I doubt it. Just like the real truth about the President Kennedy assassination has never come out.

Canada is in the process of banning semi-autos. It can and will happen to a country near you.

That would be a wonderful Christmas.

They have said this crap for years and still nothing has happened.

Not for lack of trying.

the forwardness is changing , they hinted at things tried to make them make have some justification , they are getting bold

and yes things have happened small , incremental , to think that there isn't a constant steady march towards greater and greater restriction is naive.

if 55 years ago you told a WWII vet that he was going to have to go to a special federally licensed gun dealer to buy a gun or to sell it to a friend , neighbor , or relative they have known for years. that is the way it is in some states already.
or that a government would keep a list of "safe" guns bu that the list had nothing to do with the safety of the guns it was entirely to limit the guns available to the people of that state by exact make , model and even color.
that your kid going to school after having gone hunting with his 22 rifle locked in the trunk of his car would be grounds for expulsion and he could be made a felon and stripped of his right to own that gun.
or that a 20 year old service member might be delayed the purchase of a rifle to go hunting for 10 days just because of his age.

it is constant and incrimental

do you think it is a coincidence that the reporting of drunk driving has a multi page form that must be filled out to track it exactly down to place of last serve yet the fbi wants no reporting on firearms homicides and mass shootings they could require extreme detail yet they take media reports of the event as their reporting.

Plenty is changing.

Yet the worse mass shooting in the USA, Las Vegas, there has been little reporting of it and we will never know what ,why or how it happened.
The media , politicians and bureaucrats only use and hype the crisis that fits their narrative.

Maybe you're too young to remember, but the Clinton ban that lasted 10 yrs is why there's one sitting in my collection. Ammo and reloading components have not reached the accessibility levels of pre-ban levels almost 20 yrs since the ban expired.

Don't kid yourself, given half the chance they would ban them.

The way crime rates are climbing in the cities, a ban is definitely needed.

Yea, got some relatives like that. When they start talking their crap I just look at at them and say," intelligent people shut up when they don't know what they are talking about". They get a little upset but none of them want to engage me so we smile and they stay on their side of the room and I kick back and watch the game.

keep empowering these freedom-haters and they'll eventually succeed.

"In 1989, the George H. W. Bush administration had banned the importation of foreign-made, semiautomatic rifles deemed not to have "a legitimate sporting use." It did not affect similar but domestically-manufactured rifles."


"In the Presidential campaign last year Mr. Bush, a hunter and longtime member of the N.R.A., opposed to any bans on assault weapons. But a public outcry after a drifter armed with an AK-47 killed five schoolchildren in Stockton, Calif., in January helped convince others in the Administration that some limits were needed.
At the urging of William J. Bennett, the director of national drug control policy, the Administration suspended imports of certain types of semiautomatic assault rifles in March. The President expanded that temporary ban as part of a broader anticrime program that he announced in April, and said he would make it permanent for imported weapons that did not have a legitimate sporting use."

George sr was a cia boss for years. Got mixed up in Iraq trying to take back Kuwaiti oil fields. The border was drawn by the british petroleum company (BP) at the end of WWII. Prior to WWII King Saud was making a claim. Kuwait was originally just a port in the ottoman empire.

The corruption of our "elected" government knows no bounds.

There are several people I have met through TMAN I would trust to be an honest politician. Spending their time protecting civil rights and U.S. sovereignty. So how do you get them elected? TManers favorite thing to accuse people of is throwing away their vote if you dont vote D or R. No matter that the only difference is what they say cause they are in reality in lock step with each other.

He, along with Reagan also wrote a letter to congress urging them to get behind Clintons ban. Their support no doubt helped get it passed, along with the Brady bill.

That's why I don't understand people saying we have to run " electable" candidates, aka swamped smooth talkers.

I stand corrected, it was two former democrats who signed with Reagan.
https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1994-05-05-mn-54185-story.html

Once again I ask myself why we don't examine why these young men resort to violence. Perhaps this has more to do with moral fiber than availability of certain kinds of weapons. What? We limit mass shootings to handguns so the casualty count is lower?

Reagan was senile like Biden in the 90's. You could probably get him to sign anything. Just Sayin!

Biden ran on these policies.He didn't make them up after getting in office.But hey,,I guess he had a pulse,,barely.

it is coming but who knows exactly how far ahead it is..... they know the time is right because most will not do anything about it other than line up to turn in....first they will ban sales/transfers and then they will ban possession with a turn in period. It is hard to completely eliminate the political opposition if they are armed...

oregon has a over 10 magazine ban of some kind coming/pending or whatever...