| 
| 
 
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: walleyed]
 #7928717 08/15/23 10:21 AM
08/15/23 10:21 AM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2011 MT
snowy
  OP trapper
 |  
|  OP trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2011
 MT
 | 
The reason I asked is I have used #4's of beaver and really haven't had any issues but haven't used them for beaver for years now.  I use 330's strictly now but have a chance to purchase a few used #5's.
 Do you see any real big difference from the #4 to #5's on beaver that would make it a game changer to go with 5's instead of 4's?
The wider jaw spread and higher jaws on #44 B & L's make for a higher up catch, and greater catch percentage than the smaller # 4's. IMO wYes, that is true on the spread, and I see that it could make a difference in catch success.  Just not sure the percentage of success between the two are that much different. 
 Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: newhouse114]
 #7928739 08/15/23 10:54 AM
08/15/23 10:54 AM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2006 NWWA/AZ
Vinke
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2006
 NWWA/AZ
 | 
I use them for beaver a lot, in very safe places I’ll use a Bridger brawn.Dang rich kids 
 Ant Man/ Marty 2028
 just put your ear to the ground , and follow along
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: snowy]
 #7928746 08/15/23 11:11 AM
08/15/23 11:11 AM
 |  
| Joined:  May 2010 Alaska
drasselt
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  May 2010
 Alaska
 | 
The reason I asked is I have used #4's of beaver and really haven't had any issues but haven't used them for beaver for years now.  I use 330's strictly now but have a chance to purchase a few used #5's.
 Do you see any real big difference from the #4 to #5's on beaver that would make it a game changer to go with 5's instead of 4's?
Used properly, 4's work fine.  Used properly, 5's work better.  Over time they will add to your catch.  I've used them since the early 80's.  At times I would lay down a 4 1/2 Newhouse.  A trapper has great confidence in a catch when using those!  Bigger is better for beaver, to a degree, of course.  The mountain men traps I've seen were substantial.  Yes there is something to it. 
 you can vote your way into socialism, but you will have to shoot your way out.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: walleyed]
 #7928810 08/15/23 12:56 PM
08/15/23 12:56 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Jan 2007 MN
160user
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Jan 2007
 MN
 | 
The reason I asked is I have used #4's of beaver and really haven't had any issues but haven't used them for beaver for years now.  I use 330's strictly now but have a chance to purchase a few used #5's.
 Do you see any real big difference from the #4 to #5's on beaver that would make it a game changer to go with 5's instead of 4's?
The wider jaw spread and higher jaws on #44 B & L's make for a higher up catch, and greater catch percentage than the smaller # 4's. IMO wFor me, the 44's break easier over my knee to. 
 I have nothing clever to put here.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: snowy]
 #7928813 08/15/23 12:58 PM
08/15/23 12:58 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Jun 2010 Iowa
~ADC~
   The Count
 |  
|   The Count
 
 Joined:  Jun 2010
 Iowa
 | 
The reason I asked is I have used #4's of beaver and really haven't had any issues but haven't used them for beaver for years now.  I use 330's strictly now but have a chance to purchase a few used #5's.
 Do you see any real big difference from the #4 to #5's on beaver that would make it a game changer to go with 5's instead of 4's?
If you're getting them for a decent price, you should by them IMO. Give them a try and see for yourself why all big beaver trappers use them. I bet you like them, and if not they hold their resell value great. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: snowy]
 #7928817 08/15/23 01:04 PM
08/15/23 01:04 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2006 NWWA/AZ
Vinke
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2006
 NWWA/AZ
 | 
^^^some farts are ment to be heard^^^
 Hal is a beaverman
 
 (My zen love for Today)
 
 
 
 
 Ant Man/ Marty 2028
 just put your ear to the ground , and follow along
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: snowy]
 #7928868 08/15/23 02:08 PM
08/15/23 02:08 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2011 MT
snowy
  OP trapper
 |  
|  OP trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2011
 MT
 | 
Some great advice and thank you.  I will buy 4 of them you convinced me of it.   I do believe the break over like 160 is true because I have noticed that also. 
 Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: snowy]
 #7928876 08/15/23 02:18 PM
08/15/23 02:18 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Jun 2010 Iowa
~ADC~
   The Count
 |  
|   The Count
 
 Joined:  Jun 2010
 Iowa
 | 
Some great advice and thank you.  I will buy 4 of them you convinced me of it.What are they specifically? Brand? Longsprings? Coil? Offset jaws? I'm sure there are people here with some experience with any of them that could offer advice on the use of them if you'd like. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: #5 footholds
[Re: ~ADC~]
 #7929032 08/15/23 06:00 PM
08/15/23 06:00 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2011 MT
snowy
  OP trapper
 |  
|  OP trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2011
 MT
 | 
Some great advice and thank you.  I will buy 4 of them you convinced me of it.What are they specifically? Brand? Longsprings? Coil? Offset jaws? I'm sure there are people here with some experience with any of them that could offer advice on the use of them if you'd like. Not sure on brand but will go take a look at them.  I do know they are coil and are not an off-set and are round jaw the way it sounded. 
 Give me a fish, I will eat for a day. Teach me to fish, I will eat for a lifetime
 |  |  |  
 
 |  |