Re: p tariffs
[Re: Northof50]
#8366307
03/16/25 11:06 PM
03/16/25 11:06 PM
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
10% comes across from WhiteDog generator in NW Ontario going into those lines crossing the Se corner of Manitoba No Ontario transmission crossing in SE Mb. We even feed North West Angle with our own distribution. Kenora gets their juice from 7 Sisters after feeding a couple taps for Brerton Lake & Star Lake stations. That station you’re talking about must feed from the east side of LOTW?
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: J Staton]
#8366396
03/17/25 06:25 AM
03/17/25 06:25 AM
|
Joined: Jul 2010
SE Pennsylvania
Pafoxman
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jul 2010
SE Pennsylvania
|
Tariffs worked in the past for funding .gov, income tax not needed. Why will they not work today? Is it because the U.S. dollar is now the gold standard or is because .gov has become to big and Americans are unwilling to endure the challenges of downsizing .gov? In my opinion tariffs replacing income taxes to fund government is a lot of hyperbole. Remember the promise that on day one we'd pay no more tax on tips and overtime ... hasn't happened yet.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Pafoxman]
#8366399
03/17/25 06:33 AM
03/17/25 06:33 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J Staton
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
|
Tariffs worked in the past for funding .gov, income tax not needed. Why will they not work today? Is it because the U.S. dollar is now the gold standard or is because .gov has become to big and Americans are unwilling to endure the challenges of downsizing .gov? In my opinion tariffs replacing income taxes to fund government is a lot of hyperbole. Remember the promise that on day one we'd pay no more tax on tips and overtime ... hasn't happened yet. Hyperbole or not, before the progressive President Wilson, income taxes were not a thing. If it worked before why want it work now?
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Pafoxman]
#8366402
03/17/25 06:41 AM
03/17/25 06:41 AM
|
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Providence Farm
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
|
Tariffs worked in the past for funding .gov, income tax not needed. Why will they not work today? Is it because the U.S. dollar is now the gold standard or is because .gov has become to big and Americans are unwilling to endure the challenges of downsizing .gov? In my opinion tariffs replacing income taxes to fund government is a lot of hyperbole. Remember the promise that on day one we'd pay no more tax on tips and overtime ... hasn't happened yet. Yes it may not happen at all but did you honestly believe I would before the first year or two? First tax code are mad the year before for the following year .and 2nd government is slow. Just going by your post it seem like you expect it to be instant and done in the first 3 months in office or it's some kind of got ya. If so get real. Edit. Personally I would love to see no property tax and no taxes on social security or military pay and tips before no taxes on overtime and that should say something considering I have never been in the military, am not on social security, and don't work for tips.and have always worked a lot of overtime. Only one of those I would benefit from immediately would be no property taxes. But my preference are not because they would directly benefit me but they are ridiculous taxes and would benefit those individuals greatly. And in order to pay for the government with tarrifs #1 the government would have to shrink greatly and actually pass and run on a budget. Not likely to happen enough for that to many love their pork and will fight it all the way. But I can only hope.
Last edited by Providence Farm; 03/17/25 06:56 AM.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: nimzy]
#8366442
03/17/25 07:53 AM
03/17/25 07:53 AM
|
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
Shakeyjake
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Jun 2022
Manitoba
|
Tariff is just another word for tax. So any steel buyers in the US that are bringing in steel from Canada are paying Uncle Sam 25% or whatever it is. Just source your goods from within and it’ll be all good!
Wind Blew, crap flew, out came the line crew
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Dan Barnhurst]
#8366551
03/17/25 10:56 AM
03/17/25 10:56 AM
|
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Trapper7
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
|
He want's fair trade. We tariff you what you tariff us. So yes I think the goal is everyone trading with us with no tariffs either way. That's what I heard too. Seems fair to me.
My wife wants me to wear a bracelet that belonged to her grandfather. It says, "Do Not Resuscitate".
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: nimzy]
#8366566
03/17/25 11:35 AM
03/17/25 11:35 AM
|
Joined: May 2010
alabama
BandB
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: May 2010
alabama
|
[quote=Dan Barnhurst]
Such a simple concept to get countries to lower their tariffs, yet so difficult for people to understand. How's that working out so far......??? So far. You mean in the past 2 months? Everybody wants instant gratification these days.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: J Staton]
#8366587
03/17/25 12:08 PM
03/17/25 12:08 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
|
Tariffs worked in the past for funding .gov, income tax not needed. Why will they not work today? Is it because the U.S. dollar is now the gold standard or is because .gov has become to big and Americans are unwilling to endure the challenges of downsizing .gov? How high would they have to be? This is not a sales tax. It is a tax on only imported stuff. 24 percent of U.S. GDP is Federal spending. Before income taxes ( income tax and payroll taxes) it was like 3 percent of GDP. 70 percent of Federal spending is wealth transfer ( Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid ) Before income taxes that would have been around 0 percent of Federal Spending. Current income taxes don't even cover all the spending. Seriously downsizing spending would mean the people ( mostly old people ) who benefit from the above three programs would have to accept a cut to these benefits. Good Luck!
Last edited by Dirt; 03/17/25 12:21 PM. Reason: a little high on percent
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Pafoxman]
#8366592
03/17/25 12:13 PM
03/17/25 12:13 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
Such a simple concept to get countries to lower their tariffs, yet so difficult for people to understand.
How's that working out so far......??? Pull your big boy pants (or skirt) on, time to MAGA and be done with the liberal lunacy.
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Pafoxman]
#8366596
03/17/25 12:20 PM
03/17/25 12:20 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Wi.
Diggerman
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2012
Wi.
|
Tariffs worked in the past for funding .gov, income tax not needed. Why will they not work today? Is it because the U.S. dollar is now the gold standard or is because .gov has become to big and Americans are unwilling to endure the challenges of downsizing .gov? In my opinion tariffs replacing income taxes to fund government is a lot of hyperbole. Remember the promise that on day one we'd pay no more tax on tips and overtime ... hasn't happened yet. 90 days, what have you accomplished in the last 90 days? I thought so.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Dirt]
#8366612
03/17/25 12:45 PM
03/17/25 12:45 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J Staton
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
|
Tariffs worked in the past for funding .gov, income tax not needed. Why will they not work today? Is it because the U.S. dollar is now the gold standard or is because .gov has become to big and Americans are unwilling to endure the challenges of downsizing .gov? How high would they have to be? This is not a sales tax. It is a tax on only imported stuff. 24 percent of U.S. GDP is Federal spending. Before income taxes ( income tax and payroll taxes) it was like 3 percent of GDP. 70 percent of Federal spending is wealth transfer ( Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid ) Before income taxes that would have been around 0 percent of Federal Spending. Current income taxes don't even cover all the spending. Seriously downsizing spending would mean the people ( mostly old people ) who benefit from the above three programs would have to accept a cut to these benefits. Good Luck! Yea I could see that would be a problem.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: Diggerman]
#8366641
03/17/25 01:44 PM
03/17/25 01:44 PM
|
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
hippie
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Feb 2010
pa
|
If anyone is against a smaller Fed Govt and lower taxes after seeing the waste and bald faced fraud, first hand, your a communist, plain and simple. X2 Just the waste and fraud already exposed is enough to make a person sick, let alone what we'll never find out about. This was long overdue and there's no plausible reason for someone to NOT want it exposed!
There comes a point liberalism has gone too far, we're past that point.
|
|
|
Re: p tariffs
[Re: nimzy]
#8366642
03/17/25 01:46 PM
03/17/25 01:46 PM
|
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
Dirt
trapper
|
trapper
Joined: Dec 2010
Armpit, ak
|
As a side note over half of Medicaid spending. The amount spent in dollars goes to seniors. Mostly funding nursing homes.
P.S. I believe the payroll tax is based on earned income. ie an income tax?
Who is John Galt?
|
|
|
|
|