Strictly Trapping


No Profanity *** No Flaming *** No Advertising *** No Anti Trappers *** No Politics
No Non-Target Catches *** No Links to Anti-trapping Sites *** No Avoiding Profanity Filter


Home~Trap Talk~ADC Forum~Trap Shed~Wilderness Trapping~International Trappers~Fur Handling

Auction Forum~Trapper Tips~Links~Gallery~Basic Sets~Convention Calendar~Chat~ Trap Collecting Forum

Trapper's Humor~Strictly Trapping~Fur Buyers Directory~Mugshots~Fur Sale Directory~Wildcrafting~The Pen and Quill

Trapper's Tales~Words From The Past~Legends~Archives~Kids Forum~Lure Formulators Forum~ Fermenter's Forum


~~~ Dobbins' Products Catalog ~~~


Trading Post
(Please support F&T Trading Post, our sponsor for the Trapping Only Forum)



TrappersPost
Please support Trappers post, a sponsor of the Strictly Trapping Forum



Print Thread
Hop To
Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 #8593017
Yesterday at 06:35 PM
Yesterday at 06:35 PM
Joined: May 2025
Texas
O
Outdoor todd Offline OP
trapper
Outdoor todd  Offline OP
trapper
O

Joined: May 2025
Texas

Your thoughts on these two traps for fox and coon. I would put wild river pans on the 1.65.


Loving every day as it comes.
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593019
Yesterday at 06:44 PM
Yesterday at 06:44 PM
Joined: Feb 2020
Pennsylvania
J
JesseA Offline
trapper
JesseA  Offline
trapper
J

Joined: Feb 2020
Pennsylvania
For just fox and coon, id go 450. Already has a wide jaw face and P.I.T. pan from the factory, pretty much pull out of the box and set

Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593111
Yesterday at 09:54 PM
Yesterday at 09:54 PM
Joined: Apr 2012
Northern Mn
rick olson Offline
trapper
rick olson  Offline
trapper

Joined: Apr 2012
Northern Mn
Both are excellent for fox and coon,MB will be more $$$ but it's a much better built footholds.Higher theft area 1.65's.

Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593114
Yesterday at 09:58 PM
Yesterday at 09:58 PM
Joined: May 2025
Texas
O
Outdoor todd Offline OP
trapper
Outdoor todd  Offline OP
trapper
O

Joined: May 2025
Texas
All private property but I am going with the mb I think.


Loving every day as it comes.
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593124
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Yesterday at 10:29 PM
Joined: Nov 2012
Frazee, MN
B
backroadsarcher Online content
trapper
backroadsarcher  Online Content
trapper
B

Joined: Nov 2012
Frazee, MN
Go with the MB. I am not a fan of putting on a non factory pan on a trap.

Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593127
Yesterday at 10:33 PM
Yesterday at 10:33 PM
Joined: Feb 2026
SE Ohio
B
Beaver Knocker Offline
trapper
Beaver Knocker  Offline
trapper
B

Joined: Feb 2026
SE Ohio
I've never used either specifically, but from my experience with the brands, the MB is a much higher quality trap. Another benefit is that the MB's come out of the box ready to go. No pan adjustment needed 98% of the time. And the thicker jaw face provides better holding power, especially with the coon.


Sure, I'm a member of PETA! People Eating Tasty Animals!
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593140
Yesterday at 11:25 PM
Yesterday at 11:25 PM
Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Turtledale Offline
trapper
Turtledale  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
MB 450


NYSTA, NTA, FTA, life member Erie county trappers assn.,life member Catt.county trappers
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593170
14 hours ago
14 hours ago
Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
Scott__aR Offline
trapper
Scott__aR  Offline
trapper

Joined: Dec 2020
Wisconsin
MB 450, I don't think you will be needing the increased jaw size of the 1.65 and definitely not an oversized pan.

For just fox and coon, I'd look at the Duke Pro Series 450 - Half Offset also a well built trap. Created for the fox live trap market.


Megapredator ... top of the food chain!
Member of WTA
Member of U.P. Trappers
Member of NTA
Member of FTA
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Beaver Knocker] #8593211
10 hours ago
10 hours ago
Joined: May 2025
Texas
O
Outdoor todd Offline OP
trapper
Outdoor todd  Offline OP
trapper
O

Joined: May 2025
Texas
That was the next question. What jaw type, there are a lot of coyote out here so I was thinking 1/2 off set


Loving every day as it comes.
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593356
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Joined: Feb 2011
nebraska
S
scheide Offline
trapper
scheide  Offline
trapper
S

Joined: Feb 2011
nebraska
With a 1/2" offset you will lose all your coon. Or did you mean buy half of them offset? I would personally just use the stock pan if using a 1.65. I have taken coyotes by both front feet in stock 1.65 bridgers.

Last edited by scheide; 5 hours ago.
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593358
5 hours ago
5 hours ago
Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Turtledale Offline
trapper
Turtledale  Offline
trapper

Joined: Mar 2020
W NY
Closed jaw, I have no problem holding yotes in 450 cj

Last edited by Turtledale; 5 hours ago.

NYSTA, NTA, FTA, life member Erie county trappers assn.,life member Catt.county trappers
Re: Bridger 1.65 vs mb 450 [Re: Outdoor todd] #8593430
3 hours ago
3 hours ago
Joined: May 2025
Texas
O
Outdoor todd Offline OP
trapper
Outdoor todd  Offline OP
trapper
O

Joined: May 2025
Texas
That's what I needed


Loving every day as it comes.
Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread

Moderated by  Drifter 

Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.1