.
Let's go Brandon
"Shall not comply" with morons who don't understand "shall not infringe."
|
|
|
|
|