| 
| 
 
| 
| 
|  .
 #8463356 09/03/25 07:07 PM
09/03/25 07:07 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Sep 2008 NC
bowhunter27295
  OP trapper
 |  
|  OP trapper
 
 Joined:  Sep 2008
 NC
 | 
. 
Last edited by bowhunter27295; 09/15/25 09:51 PM.
 
 How many lies will people believe before they realize their own idiocy?
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: charles]
 #8463384 09/03/25 07:46 PM
09/03/25 07:46 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Mar 2023 WI
WI Outdoors
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Mar 2023
 WI
 | 
I wonder if they are a fad.  Ugly as heck.  When I shoot, it is only once.  Dead deer right there.
 Question:  If I had one and used it to sight in a rifle, would the point of impact change if I no longer used the can?
You're thinking about them in the wrong way......  There's lots of things that are unconstitutional.   I like to follow the rules and stay out of trouble.  |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: charles]
 #8463386 09/03/25 07:48 PM
09/03/25 07:48 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Jan 2017 Marion Kansas
Yes sir
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Jan 2017
 Marion Kansas
 | 
I wonder if they are a fad.  Ugly as heck.  When I shoot, it is only once.  Dead deer right there.
 Question:  If I had one and used it to sight in a rifle, would the point of impact change if I no longer used the can?
A fair chance it would.
Last edited by Yes sir; 09/03/25 07:49 PM.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: charles]
 #8463408 09/03/25 08:13 PM
09/03/25 08:13 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2006 NW Missouri
bob56
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2006
 NW Missouri
 | 
 I wonder if they are a fad.  Ugly as heck.  When I shoot, it is only once.  Dead deer right there.
 Question:  If I had one and used it to sight in a rifle, would the point of impact change if I no longer used the can?
On my 17WSM. 17 Remington and 223 the point of impact didn't change. Just have to  see what your rifle does with and without. 
 “A government big enough to give you everything you want, is strong enough to take everything you have.”
 - Thomas Jefferson
 
 
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: bowhunter27295]
 #8463413 09/03/25 08:20 PM
09/03/25 08:20 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2010 Central, SD
Law Dog
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Dec 2010
 Central, SD
 | 
Suppressors are a big thing here have been even before it got easier to get them  predator callers mostly started 15-20 years ago. The Sheriff had to sign off and we did the print cards. 
 Was born in a Big City Will die in the Country OK with that!
 
 Jerry Herbst
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: WI Outdoors]
 #8463422 09/03/25 08:28 PM
09/03/25 08:28 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Jan 2007 Georgia
warrior
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Jan 2007
 Georgia
 | 
I wonder if they are a fad.  Ugly as heck.  When I shoot, it is only once.  Dead deer right there.
 Question:  If I had one and used it to sight in a rifle, would the point of impact change if I no longer used the can?
You're thinking about them in the wrong way......  There's lots of things that are unconstitutional.   I like to follow the rules and stay out of trouble. That shooting only once can be an issue as well with some designs. Either first round pop or impact shift or both. Basically a cold empty can being sudenly filled with hot gasses. One benefit of the popularity is newer and better designs hitting the market that eliminate many older issues. While I haven't partaken of, I have been following, watching and reading and I believe the suppressor guys have done more advancements in materials and design in the last decade or so than the rest of the gun industry in the last century. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: bowhunter27295]
 #8463424 09/03/25 08:31 PM
09/03/25 08:31 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Feb 2007 New York border
Cragar
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Feb 2007
 New York border
 | 
I feel the way they do in some other countries where suppressors are completely legal and encouraged.
 It is like taking a big engine and running it on open headers. Sounds cool but you can hear it miles away. Can you imagine the noise if all cars didn't have mufflers ? That would be just raw and rude.
 
 Having one on a firearm cuts down hugely on the noise pollution. Even with just one shot a season deer hunting is bad for your ears , I doubt most hunters wear hearing protection because it takes away noises they need to hear , like game moving. With a suppressor you don't need hearing protection as much.
 
 Plus if you harvest a deer with a suppressor , you will not spook the deer the guy down the road is trying to harvest.
 
 NRA benefactor member
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: Cragar]
 #8463426 09/03/25 08:36 PM
09/03/25 08:36 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Sep 2013 Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Sep 2013
 Green County Wisconsin
 | 
I feel the way they do in some other countries where suppressors are completely legal and encouraged.
 It is like taking a big engine and running it on open headers. Sounds cool but you can hear it miles away. Can you imagine the noise if all cars didn't have mufflers ? That would be just raw and rude.
 
 Having one on a firearm cuts down hugely on the noise pollution. Even with just one shot a season deer hunting is bad for your ears , I doubt most hunters wear hearing protection because it takes away noises they need to hear , like game moving. With a suppressor you don't need hearing protection as much.
 
 Plus if you harvest a deer with a suppressor , you will not spook the deer the guy down the road is trying to harvest.
you are required to have a muffler on your motorcycle , car , truck , lawn mower , it just makes sense we should be running hearing protecting simple mufflers on  our guns as well. the 0 dollar tax stamp goes into effect Jan 1  it serves to take the money out of it , it may well make further change later.  I am going to get my prints on Friday and get the process started so I either pre-buy and take delivery after Jan 1 or buy Jan 1 
 America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: GREENCOUNTYPETE]
 #8463453 09/03/25 09:20 PM
09/03/25 09:20 PM
 |  
| Joined:  May 2010 MN
Steven 49er
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  May 2010
 MN
 | 
 I am going to get my prints on Friday and get the process started so I either pre-buy and take delivery after Jan 1 or buy Jan 1
Silencer Central is offering several models right now where they will cover the $250 fee. 
 "Gold is money, everything else is just credit" JP Morgan
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: charles]
 #8463456 09/03/25 09:27 PM
09/03/25 09:27 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Oct 2024 Kansas
someGuyInKansas
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Oct 2024
 Kansas
 | 
I wonder if they are a fad.  Ugly as heck.  When I shoot, it is only once.  Dead deer right there.
 Question:  If I had one and used it to sight in a rifle, would the point of impact change if I no longer used the can?
subsonics in a suppressed 22 are amazing. There is no crack or pop.  The primary sound is the action cycling. On a 4" bull barrel pistol, it just looks like a slightly long barrelled pistol.  On a 10/22 charger with arm brace, it looks like a small rifle even with the suppressor. On larger rifles its still helpful.  Yes it moves the POI, but it is repeatable. |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: Steven 49er]
 #8463480 09/03/25 09:57 PM
09/03/25 09:57 PM
 |  
| Joined:  Sep 2013 Green County Wisconsin
GREENCOUNTYPETE
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Sep 2013
 Green County Wisconsin
 | 
 I am going to get my prints on Friday and get the process started so I either pre-buy and take delivery after Jan 1 or buy Jan 1
Silencer Central is offering several models right now where they will cover the $250 fee.I will look at that , I am specifically looking at a Rambling Man 46cal to go on my 1895 45-70 dark 
 America only has one issue, we have a Responsibility crisis and everything else stems from it.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: bowhunter27295]
 #8463516 09/04/25 12:00 AM
09/04/25 12:00 AM
 |  
| Joined:  Mar 2014 Lakes Region Indiana
loosanarrow
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Mar 2014
 Lakes Region Indiana
 | 
Not a fad at all in my opinion. After I got my first one I wanted all my guns threaded. 
 We had our annual high school buddies range day last weekend, we are all in our mid 50’s now, and about half the guns had suppressors on them. By the end of the day we seriously considered not allowing anything without a suppressor next year. It was refreshing to not have to have ear protection all the time, just made the whole day more enjoyable. We also discussed tinnitus and every single one of us has developed it now. Thousands of shotgun rounds bird hunting, hundreds of rifle rounds deer and other hunting without ear protection. Suppressors might save the next generation from so much hearing loss.
 
 We put mufflers on cars, and they aren’t nearly as loud. I am a fan of suppressors and think they should not only be as legal and unregulated as a scope, but also encouraged. And my .22 squirrel rifle shoots a tad better with the can on, and the tree rats barely stop munching a nut when the one on the next branch over suddenly makes a “plop” noise and falls to the ground. I have regularly shoot a limit from one hickory without even disturbing the one not shot yet.
 
Last edited by loosanarrow; 09/04/25 12:00 AM.
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: bowhunter27295]
 #8463541 09/04/25 04:48 AM
09/04/25 04:48 AM
 |  
| Joined:  Dec 2006 williamsburg ks
danny clifton
   "Grumpy Old Man"
 |  
|   "Grumpy Old Man"
 
 Joined:  Dec 2006
 williamsburg ks
 | 
IF I buy one it will be cause I decided to buy a 22 with a threaded barrel. Would be a boon for small game. I trap predators. Don't like shooting more than one deer a day. Processing meat is not a chore I enjoy with big game. 
 Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790)
 |  |  |  
| 
| 
|  Re: Legality of suppressors
[Re: bowhunter27295]
 #8463554 09/04/25 06:06 AM
09/04/25 06:06 AM
 |  
| Joined:  Aug 2013 Louisville, Nebraska
jabNE
   trapper
 |  
|   trapper
 
 Joined:  Aug 2013
 Louisville, Nebraska
 | 
I always wanted one for my .22 for the coyote trapline Danny. That way I wouldn’t wake up the landowners around here in middle of the night when I’m running traps late.Jim
 
 Money cannot buy you happiness, but it can buy you a trapping license and that's pretty close.
 |  |  |  
 
 |  |