No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers ***NO POLITICS
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Minnesota Trapline Products
Please support our sponsor for the Trappers Talk Page - Minnesota Trapline Products


Print Thread
Hop To
Page 9 of 12 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417950
06/11/25 10:20 AM
06/11/25 10:20 AM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
We just spent a year and half on Isaiah and i agree with it alone and my life experiences it would be enough to convince me. Too many prophetic words fulfilled in it alone by Jesus.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: TreedaBlackdog] #8417951
06/11/25 10:20 AM
06/11/25 10:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by TreedaBlackdog

Trapper7.......once again....you stated someone was recently making fake fossils and having them dated millions of years old. I cant find that post now but I am interested in reading about it. can you direct me to that source? And how can a flood kill sea dwelling animals? I believe the opposite to be true, drought would almost have to happen for them to die and be fossilized. And why does it have to always be Noahs flood, Im sure there were many back then and earlier just as is happening now? If the earth was once water covered, how could it flood?


I will tackle some of this. I too have read and watched as carbon dating of new materials comes back millions of years old. With heat and pressure and flooding - materials can be changed and scientific samples taken and examined and random dates assigned according to interpretation. Flood could easily kill sea animals by dilution of needed materials in the sea. Don't believe me - get a salt water aquarium, buy a bunch of expensive salt water fish and fill it with fresh water.
Show me one example of a flood before Noah or I will simplify it for you - show me one example of a rain before then. And again - show me where the Earth was ever covered by water before the flood.

Again, many people simply can't believe what the Bible says and don't even truly know it enough to know what it says. Quit assuming things and research them. It is ok to question things but we should all try to use critical thinking skills and learn. My faith has led me to many, many questions I have researched and experienced for myself. I have learned to believe and trust in Jesus and the Word.
[/quote]
First of all, I don't remember saying someone was making fake fossils and having them dated millions of years old. But, I can see where shysters might do something like that to make a buck. I made mention that we found sea shells on a mountain in CO while elk hunting there. If tectonic plates made the sea high and dry, sea dwelling animals would perish.

In Genesis chapter 1, it clearly says the earth was formless and void and God made the waters recede and the land became visible. This would have been before the flood of Noah. You don't have to research that, it's a fact. Some bible scholars say there could have been many floods prior to Genesis 1. I don't know if there was or not, but the earth was flooded prior to the flood of Noah. That's just common sense.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8417961
06/11/25 10:54 AM
06/11/25 10:54 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Also after the desolation verse in Luke 21:20
Vs 22 he mentions judgment =vengeance. [Linked Image]
The generation he is speaking to is surly the same generation he is warning of coming judgment in Matthew 23:33-36
[Linked Image]
Does this really seem like Jesus is speaking of anything other that the 70 ad distruction of Jerusalem and the temple.

I think it does. It definitely predicts his return in both gospels. The generation he refers to is the generation at that future time, not the generation alive when he spoke these words.

2 Thessalonians 2, Paul is talking about the return of Jesus. He is referring to the anti-christ who is revealed as a man who exalts himself above God as he takes his seat in the temple displaying himself as being God.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8417981
06/11/25 11:33 AM
06/11/25 11:33 AM
Joined: Apr 2017
PA
L
lumberjack391 Offline
trapper
lumberjack391  Offline
trapper
L

Joined: Apr 2017
PA
I agree, a flood could possibly kill sea creatures, a drought would be more likely. I try to use critical thinking like science. Im pretty sure it was you that made that post but it doesnt matter now, it is gone- I cant find it. They were fossils already when the tektonic plates pushed them up to the top of the mountain. You say the earth was flooded prior to the flood of Noah, How is that common sense and where did the extra water come from?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8417987
06/11/25 12:11 PM
06/11/25 12:11 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Trapper7
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Also after the desolation verse in Luke 21:20
Vs 22 he mentions judgment =vengeance. [Linked Image]
The generation he is speaking to is surly the same generation he is warning of coming judgment in Matthew 23:33-36
[Linked Image]
Does this really seem like Jesus is speaking of anything other that the 70 ad distruction of Jerusalem and the temple.

I think it does. It definitely predicts his return in both gospels. The generation he refers to is the generation at that future time, not the generation alive when he spoke these words.

2 Thessalonians 2, Paul is talking about the return of Jesus. He is referring to the anti-christ who is revealed as a man who exalts himself above God as he takes his seat in the temple displaying himself as being God.

He was talking to that generation. Otherwise what good is fleeing to the mountains? You can't escape from God's final judgment, but you might be able to hide from an army. Yes, the destruction of Jerusalem was God's judgment on the unbelieving Jews. It changed everything for them. No more sacrificial system (Christ was the last sacrifice.) The temple desecration and destruction. Even the part about scorging prophets in the synagogue. Sounds familiar because Paul and others were beaten and scouged by the Jews. All this happened in the first century.

"When you see Jerusalem being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is near." I don't know how he could have made it any plainer, but for some reason people want to move all this into the future and applaud for Israel the nation instead of Jesus.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418010
06/11/25 01:20 PM
06/11/25 01:20 PM
Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
T
TreedaBlackdog Offline
trapper
TreedaBlackdog  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Jan 2007
B61-12 vicinity, MO
In Genesis chapter 1, it clearly says the earth was formless and void and God made the waters recede and the land became visible. - quote from Trapper7

I agree with the earth as formless and void and waters being present as the Spirit of the Lord moved on them. I read again and see a firmament or vault then being created (heaven). Waters were then split above and below heaven (Day2) On day 3 waters below the firmament were gathered together and dry earth or land was formed. I disagree water receded and it became visible - it had not been formed or created. The earth was without form........it is difficult to comprehend but we all need to slow down and learn what the Bible says, not what we think we know. I myself just learned again on day 3 with the land formed, then plants and grass were created - a full day before the sun. Wonder how they functioned without photosynthesis...........I can't explain it but believe it.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418440
06/12/25 11:18 AM
06/12/25 11:18 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
genesis says the word cattle what are cattle for if not to kill and eat?
so death was already on its why
and god made domesticated cows sheep goats dogs pig and many other nope man did we can trace it back 10,000 years or more
don't get me wrong i would like to believe again but once's you see the magic trick
you can't unsee it
and when it doesn't make sense anymore you can't make it

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418459
06/12/25 11:34 AM
06/12/25 11:34 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
beaverpeeler Offline
trapper
beaverpeeler  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2006
Oregon
The premise of carbon14 dating of fossils is already sketchy. We know that carbon14 cannot date anything older than about 60,000 years and is most reliable to about 20-25,000 years. Millions of years is not possible and nobody except people trying to disprove science would even go down that road.


My fear of moving stairs is escalating!
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418466
06/12/25 11:38 AM
06/12/25 11:38 AM
Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
T
Trapper7 Offline
trapper
Trapper7  Offline
trapper
T

Joined: Dec 2006
MN, Land of 10,000 Lakes
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.


The first bottles of Coca Cola contained 3.5 grams of cocaine. That's how our grandparents were able to walk to school uphill both ways in the snow.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8418582
06/12/25 04:22 PM
06/12/25 04:22 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Trapper7
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.

Let me ask another question just to get you thinking: when was Jesus ' first coming? Because it is in the Bible and it wasn't as a baby.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418596
06/12/25 04:51 PM
06/12/25 04:51 PM
Joined: Dec 2024
AR
J
J Staton Offline
trapper
J Staton  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Dec 2024
AR
The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Trapper7] #8418637
06/12/25 06:32 PM
06/12/25 06:32 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by Trapper7
GS, Jesus and Paul are referring to his return in combination to the other things. If it was that present generation he was referring to, when did Jesus return? The only group I know of that say Jesus has already returned are the Jehovah Witnesses.

T7
I believe Jesus speaking to an audience that understood old testament judgment language. .
Hears a few..
Lev 16:2 Ezekial 30:3 joel2:2 Zephiniah 1:15 (comes in clouds)
Isaiah 13:10. 34:4. Ez 32:7-8 Jer4:27-28 darkness, stars falling.
Apocalyptic type language.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418647
06/12/25 06:56 PM
06/12/25 06:56 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
T7
Hear is a good example of prophecy leading to Jesus regarding the stars falling.
If you read it in context . [Linked Image]
Obviously this is not actual Starz.
It's speaking of how the family of Jacob will bow to there brother Joseph.
Another interesting prophecy that falls in line with this is the 70 weeks of Daniel.
70 7s.
I don't believe it was by chance that Jesus told Peter to forgive your Brother 70 ×7
This would be in line with the time line of the beginning of Daniel's prophecy to the time spoken of by Luke.
( these are the days of vengeance or judgment.) Ch 21 I believe.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: J Staton] #8418650
06/12/25 07:01 PM
06/12/25 07:01 PM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by J Staton
The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.

John 1:1 tells us that Jesus pre existed everything. But I was speaking about the first time he appeared as a man. Scholars tell us that the angel of God mentioned a few times in the Old Testament was actually Jesus appearing as a man.
Now, there are historical writings that indicate strange miracles and Jesus appearing during the Jewish war of 70 AD. That's not concrete evidence that it's true but there's no reason to rule it out, either. Of course it also doesn't mean there won't be a future return.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: PAskinner] #8418855
06/12/25 11:49 PM
06/12/25 11:49 PM
Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
G
Giant Sage Offline
trapper
Giant Sage  Offline
trapper
G

Joined: Mar 2017
Wy
Originally Posted by PAskinner
Originally Posted by J Staton
The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.

John 1:1 tells us that Jesus pre existed everything. But I was speaking about the first time he appeared as a man. Scholars tell us that the angel of God mentioned a few times in the Old Testament was actually Jesus appearing as a man.
Now, there are historical writings that indicate strange miracles and Jesus appearing during the Jewish war of 70 AD. That's not concrete evidence that it's true but there's no reason to rule it out, either. Of course it also doesn't mean there won't be a future return.

Skinner , are you speaking of instances like the Lord coming to Abraham before the distruction of Sadom.
Or
maybe when he appeared to Joshua by the river Jordan as a Man with a sword.
Or maybe even as early as Adam and Eve heard the lord walking in the cool of the day in the Garden.


Christ is King
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Husky] #8418890
06/13/25 01:27 AM
06/13/25 01:27 AM
Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
W
wildlifeartist1 Offline
trapper
wildlifeartist1  Offline
trapper
W

Joined: Mar 2007
michigan, usa
they don't even know who wrote what we have now and call the bible and it took 1500 years
god has to be the worst communicator.. he? wrote it on grass and skins no problem there
as copies got old just make a new copy by hand oops i missed a few lines a paragraph
a chapter .. is that ( a we or a them ) i can't make it out just guess, thousands of
clerical errors, we do not have the original anymore. so what did really say?

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8418916
06/13/25 06:41 AM
06/13/25 06:41 AM
Joined: Dec 2008
Eastern Shore of Maryland
HobbieTrapper Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"
HobbieTrapper  Offline
"Chippendale Trapper"

Joined: Dec 2008
Eastern Shore of Maryland
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
Wow how misinformed
check the facts the real truth not what some preacher said
we didn't even have what we call the bible till the 4th century
what did the world do before that
if one part is made up why can't it all be.
judges 15
samson went out and caught (three hundred fox), tied their tails
together in pairs and lashed a torch between each pair of tails
to spread fire in the philistine's crops
yeah, sure he did.
how long would it take to catch 300 fox
probably have to have pens to put them in and feed and water too.
is this a true story



Where does it say he did that all at once?


-Goofy
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8418925
06/13/25 07:19 AM
06/13/25 07:19 AM
Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
P
Providence Farm Offline
trapper
Providence Farm  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Feb 2020
Indiana
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
they don't even know who wrote what we have now and call the bible and it took 1500 years
god has to be the worst communicator.. he? wrote it on grass and skins no problem there
as copies got old just make a new copy by hand oops i missed a few lines a paragraph
a chapter .. is that ( a we or a them ) i can't make it out just guess, thousands of
clerical errors, we do not have the original anymore. so what did really say?



You seem to miss It's GOD your speaking of. Creator if everything. If he wants his word preserved it will be. If he wants a whale to come up and give you transportation and you be alive when you get there you will be and it will. If he wants 300 foxes to be used to start a fire they likely walked right up and wanted to get the fire fastened to them

When the LORD wants something done it will be done. Often it will be unbelievable and against all odds and it's by design to leave zero doubt it was God's hand.

Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: Giant Sage] #8418926
06/13/25 07:38 AM
06/13/25 07:38 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by Giant Sage
Originally Posted by PAskinner
[quote=J Staton]The first coming would be mentioned in John1:1.
John 1:1 tells us that Jesus pre existed everything. But I was speaking about the first time he appeared as a man. Scholars tell us that the angel of God mentioned a few times in the Old Testament was actually Jesus appearing as a man.
Now, there are historical writings that indicate strange miracles and Jesus appearing during the Jewish war of 70 AD. That's not concrete evidence that it's true but there's no reason to rule it out, either. Of course it also doesn't mean there won't be a future return.
Skinner , are you speaking of instances like the Lord coming to Abraham before the distruction of Sadom.
Or
maybe when he appeared to Joshua by the river Jordan as a Man with a sword.
Or maybe even as early as Adam and Eve heard the lord walking in the cool of the day in the Garden.




Yes. I'm not sure about the garden of Eden...never really thought about that being Jesus, but of course, why wouldn't it be? He appeared to Abraham as a man to re affirm the promise of a son, too.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Re: Reliability of the Bible [Re: wildlifeartist1] #8418927
06/13/25 07:40 AM
06/13/25 07:40 AM
Joined: Aug 2010
PA
P
PAskinner Offline
trapper
PAskinner  Offline
trapper
P

Joined: Aug 2010
PA
Originally Posted by wildlifeartist1
they don't even know who wrote what we have now and call the bible and it took 1500 years
god has to be the worst communicator.. he? wrote it on grass and skins no problem there
as copies got old just make a new copy by hand oops i missed a few lines a paragraph
a chapter .. is that ( a we or a them ) i can't make it out just guess, thousands of
clerical errors, we do not have the original anymore. so what did really say?

There's no significant differences between the writings from the dead sea scrolls and the ones that made it in the Bible. Those clerical errors are irrelevant, because the theology remains intact.


Right now I’m having amnesia and déjà vu at the same time. I think I’ve forgotten this before.
Page 9 of 12 1 2 7 8 9 10 11 12
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread